메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김수산나 (경희대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제31권 제5호 (인문사회과학 편)
발행연도
2022.10
수록면
475 - 494 (20page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2022.10.31.5.475

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study was conducted by the following procedures to develop and validate a scale of job competences of performing art planners. First, with the valid samples of 109 persons of performing arts, a preliminary survey was conducted to draw the necessity of research. Second, a primary survey was conducted with 10 experts in performing arts, including professors of graduate schools of performing arts, doctors of performing arts studies, and the representatives of performance planning organizations to draw the results through the verification of content validity. Third, a secondary survey was conducted with the valid samples of 182 persons in the fields of performing arts, including theater, opera, musical, dance, music, and stage production arts to verify the validity and drew the following research results. Performing art planner’s job competencies were developed with a scale of a total 34 questions. As for the detailed areas, findings were presented with eight work profession questions, three qualification and character questions, five personnel management questions, six leadership questions, five fund-raising and financial management questions, and seven marketing area questions.
This study was conducted with the following research methods. First, by descriptive statistics for questions, this study checked the normality with mean, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis. Second, this study investigated the reliability, calculating question-total score correlation, Cronbach’s α and checked the factor structure of the scale with exploratory factor analysis. Third, this study drew up a measurement model for the scale and conducted confirmatory factor analysis to come up with the final model. Based on this, this study verified concept reliability, convergence validity, and discrimination validity to investigate the validity and checked cross validity. As for the analysis tools, SPSS 25 and AMOS 25 were employed.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0