지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Good corporate governance encourages voluntary choice in markets. Corporate laws protecting related interest parties are, therefore, a most effective way in shaping corporate governance structures.
More specially, corporate laws should minimize the compulsory clauses to protect interest groups, allowing more discretion to management and to induce efficient management decisions.
On the other hands, is also needs to provide outside shareholders an opportunity to better understand the problems of corporate governance of companies, to prevent arbitrary decisions of a large shareholders and the lack of transparency.
Restrictions on Equity Investment(ROI) regulates that any corporation belonging to a designated business corporation group shall be prohibited from acquiring or owning stocks of another domistic companies in excess of 40 % of its asset.
The system was enacted prevent dominent share holders(Chae-bul) from pursuing their private interest through the small investment into their subsidiaries, and to improve the corporate governance.
In this study, I consider the history, the policies and the contents of the ROI as well as its problems, substitution countermeasures. Specially, I put emphasis on trying to find out the problems of ROI and the substitution countermeasures for this system.
This paper critically reviws the rationale of ROI provided in Lim(2003), and also the proposal by the Korea Fair Trade Commision(KFTC) to base regulation using th "Indices of Ownership Control Disparity(IOCD). I find that IOCD is problematic if it is used as a criterion for exempting firms from ROI.
In conclusion, it is desirable that the ROI shall be abolished in near future. Because this system has much more problems than any other systems that were enacted in commercial law and securities exchage law.
Futhermore, this system exists still now only in Korea.
In recent, holding company, outside directors, disclosure, audit committee, consolidated financial statements etc are enacted in commercial law and securities exchange law to improve corporate governance in Korea.
More specially, corporate laws should minimize the compulsory clauses to protect interest groups, allowing more discretion to management and to induce efficient management decisions.
On the other hands, is also needs to provide outside shareholders an opportunity to better understand the problems of corporate governance of companies, to prevent arbitrary decisions of a large shareholders and the lack of transparency.
Restrictions on Equity Investment(ROI) regulates that any corporation belonging to a designated business corporation group shall be prohibited from acquiring or owning stocks of another domistic companies in excess of 40 % of its asset.
The system was enacted prevent dominent share holders(Chae-bul) from pursuing their private interest through the small investment into their subsidiaries, and to improve the corporate governance.
In this study, I consider the history, the policies and the contents of the ROI as well as its problems, substitution countermeasures. Specially, I put emphasis on trying to find out the problems of ROI and the substitution countermeasures for this system.
This paper critically reviws the rationale of ROI provided in Lim(2003), and also the proposal by the Korea Fair Trade Commision(KFTC) to base regulation using th "Indices of Ownership Control Disparity(IOCD). I find that IOCD is problematic if it is used as a criterion for exempting firms from ROI.
In conclusion, it is desirable that the ROI shall be abolished in near future. Because this system has much more problems than any other systems that were enacted in commercial law and securities exchage law.
Futhermore, this system exists still now only in Korea.
In recent, holding company, outside directors, disclosure, audit committee, consolidated financial statements etc are enacted in commercial law and securities exchange law to improve corporate governance in Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 출자총액제한제도
Ⅲ. 출자총액제한제도의 정책목표 평가
Ⅳ. 출자총액제한제도의 문제점 분석
Ⅴ. 출자총액제한제도에 대한 경제헌법적 고찰
Ⅵ. 결론
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
출자총액제한제도의 문제점과 대체방안
기업법연구
2006 .09
-
일본의 회사지배구조에 대한 연구
경영법률
2008 .01
-
한국 기업집단의 지배구조 개선방안 : 소유ㆍ지배구조 개선방안을 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2005 .02
-
사회연결망 분석기법을 활용한 기업지배구조와 기업성과 연구
경영과학
2012 .07
-
Current Corporate Governance Structure in Korea (I)
기업법연구
2005 .06
-
Current Corporate Governance Structure in Korea (3)
기업법연구
2005 .12
-
회사법상 이사회의 감독기능 강화에 관한 비교법적 검토(한국-일본) : 일본의 집행임원제 및 감사등위원회설치회사제도를 중심으로
법과기업연구
2014 .06
-
미국 회사지배구조의 최근의 경향- 사베인즈-옥슬리법을 중심으로 -
외법논집
2005 .01
-
Association between Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance in Iran
유통과학연구
2013 .01
-
한국의 기업지배구조와 기업범죄
비교형사법연구
2013 .01
-
금융회사의 지배구조개선과 신인의무이론의 접목가능성
은행법연구
2018 .01
-
企業支配構造改善의 實態分析
기업법연구
2005 .06
-
The Mediating Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance
산업경제연구
2013 .02
-
기업지배구조 개선을 위한 공시제도 개선방안에 관한 연구- 연성규범과 CoE를 중심으로
은행법연구
2020 .01
-
공기업 지배구조의 특성과 개선 방안에 관한 법적 고찰
기업법연구
2010 .06
-
기업지배구조 연구의 고찰과 향후 국내관련 연구의 방향
경영학연구
2017 .06
-
일본의 중소기업법제
기업법연구
2007 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0