지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.6
- 수록면
- 77 - 140 (64page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Proxy advisory firms such as ISS or Glass Lewis play an important role in capital markets. They advise institutional investors how to vote in shareholders’ meetings and often have a important influence on the outcome. Such immense power has leaded concern and calls for regulation.
The SEC raised two issues associated with the operation of proxy advisory firms that could impair shareholder voting. ① a lack of “adequate accountability for informational accuracy in the development and application of voting standards,” ② conflicts of interests that are “insufficiently disclosed and managed.”
Without that there are also problems of monopoly. Two big proxy advisory firm’s(ISS and Glass Lewis) market shares are almost over the 97%.
SEC issued new rule against Proxy Voting Advice on 2020. 7. 22. “Amendments to Exemptions from the Proxy Rules for Proxy Voting Advice”(Release No. 34-87457). The SEC is proposing amendments to its rules governing proxy solicitations to help ensure that investors who use proxy voting advice receive more accurate, transparent, and complete information on which to make their voting decisions, in a manner that does not impose undue costs or delays. The proposed amendments would condition the availability of certain existing exemptions from the information and filing requirements of the federal proxy rules for proxy voting advice businesses upon compliance with additional disclosure and procedural requirements. In addition, the proposed amendments would codify the Commission’s interpretation that proxy voting advice generally constitutes a solicitation within the meaning of the SEA of 1934. Finally, the proposed amendments would amend the proxy rules to clarify when the failure to disclose certain information in proxy voting advice may be considered misleading within the meaning of the rule, depending upon the particular facts and circumstances at issue.
In our country, July 30, 2016. National Fund adopted ‘Stewardship Code’ in order to strengthen the shareholders right. With stewardship activity, it is most important that how they use their voting right. Because they should correspond to many shareholders meeting of the corporations they invested, institutional investors can’t employ members and burden the fee for voting at the shareholders meeting, Many institutional investors employ the services of proxy advisors to analyze the management and receive voting recommendations on exercising their voting right. So, in our country also, the roll of proxy advisors like ISS will be increasingly important at voting right. But, the monopoly of proxy advisory market by the big advisory company brought severe unreliability to that advise activities, So, it needs to be regulated by the law in order to maintain the justice of advisory market.
The regulation also should focus on the issue of giving the information to their client about conflicts of interests, basic material of analysis, methodologies of proxy advisors.
The SEC raised two issues associated with the operation of proxy advisory firms that could impair shareholder voting. ① a lack of “adequate accountability for informational accuracy in the development and application of voting standards,” ② conflicts of interests that are “insufficiently disclosed and managed.”
Without that there are also problems of monopoly. Two big proxy advisory firm’s(ISS and Glass Lewis) market shares are almost over the 97%.
SEC issued new rule against Proxy Voting Advice on 2020. 7. 22. “Amendments to Exemptions from the Proxy Rules for Proxy Voting Advice”(Release No. 34-87457). The SEC is proposing amendments to its rules governing proxy solicitations to help ensure that investors who use proxy voting advice receive more accurate, transparent, and complete information on which to make their voting decisions, in a manner that does not impose undue costs or delays. The proposed amendments would condition the availability of certain existing exemptions from the information and filing requirements of the federal proxy rules for proxy voting advice businesses upon compliance with additional disclosure and procedural requirements. In addition, the proposed amendments would codify the Commission’s interpretation that proxy voting advice generally constitutes a solicitation within the meaning of the SEA of 1934. Finally, the proposed amendments would amend the proxy rules to clarify when the failure to disclose certain information in proxy voting advice may be considered misleading within the meaning of the rule, depending upon the particular facts and circumstances at issue.
