메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이예진 (한국기술교육대학교) 홍주표 (한국기술교육대학교) 정광태 (한국기술교육대학교)
저널정보
대한인간공학회 대한인간공학회지 대한인간공학회지 제41권 제2호
발행연도
2022.4
수록면
141 - 150 (10page)
DOI
10.5143/JESK.2022.41.2.141

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objective: This study was conducted for the purpose of proposing a method to evaluate user experience for a system using a multi-criteria decision making model based on the evaluation factors of user experience.
Background: User experience refers to a direct or indirect experience that a user obtains in the process of using a product or service. As various digital products and services become popular and competition intensifies in modern life, user experience is becoming more and more important. Various studies have been attempted to evaluate user experience according to such necessity. Since the user experience that an individual has for the same system can be different, it is important how the user experience evaluation of the system incorporates this subjectivity.
Method: In this study, a method to obtain the user experience score was proposed by using importance weights of the user experience evaluation criteria and averaging the scores for each evaluation criterion of the system. To this end, we first determined the criteria for evaluating user experience based on the honeycomb model. AHP was used as a method to derive the relative importance weight of evaluation criteria. In addition, a Likert scale from 1 to 5 was used to give a rating for the user experience evaluation criteria.
Results: In order to examine the applicability of the method proposed in this study, it was applied to the user experience evaluation problem for car rental websites. In this study, "useful, usable, findable, credible, desirable, accessible, and valuable" presented in the honeycomb model were used as user experience evaluation criteria. Both the UX score and the SUS score showed a statistically significant difference at the significance level of 0.05 for each of the three car rental websites. A similar pattern was also observed in the average score. And the UX score showed a significant correlation with the SUS score of 0.509.
Conclusion: User experience evaluation using the multi-criteria decision-making method showed a high correlation with SUS, which has been used as an effective usability evaluation method in many studies. From this fact, it can be seen that the user experience evaluation method proposed in this study can be effectively applied to the user experience evaluation problem of a system.
Application: The results of this study could be used as a method to evaluate user experience on a digital system.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Application
4. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0