지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The socioeconomic regulatory model that had underpinned labour law since the beginning of the twentieth century is in the throes of a crisis. Important national differences aside, that industrial model may be ideally or typically described as a regulatory framework which depends on a standardized form of subordination, the widespread nuclear family and the institutionalization of the parties who have an interest in collective bargaining, all within a national state.
From an institutional standpoint, this model may be seen as a triangle whose three sides are companies, trade unions, and the state. But now we cannot fail to see that all three sides of that triangles are collasping. The internal reorganization of businesses has altered the distinction between design and implementation, particularly as a result of the emergence of production dedicated more to non-standard goods; as a consequence, employment relationships have become more flexible, involving long or continuning worker training. Women have entered the labour market en masse, thereby undermining the patriarchal Fordist model. Stable employment is being replaced by more casual working arrangements which are not defined exclusively in terms of job or position. Trade unions, in turn, in the face of the unemployment brought about by the economic crisis, have been obliged to redifine their role: no longer concerned solely with male wages and working conditions, they also deal with issues such as employment, company survival, and gender equality. Finally, the State has abandoned its Keynsian policies in favour of antiinflationary strategies and budgetary control, turning its attention to maintaining competitive conditions.
Therefore labor law receives the epoch of conversion. Traditional labor law is forced by the change of social fundamental as background. However traditional notion of labor law, worker's protection caused paralysis of domestic theory of labor law. Labor law that one of the subsystem support a ordinary operation is a part of legal system. In a broad sense, labor market system is prescribed in the law.
Especially, considering the economic efficiency, uniform and strict regulation of the employee dismissal should be lessened. And from now on, in the standpoint of the corporation, legal principle of the employee dismissal regulation should be changed. In a broad sense, the employment is created by outside of corporation even if there is a limit on the assumption of corporation. The theory of corporate governance as take a serious view of stock holder's interest is a potential of change taken notice of importance in a outside corporation employment.
From an institutional standpoint, this model may be seen as a triangle whose three sides are companies, trade unions, and the state. But now we cannot fail to see that all three sides of that triangles are collasping. The internal reorganization of businesses has altered the distinction between design and implementation, particularly as a result of the emergence of production dedicated more to non-standard goods; as a consequence, employment relationships have become more flexible, involving long or continuning worker training. Women have entered the labour market en masse, thereby undermining the patriarchal Fordist model. Stable employment is being replaced by more casual working arrangements which are not defined exclusively in terms of job or position. Trade unions, in turn, in the face of the unemployment brought about by the economic crisis, have been obliged to redifine their role: no longer concerned solely with male wages and working conditions, they also deal with issues such as employment, company survival, and gender equality. Finally, the State has abandoned its Keynsian policies in favour of antiinflationary strategies and budgetary control, turning its attention to maintaining competitive conditions.
Therefore labor law receives the epoch of conversion. Traditional labor law is forced by the change of social fundamental as background. However traditional notion of labor law, worker's protection caused paralysis of domestic theory of labor law. Labor law that one of the subsystem support a ordinary operation is a part of legal system. In a broad sense, labor market system is prescribed in the law.
Especially, considering the economic efficiency, uniform and strict regulation of the employee dismissal should be lessened. And from now on, in the standpoint of the corporation, legal principle of the employee dismissal regulation should be changed. In a broad sense, the employment is created by outside of corporation even if there is a limit on the assumption of corporation. The theory of corporate governance as take a serious view of stock holder's interest is a potential of change taken notice of importance in a outside corporation employment.
목차
Ⅰ. 노동법의 유연화
Ⅱ. 해고규제의 의의와 해고규제완화
Ⅲ. 기업지배구조를 전제로 한 새로운 시각의 도입필요성(기업이미지의 변화와 해고법리의 전환)
Ⅳ. 결론에 갈음하여
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
노동시장의 환경변화와 고용정책법제의 대응과제 - 외부노동시장의 개별근로자 지원을 위한 고용정책법의 기본원리와 직업능력개발을 중심으로 -
노동법학
2005 .06
-
노동권의 현대적 재해석과 고용보장법
노동법논총
2004 .02
-
시대변혁기에 있어서 노동법의 역할
노동법포럼
2017 .02
-
미국의 해고법제(dismissal laws) 하에서 파견고용 관계의 전개
노동법논총
2014 .12
-
일본 노동법제의 최근 동향 : 노동기준법ㆍ파견법ㆍ직업안정법의 개정동향을 중심으로
노동법논총
2004 .02
-
가사도우미, 요양보호사, 유통업체 판매직 근로관계의 특성과 노동법의 실효적인 규율 방향
노동법논총
2015 .04
-
노사자치의 한계와 노동법적 규제의 정당성
노동법학
2004 .12
-
노동시장정책과 쟁점 검토
노동법논총
2015 .08
-
고용과 관계된 법과 정책에 대한 소고 : 해고법제의 정당성을 중심으로
노동법논총
2003 .02
-
근로계약법 제정과 적용대상에 관한 고찰
노동법논총
2008 .12
-
해고규제완화에 관한 연구
규제연구
2004 .06
-
근로계약법제의 현대적 과제
법학논집
2005 .01
-
글로벌리제이션과 노동법의 변화에 대한 비교연구
지역사회연구
2007 .12
-
근로계약법의 입법화를 둘러싼 일본에서의 최근 논의
기업법연구
2007 .03
-
사립대학 교직원의 노동법 및 사회보장법상의 지위
노동법논총
2013 .12
-
고용환경의 변화, 노동법의 위기와 대응 : 노동보호법의 인적 적용범위를 중심으로
노동법학
2018 .09
-
기업경영과 노동법제 개선방안
경영법률
2009 .01
-
한국의 근로계약법제의 현황과 과제
노동법학
2009 .12
-
고용유연화와 관련된 한국의 노동법제 현황과 쟁점 재검토
노동법논총
2014 .12
-
전환기의 노사관계와 노동법
한림법학 FORUM
2003 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
경제위기와 노동시장 유연화
금재호
한국노사관계학회 정책세미나
2009
.03
저성과자 퇴출 프로그램을 시행하는 사업주에 대한 고용유지지원금 지급의 부당성 : 대법원 2012. 12. 13. 선고 2011두25340 판결
노호창
노동법학
2013
.03
노동시장의 유연화와 국가의 전략적 선택
한종희
,
하재룡
한국정책과학학회보
2001
.12
해고규제의 올바른 모습에 관한 시론
김희성
노동법논총
2011
.12
일반해고의 정당성 판단에 대한 판례법리의 검토 : 저성과자에 대한 해고의 정당성 판단을 중심으로
김승휘
강원법학
2012
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-336-014091334