지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Modern women writers attempt to question and develop discussion over the nature and existence of women itself as well as the modern society, through the communication with other writers of the past. For this purpose, they choose the method of "intertextualitv".
What modern female writers would like to find through the intertextuality is to point out existing stereotype of a woman in the literature or literature flaws about the life of a women itself, and correct them. They attempt to reposition a woman as a real figure who has been seen as idealized and secondary. To achieve their goal, modern female writers choose the third person, the traditional Russian Literature, as their communication partner. L. Ulitskaia also attempts communication with A. Pushkin by parodying his works.
Ulitskaia never beautifies the life, rather examine the real life in detail. Also, the figures in her works are neither beautiful nor common. Critics view her works as close to naturalism and assume her creation method is related to her major, biology. Such characteristics of Ulitskaia's creation is well illustrated in her work The Queen of Spades which shares the same title of Pushkin's. In the work, The Queen of Spades, she attempts to challenge and distort the authority and reasoning of Pushkin by elaborating the lives of women in detail which is not quite beautiful or sophisticated. The method of Parody here is the tool to establish alternative authority of parodists against that of architext.
The writing style of Ulitskaia is that of fiction's imitation of reality. From this perspective, her writing style is self-reflexive in that it let us reflect and re-appreciate Pushkin's writing. It also explores the doubtful relationship between reality and fiction by showing Pushkin's tradition and exploring the artificial situations created by Pushkin. Text of Pushkin which is fantastic and romantic, but closed, is open to the world through the figures in the Pushkin's work who are combined in Anna, and through the real relationship between Anna and Mur, and intervention of readers to her tragic destiny. Inter-communications among Pushkin-Ulitskaia-readers enable the re-appreciation and re-consideration of the people, reality, and identity of not only contemporary Russia but the times of Pushkin.
What modern female writers would like to find through the intertextuality is to point out existing stereotype of a woman in the literature or literature flaws about the life of a women itself, and correct them. They attempt to reposition a woman as a real figure who has been seen as idealized and secondary. To achieve their goal, modern female writers choose the third person, the traditional Russian Literature, as their communication partner. L. Ulitskaia also attempts communication with A. Pushkin by parodying his works.
Ulitskaia never beautifies the life, rather examine the real life in detail. Also, the figures in her works are neither beautiful nor common. Critics view her works as close to naturalism and assume her creation method is related to her major, biology. Such characteristics of Ulitskaia's creation is well illustrated in her work The Queen of Spades which shares the same title of Pushkin's. In the work, The Queen of Spades, she attempts to challenge and distort the authority and reasoning of Pushkin by elaborating the lives of women in detail which is not quite beautiful or sophisticated. The method of Parody here is the tool to establish alternative authority of parodists against that of architext.
The writing style of Ulitskaia is that of fiction's imitation of reality. From this perspective, her writing style is self-reflexive in that it let us reflect and re-appreciate Pushkin's writing. It also explores the doubtful relationship between reality and fiction by showing Pushkin's tradition and exploring the artificial situations created by Pushkin. Text of Pushkin which is fantastic and romantic, but closed, is open to the world through the figures in the Pushkin's work who are combined in Anna, and through the real relationship between Anna and Mur, and intervention of readers to her tragic destiny. Inter-communications among Pushkin-Ulitskaia-readers enable the re-appreciation and re-consideration of the people, reality, and identity of not only contemporary Russia but the times of Pushkin.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 글
Ⅱ. 스페이드 여왕의 흡수와 변형
Ⅲ. 안나 형상 속의 모방과 변주
Ⅳ. 닫힘에서 열림으로의 전환
Ⅴ. 끝맺는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
К размышлению о мировоззрении Пушкина: “Праздник жизни” или “степь” жизни?
외국학연구
2013 .01
-
Folklore in A. S. Pushkin’s Works- A Bibliography for Building Pushkin House-of-Folklore -
슬라브硏究
2005 .01
-
불가코프의 푸시킨: 거장과 마르가리타 속 푸시킨의 형상과 작품들
러시아어문학연구논집
2016 .01
-
К истории пушкиноведения: Л.С. Сидяков и его последний труд
러시아어문학연구논집
2012 .01
-
『바흐치사라이 분수』에 나타난 낭만주의적 서사의 역동성과 침묵의 미학
외국문학연구
2005 .11
-
안드레이 비토프의 『푸쉬킨 연구소』와 부조리 문학
슬라브학보
2018 .06
-
뿌쉬낀의 산문론과 문학 이론의 적용성 : “눈보라”를 중심으로
슬라브학보
2008 .03
-
푸슈킨의 석상손님 다시 읽기 -레포렐로-푸슈킨의 내적 드라마-
러시아어문학연구논집
2005 .01
-
스페이드 여왕에서의 환상과 현실
러시아어문학연구논집
2005 .01
-
도블라토프의 『보호구』 : 푸시킨의 "손으로 만들어진 기념비"
슬라브硏究
2013 .01
-
이브의 깨진 거울: 왜곡된 형상 바로잡기 : 뿌쉬낀과의 상호텍스트성을 중심으로
노어노문학
2006 .08
-
작가-푸슈킨과 화가-푸슈킨의 대화
외국문학연구
2010 .08
-
푸슈킨과 차아다예프, 그리고 제카브리스트 : 러시아 ‘아리온’의 운명과 애도의 시학
슬라브학보
2006 .09
-
푸시킨 서사시 「카프카즈의 포로」의 문학사적 의의에 관하여
러시아어문학연구논집
2019 .01
-
푸슈킨 공동체로서의 러시아 : 푸슈킨의 신화화와 탈신화화
노어노문학
2009 .09
-
The Indifference of Nature in Pushkin, Tiutchev, and Chekhov
한국노어노문학회 학술대회 발표집
2004 .09
-
뿌슈낀의 작품에 나타난 낭만적 악마성에 대하여
러시아어문학연구논집
2004 .01
-
뿌쉬낀의 기독교와 ‘탈기독교문학’의 문제 : 《벨낀 이야기》를 중심으로
노어노문학
2007 .12
-
예브게니야 긴즈부르그의 험난한 여정에 나타난 푸시킨 형상 연구
외국학연구
2020 .01
-
뿌쉬낀의 희곡 『보리스 고두노프』와 오태석의 희곡 「태」 비교 연구
동서비교문학저널
2013 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-892-014916613