In our country, July 30, 2016. National Fund adopted ‘Stewardship Code’ in order to strengthen the shareholders right. With stewardship activity, it is most important that how they use their voting right. Because they should correspond to many shareholders meeting of the corporations they invested, institutional investors can’t employ members and burden the fee for voting at the shareholders meeting, Many institutional investors employ the services of proxy advisors to analyze the management and receive voting recommendations on exercising their voting right. So, in our country also, the roll of proxy advisors like ISS will be increasingly important at voting right. But, the monopoly of proxy advisory market by the big advisory company brought severe unreliability to that advise activities, So, it needs to be regulated by the law in order to maintain the justice of advisory market.
The regulation also should focus on the issue of giving the information to their client about conflicts of interests, basic material of analysis, methodologies of proxy advisors.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 의결권 자문시장의 성장
Ⅲ. 의결권 자문회사의 문제점과 그에 대한 규제의 필요
Ⅳ. SEC 규제의 내용
Ⅴ. 우리나라에서의 규제
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
국문초록
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (43)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
의결권행사자문회사의 현황 및 구미 선진국에서의 규제에 관한 비교법적 고찰
강원법학
2016 .10
-
위임장권유제도의 재고찰 ― 본질에 대한 재고와 개선과제 ―
증권법연구
2022 .08
-
위임장권유규제의 비교분석과 그 시사점
인권과 정의
2021 .09
-
미국연방위임장규칙의 개정 동향과 시사점
법과 정책연구
2017 .01
-
의결권자문의 법적 지위와 과제 - 미국의 규제동향을 중심으로 -
기업법연구
2022 .06
-
전자투표제도와 전자위임장권유제도의 운영현황과 개선과제
증권법연구
2015 .08
-
주주총회의 활성화를 위한 과제
기업법연구
2016 .06
-
의결권행사 자문회사의 활용 및 규제
증권법연구
2015 .08
-
의결권행사자문회사 관련 규제론에 대한 재고 － 주주가치의 확대를 위한 의결권행사자문회사의 역할을 기대하며 －
경영법률
2016 .01
-
의결권자문기관의 객관성과 책임성 확보방안
경제법연구
2019 .01
-
지분의 은폐와 법적 규제
한양법학
2016 .02
-
뇌성마비 환아 중증도별 시각화척도, 시간교환법, EQ-5D-Y Proxy를 이용한 삶의 질 측정
동의신경정신과학회지
2017 .01
-
중국 농촌 기층(基層) 거버넌스 법치화의 진로 탐색 - 촌민위원회에 있어서 위탁투표제도를 중심으로 -
법학연구
2022 .12
-
기관투자자의 주주권행사에 대한 법률적 제약에 관한 연구
법학평론
2018 .04
-
코로나19와 의회 대리투표: 대리투표소송의 쟁점
일감법학
2021 .01
-
의결권구속계약의 효력과 쟁송 방법에 관한 고찰
사법
2024 .09
-
의결권 신탁(voting trust)의 자본시장 활용 및 규제
증권법연구
2018 .08
-
차등의결권제도의 도입과 상장
기업법연구
2015 .09
-
중국 차등의결권 제도에 관한 소고 - 커촹반의 사례를 중심으로
한중사회과학연구
2020 .01
-
주주의 의결권행사에 있어서 철회의 자유와 제한
법과기업연구
2015 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
스튜어드십 코드가 기관투자자의 의결권 행사에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
김선민
,
박경서
,
정찬식
한국증권학회지
2020
.08
2020정기주총 국민연금 의결권 행사와 개선과제 - 위탁운용사 위임행사의 문제점을 중심으로
이승희
이슈&분석
2020
.05
스튜어드십 코드 도입 기관투자자 의결권행사 분석 : 2019년 3월 정기주주총회
이승희
이슈&분석
2019
.06
스튜어드십 코드 도입 기관투자자들의 의결권행사 분석 : 의결권자문사 반대권고 안건을 중심으로
이승희
이슈&분석
2019
.02
의결권 신탁(voting trust)의 자본시장 활용 및 규제
엄세용
증권법연구
2018
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-360-001860907