메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
장운욱 (연세대학교) 강용주 (연세대학교)
저널정보
아시아.유럽미래학회 유라시아연구 유라시아연구 제13권 제2호
발행연도
2016.6
수록면
155 - 180 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper represents an attempt at empirically assessing the applicability of the Fama and French five-factor model in explaining the cross-sectional variation of stock returns for the South Korean market. The Fama and French (2015) five-factor model is an augmentation of the existing and widely recognized Fama and French (1993) three-factor asset pricing model that incorporates two additional factors, namely the profitability and investment factors. Although the three-factor model has been shown to explain the cross-section of stock return for the U.S. and other developed countries reasonably well, it has not had much success in explaining the cross-section of stock returns for the Korean market. Many researchers have since sought to identify alternative asset pricing models that could serve as the benchmark empirical asset pricing model that would be more applicable for Korea. Along the same lines, the analysis conducted in this paper hopes to test if the revised five-factor model that incorporates the profitability and investment factors is able to alleviate some of the issues the three-factor model has had in explaining the cross-section of stock returns for Korea. Monthly returns on common stocks of non-financial firms listed on the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) as well as the relevant accounting information were obtained for the 1992~2013 period. This data was used to obtain the Size (market capitalization), B/M (book-to-market), OP (operating profitability), and Inv (investment) variables, which are subsequently used to obtain the Size-B/M, Size-OP, and Size-Inv portfolios. In order to investigate the Size-B/M, Size-OP, and Size-Inv effects, we construct portfolios by independently sorting firms into four groups for each of the two variables under observation (three 4x4 independently sorted factor portfolios), similar to the way in which Fama and French (1993) constructed their Size-B/M portfolios. Following the methodology outlined in Fama and French (2015), the Size-B/M, Size-OP and Size-Inv patterns in average returns were first examined in order to determine if the size, value, profitability and investment effects can be explained. The average excess returns for portfolios formed on Size-B/M, Size-OP, and Size-Inv displayed patterns that we expected them to have, whereby average excess return decreases with Size and investment but increases with B/M and profitability. These results showed that the spread in average excess returns for our sample of Korean stock returns exhibits patterns that are in line with the five factors used in the model. In order to estimate the magnitude of the risk premium associated with the size, value, profitability and investment effects, factor mimicking portfolios designed to capture the impact of the various effects were constructed, similar to the methodology used by Fama and French (1993, and 2015). The five constructed mimicking portfolios consists of the MKT, SMB, HML, RMW, and CMA factors whereby MKT represents the market risk premium factor, SMB represents the size factor (Small-Minus-Big), HML represents the value factor (High-Minus-Low), RMW represents the profitability factor (Robust- Minus-Weak), and CMA represents the investment factor (Conservative-Minus-Aggressive). Using these factors, cross-sectional regressions based on the Fama and MacBeth methodology (1973) were conducted on the Size-B/M, Size-OP and Size-Inv value-weighted portfolios in order to determine model performance by looking at the intercepts and relevant slopes for the three (MKT, SMB, and HML) or five factors (MKT, SMB, HML, RMW, and CMA) depending on the model used. The results of the Fama-MacBeth regressions conducted using the Size-B/M, Size-OP and Size-Inv test assets for the three-factor and five-factor models show that the only statistically significant factor risk premium for both models regardless of the test asset used is the SMB. Consistent with the results obtained in prior research, the factor risk premium for HML is shown to be insignificant. Although the results could have been driven by the use of a different time period that incorporates the 2007~2008 financial crisis in the analysis, with the exception of the Size-OP test assets, the pricing error () for the cross-sectional regressions shows up as being significantly different from zero, suggesting that both the Fama and French three-and five-factor models should be rejected. Comparing between the Fama and French three- and five-factor models, it is evident from the results that the five-factor model fares equally poorly as the three-factor model in explaining the cross-sectional variation of stock returns for the Korean market and the addition of the profitability and investment factors does not help to improve the performance of the model. Hence, there is insufficient empirical evidence that would support the use of either factor models as a benchmark asset pricing model for the Korean stock market. However, the analysis conducted in this paper has its limitations and represents only an initial attempt at assessing the applicability of the Fama and French five-factor model. In order to reach a more definitive conclusion, an expanded and more comprehensive analysis would be required and is left as a suggestion for future research.
#Fama-French Factors #Asset Pricing #Factor Models #Korean Stock Market

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청
Aharoni, G. / 2013 / Stock Returns and the Miller Modigliani Valuation Formula: Revisiting the Fama French Analysis / Journal of Financial Economics 110:347~357 google schola Asparouhova, E. / 2013 / Noisy Prices and Inference Regarding Returns / The Journal of Finance 68:665~714 google schola Banz, R. W. / 1981 / The Relation between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks / Journal of Financial Economics 9:3~18 google schola Basu, S. / 1983 / The Relationship between Earning Yield, Market Value, and Return for NYSE Common Stocks : Further Evidence / Journal of Financial Economics 12:129~156 google schola Carhart, M. M. / 1997 / On the Persistence of Mutual Fund Performance / The Journal of Finance 52:57~87 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0