지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As it was interconnected with the Cold War status of a global scale, the Korean War gave us one of the most vivid demonstrations of clashes between ideologies in recent history. Naturally in a war with such nature, the opponents not only used armies and weapons. They resorted to psychological warfare and tactics utilizing propaganda as well. Literally, the combatants made up images and spreaded them.
In this research, the leaflets deployed and distributed by the UN forces, the North Korean army and the Chinese communist forces are mainly examined. Although the research would concentrate more on the US army's tactics of psychological warfare, the primary objective for this research is to determine what kind of 'Images of War' were produced, and what were the mindsets behind such creations. By conducting such research, we would be able to identify the official ideologies that the combatants wanted to force the general public to accept. We would also be able to figure out how such images and ideologies were accepted and processed in the general public's mind. And in the end, we should be able to determine how people with war experiences got to possess and maintain memories regarding certain events that happened during the war.
Leaflets were distinctively important methods used in psychological warfare. The US army had distributed more than 25 billion pieces of leaflet since the war began and till the truce was made. Those leaflets were designed to provide personal incentives to the recipients or persuade them to have second thoughts about their status in terms of ideological preferences. The former included examples of sun-ender passes or suggestions of good treatment to the potential prisoners of war. The latter contained stories with themes such as the supposed harsh treatment of the public committed by Communist regimes, or criticism against North Korea and China for being the so-called 'Puppet regimes' of the Soviet Russia.
The theory of a fake, 'false Kim Il Sung' is a typical form of the latter. This theory was created during the time period when the US army set up a military government in Korea, and was spreaded during the Korean war by US Army Far East Command. US also started to depict China as a puppet of USSR after the Communization of China. The Secretary of State Department Dean Rusk openly said on May 1951 thar the People's Republic of China was merely a 'Slavic Manchukuo'. The fact that a theory of this nature was included even in the report of the Far East Command strongly suggests that the US army was in political need of the image of Kim Il Sung being nothing but a false figure. This image, and the intentions surrounding its creation, clearly demonstrates a Cold War mentality, and we can see that US had to maintain that image because of its own political and economical interests.
Many American social scientists, especially the behavioral scientists, contributed to the us army's creation of a 'Cold War Enemy'. These people served as consultants for the us army, and played an instrumental role in applying psychological warfare tactics based on behavioral science developed during the World War II, to the Korean war that in tum provided the American community of social scientists with the very first opportunity to study the Communist society firsthand. American social scientists studied the Korth Korean society through the Sovietization theory, and created images of the NK based on that theory.
Korean war is mostly remembered as a ideological walfare. As the war progressed, the ideological and international nature of the war became more and more apparent, and in the end ideological propaganda became a more important issue than any other things, even including the outcome of the actual war. Korean war served as a battle field of an international scale which required the combatants to playa psychological warfare for their ideology and interest. This led to the enforcement of Anti-Communism sentimentality inside the Korean society, and the sentimentality's hatching numerous political images.
In this research, the leaflets deployed and distributed by the UN forces, the North Korean army and the Chinese communist forces are mainly examined. Although the research would concentrate more on the US army's tactics of psychological warfare, the primary objective for this research is to determine what kind of 'Images of War' were produced, and what were the mindsets behind such creations. By conducting such research, we would be able to identify the official ideologies that the combatants wanted to force the general public to accept. We would also be able to figure out how such images and ideologies were accepted and processed in the general public's mind. And in the end, we should be able to determine how people with war experiences got to possess and maintain memories regarding certain events that happened during the war.
Leaflets were distinctively important methods used in psychological warfare. The US army had distributed more than 25 billion pieces of leaflet since the war began and till the truce was made. Those leaflets were designed to provide personal incentives to the recipients or persuade them to have second thoughts about their status in terms of ideological preferences. The former included examples of sun-ender passes or suggestions of good treatment to the potential prisoners of war. The latter contained stories with themes such as the supposed harsh treatment of the public committed by Communist regimes, or criticism against North Korea and China for being the so-called 'Puppet regimes' of the Soviet Russia.
The theory of a fake, 'false Kim Il Sung' is a typical form of the latter. This theory was created during the time period when the US army set up a military government in Korea, and was spreaded during the Korean war by US Army Far East Command. US also started to depict China as a puppet of USSR after the Communization of China. The Secretary of State Department Dean Rusk openly said on May 1951 thar the People's Republic of China was merely a 'Slavic Manchukuo'. The fact that a theory of this nature was included even in the report of the Far East Command strongly suggests that the US army was in political need of the image of Kim Il Sung being nothing but a false figure. This image, and the intentions surrounding its creation, clearly demonstrates a Cold War mentality, and we can see that US had to maintain that image because of its own political and economical interests.
Many American social scientists, especially the behavioral scientists, contributed to the us army's creation of a 'Cold War Enemy'. These people served as consultants for the us army, and played an instrumental role in applying psychological warfare tactics based on behavioral science developed during the World War II, to the Korean war that in tum provided the American community of social scientists with the very first opportunity to study the Communist society firsthand. American social scientists studied the Korth Korean society through the Sovietization theory, and created images of the NK based on that theory.
Korean war is mostly remembered as a ideological walfare. As the war progressed, the ideological and international nature of the war became more and more apparent, and in the end ideological propaganda became a more important issue than any other things, even including the outcome of the actual war. Korean war served as a battle field of an international scale which required the combatants to playa psychological warfare for their ideology and interest. This led to the enforcement of Anti-Communism sentimentality inside the Korean society, and the sentimentality's hatching numerous political images.
목차
머리말
1. 6·25전쟁기 심리전과 삐라
2. 삐라, 이미지 전쟁, 이데올로기
3. 심리전의 인식론
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Leaflets, and the Nature of the Korean War as Psychological Warfare
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2004 .09
-
The Korean War 1950-1953
Korea Journal
1967 .07
-
한국전쟁기 전쟁시의 국가주의의 시선
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
한국전쟁의 기본개념으로서 제한전(limited war)의 성립과 분화 : 한반도에 대한 전략적 가치 평가와 관련하여
한국사연구
2004 .06
-
한국전쟁 60년, 한반도와 세계
역사비평
2010 .05
-
한국전쟁기 38선 북진과 냉전의 고착화
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .12
-
‘전쟁의 기억’과 ‘기억의 전쟁’ : 특별한 피난체험을 중심으로
통일인문학
2014 .03
-
냉전 초기 사회주의진영 내부의 전쟁·평화 담론의 충돌과 북한의 한국전쟁 인식 변화
역사와현실
2012 .03
-
한국전쟁기 남북한 전쟁소설의 특성-한국군과 북한군의 형상화 양상을 중심으로
한국현대문학연구
2003 .12
-
한국 전쟁영화의 발전과 특징 : 한국전쟁에서 베트남전쟁까지
지방사와 지방문화
2006 .11
-
사상심리전의 텍스트로서 한국전쟁 : 자유세계로의 확산과 동아시아적 귀환
역사비평
2017 .02
-
Literature After the Korean War
Korea Journal
1977 .06
-
한국전쟁과 여성 : 경계에 선 여성들
역사비평
2010 .05
-
냉전의 다양한 모습
역사비평
2013 .11
-
영화를 통해 본 냉전 : 1950/60년대 동독 냉전 영화를 중심으로
역사학보
2008 .03
-
재한 서구 개신교 선교사와 제1차 세계대전 : 「한국선교지(Korea Mission Field)」를 중심으로
신학연구
2014 .12
-
한국소설에 나타난 베트남 전쟁의 특성과 참전 한국군의 정체성
한국현대문학연구
2003 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-013793505