메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
길용원 (광운대학교)
저널정보
중앙대학교 법학연구원 法學論文集 法學論文集 제41권 제2호
발행연도
2017.8
수록면
201 - 232 (32page)
DOI
10.22853/caujls.2017.41.2.201

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Tax evader is a highly charged crime that infringes on the tax burden imposed on others by acting as an actor who violates the taxation obligation of the Constitution. The Act on the Punishment of Tax Service stipulates punishment on acts of taxation evasion. Especially to the contents of the Fraud and Other Unlawful Activities. This case is problematic if the act of taxation is subjected to tax evasion, prevents only of the collection act. The first court recognized the act of portals, but the second court denied it. The majority opinion of the Supreme Court was limited. In order to judge whether or not it is tax evasion, it is necessary to comprehensively review the concepts, protection interests, specification of an act of committing a crime, and consummated time. Collectively, it should be judged whether or not it is Unlawful Activities. Recently, the Supreme Court has widely judged the extent of Unlawful Activities. It is concentrating on aggressive concealment intention. In addition, the judgment of Unlawful Activities should be considered in terms of practical aspects rather than in formal aspects. If we judge uniformly, there is a possibility of causing the failure of national finances. A substantive judgment is required to prevent tax evasion on new forms of trade. The decision suggests a broader interpretation of the extent to which Fraud and Other Unlawful Activities of tax payment by self-assessment are more widespread than ever before

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (35)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0