메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Differences in Task Value and Future Time Perspective According to the Latent Profiles Analysis of Academic Procrastination, Academic Self-efficacy, and Learning Flow in College Students
Recommendations
Search
Questions

대학생의 학업지연행동, 학업적 자기효능감, 학습몰입의 잠재프로파일 분류에 따른 과제가치 및 미래지향시간관의 차이

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Se-Hee Bae Hye-Seon Yeom (신라대학교)
Journal
The Research Institue of Korean Education Korean Education Inquiry Vol.42 No.3 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2024.9
Pages
59 - 85 (27page)
DOI
10.22327/kei.2024.42.3.059

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Differences in Task Value and Future Time Perspective According to the Latent Profiles Analysis of Academic Procrastination, Academic Self-efficacy, and Learning Flow in College Students
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in task value and future-oriented time perspective according to the profiles of college students’ academic procrastination, academic self-efficacy, and learning flow. The subjects were 351 students from universities located in Gyeongbuk and Gyeongnam. For data, latent profile analysis and one-way ANOVA were performed. The main results are as follows. First, "the Non-Procrastination Group" showed the lowest level of passive and active procrastination and the highest academic self-efficacy and learning flow. Second, "the Active-Procrastination Group" had the lowest passive procrastination after the Non-Procrastination Group, but had the highest level of active procrastination, and was second only to the Non-Procrastination Group in academic self-efficacy and learning flow. Third, in “the Mixed-Type Group”, both passive and active procrastination showed average levels, and the academic self-efficacy and learning flow were higher than those of the Passive-Procrastination Group, but lower than those of the Active and Non-Procrastination Groups. Fourth, “the Passive Procrastination Group” showed the highest level of passive procrastination, followed by the Non-Procrastination Group in active procrastination, and had the lowest level of academic self-efficacy and learning flow. As a result of the task value and the future time perspective according to the latent profile classified as the next, "the Non-Procrastination Group" showed the highest level in the task value and the latent time perspective.

Contents

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-090887843