메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject
Humanities
General Humanities History Philosophy Religious Studies Linguistics and Literature Other Humanities
Social science
General Social Science Business Management Tourism Education Military Science Library and Information Science Law Sociology Journalism and Media Studies Psychological Science Political Science and Diplomacy Geography Public Administration Economics International Trade Anthropology Other Social Science
Natural science
General Natural Science Physics Biology Life Sciences Mathematics/Statistics Astronomy Earth Science Chemistry Other Natural Science
Engineering
General Engineering Architectural Engineering Mechanical Engineering Industrial Engineering Material/Energy Engineering Electrical and Electronic Engineering Marine and Ocean Engineering Chemical Engineering Computer Science Other Engineering
Medical science
General Medical Science Nursing Science Veterinary Pharmacy Traditional Korean Medicine Basic Medicine Clinical Medicine Other Medicine
Agriculture and Fishery
General Agriculture and Fishery Agriculture Fishery Science Food Science Forestry Animal Husbandry Marine Transportation Studies Other Agriculture and Fishery
Art and Kinesiology
General Arts Design Fine Arts Cosmetology Photography Music Fashion Kinesiology Performing Media Arts Other Arts and Kinesiology
Interdisciplinary Studies
Interdisciplinary Research Science and Technology Studies Brain and Cognitive Science Technology Policy Other Interdisciplinary Studies

KOR

Permissible scope of communication data acquisition under Article 83(3) of the Telecommunications Business Act : Analyzing the decision of the Constitutional Court on the 2016Heonma388 etc. merged cases of July 21, 2022
Recommendations
Search
Questions

전기통신사업법 제83조 제3항에 따른 통신자료 취득행위의 허용 범위 : 2022년 7월 21일 2016헌마388 등 병합사건에 대한 헌법재판소의 결정을 분석하며

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Jungnyum Lee (숭실대학교)
Journal
Law Research Institute Chonbuk National University Jeonbuk Law Review Wn.69 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2022.9
Pages
121 - 145 (25page)
DOI
10.56544/JBLR.2022.09.69.121

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Permissible scope of communication data acquisition under Article 83(3) of the Telecommunications Business Act : Analyzing the decision of the Constitutional Court on the 2016Heonma388 etc. merged cases of July 21, 2022
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
According to the Telecommunications Business Act, a court, a prosecutor, the head of an investigative agency, or the head of an intelligence and investigation agency etc. (hereinafter referred to as “investigation agency etc.”) may acquire the communications data - namely, names of users, resident registration numbers of users, addresses of users, phone numbers of users, user ID, dates on which users subscribe or terminate their subscriptions - from a telecommunications business operator. The communication data acquisition by investigative agency etc. is possible for trial, investigation, execution of punishment, or collection of information for the prevention of harm to national security. There are some debates on the violation of fundamental rights, because the communication data is acquired without a warrant or consent of the information subject. Under these circumstances, it is noteworthy that the Constitutional Court decided on July 21, 2022 in South Korea that the acquisition of communication data by investigative agency etc. based on Article 83(3) of the Telecommunications Business Act does not in itself violate the Constitution.
This article critically analyzes the recent decision of the Constitutional Court, focusing on the protection of fundamental rights, including the right to self-determination of personal information of information subjects. In detail, this article reviews the subject and scope of the communication data acquisition and the characteristics of the communication data acquisition act, and argues that there is a need for control over the communication data acquisition by investigative agency etc. under Article 83(3) of the Telecommunications Business Act. In conclusion, this article suggests legislative mechanisms to more clearly set the permissible scope of communication data acquisition by investigation agency etc.
#전기통신사업법 #정보주체 #통신자료 #개인정보자기결정권 #헌법소원 #Telecommunications Business Act #Information subject #Communication data #Right to self-determination of personal information #Constitutional complaint

Contents

국문초록
I. 들어가는 글
II. 전기통신사업법상 통신자료 취득행위에 대한 최근 헌법재판소의 결정
III. 2016헌마388 등 병합사건에 대한 헌법재판소의 결정 분석
IV. 전기통신사업법 제83조 제3항에 대한 헌법재판소 결정의 한계
V. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

References (0)

Add References
If the reference is being serviced by DBpia, please register through [Add Reference]

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Recently viewed articles

Association between Self-Reported Sleep Duration and Depression or Suicidal ideation in Korean Adolescents
Eunhee LeeKorean Academy of Anxiety Disorders2018
 The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Labor Relations - Labor-management Conflict Issues and Union Strategies in Western Advanced Countries -
Byoung-Hoon LeeKorean Association of Social Policy2018.06
 20주년을 되돌아보며 농촌사회학의 미래를 생각한다
조옥라, 김일철, 정명채 외 2명The Korea Rural Sociological Society2010.12
 DPRK’s Recycling Policy and Circular Economy
Yoonjung Oh, Sunsong ParkKorea Environmental Policy And Administration Society2023.03

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.