지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Government Procurement Act deals with the process of procuring goods, services and projects for public agency. As budget control is critical, this area was traditionally dealt in public finance law. This is the reason why government procurement was provided in Public Budget and Accounting Law and Local Government Finance Law. However, nowadays government procurement is provided in individual statutes('Act on the contract in which state is party', and 'Act on the contract in which local government is party') separated from Government Budget and Accounting Law and Local Government Finance Law. These enactments were influenced by Korea's joining in WTO Government Procurement Agreement(GPA). Considering the history of these enactments, the Korean government procurement contract needs to be dealt in 'correlation between public finance law and international economic law' context.
Though government procurement contracts related statutes are separated from public financial basic laws, these contracts are still used as tools of public finance administration. Therefore, government procurement contract regime can be evaluated as apart of public finance law system. However, government procurement contract law system is different from traditional public finance law system in that it is equipped with various transparency related provisions including contracting type and review system. Considering these aspects of government procurement contracts, public law nature of these transparency-related provisions should be acknowledged, and these provisions should not be deemed to have just internal effect. This point can be evaluated as a positive correlation between public finance law and international economic law.
On the other hand, WTO GPA has tendency of restricting the scope of individual countries' discretionary powers in public finance administrations. It especially restricts the industrial or technical policy use of government procurement contract. Guaranteeing the industrial or technical policy use of government procurement to a certain extent is meaningful for economic development of Korea and other developing countries. International economic system which is reorganized to enhance economic development of developing countries will contribute to the expansion of Korea's procurement market in the long-term. To this end, Korean government should make just effort to guarantee discretionary powers in public finance administrations in WTO GPA revision process.
Though government procurement contracts related statutes are separated from public financial basic laws, these contracts are still used as tools of public finance administration. Therefore, government procurement contract regime can be evaluated as apart of public finance law system. However, government procurement contract law system is different from traditional public finance law system in that it is equipped with various transparency related provisions including contracting type and review system. Considering these aspects of government procurement contracts, public law nature of these transparency-related provisions should be acknowledged, and these provisions should not be deemed to have just internal effect. This point can be evaluated as a positive correlation between public finance law and international economic law.
On the other hand, WTO GPA has tendency of restricting the scope of individual countries' discretionary powers in public finance administrations. It especially restricts the industrial or technical policy use of government procurement contract. Guaranteeing the industrial or technical policy use of government procurement to a certain extent is meaningful for economic development of Korea and other developing countries. International economic system which is reorganized to enhance economic development of developing countries will contribute to the expansion of Korea's procurement market in the long-term. To this end, Korean government should make just effort to guarantee discretionary powers in public finance administrations in WTO GPA revision process.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 우리나라 정부조달법제의 역사적 전개
Ⅲ. 국제경제법과 재정행정법간의 양(陽)의 상관관계
Ⅳ. 국제경제법과 재정행정법간의 음(陰)의 상관관계
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (43)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권해수 / 2003 / 반부패패러다임으로서의 조달행정 : 65 ~ 85
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김대인 / 2005 / 정부조달계약에 있어서 투명성의 법적 의미 / 행정법연구 13 : 195 ~ 222
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김대인 / 2006 / 정부조달계약의 투명성확보를 위한 법제개선방안
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김상태 / 2004 / 지방재정법제의 문제점과 개선방안 16 : 281 ~ 308
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김성수 / 사법행정1994.4-6. / “국가의 재정잭 책임과 국가의 재정행위에 대한 법적 통제
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김대인 / 2005 / 정부조달계약에 있어서 투명성의 법적 의미 / 행정법연구 13 : 195 ~ 222
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김대인 / 2006 / 정부조달계약의 투명성확보를 위한 법제개선방안
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김상태 / 2004 / 지방재정법제의 문제점과 개선방안 16 : 281 ~ 308
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김성수 / 사법행정1994.4-6. / “국가의 재정잭 책임과 국가의 재정행위에 대한 법적 통제
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
WTO 정부조달제도(GPA)로부터 바라본 중국 정부조달제도의 문제점과 입법과제
경영법률
2013 .01
-
분권화시대의 지방정부 조달시스템 효율화 방안
경기연구원 기본연구
2011 .12
-
미국의 주(州) 및 지방정부 계약법제에 대한 연구
지방자치법연구
2018 .01
-
한·중 FTA 관련 중국 정부조달시장 개방에 관한 중국정부조달법(政府采構法) 연구 및 대응방안 모색
중앙법학
2012 .09
-
AN EXPLORATORY APPROACH ON PUBLIC E-PROCUREMENT IN CHINA BASED ON KOREAN SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION
한국로고스경영학회 학술발표대회논문집
2007 .07
-
AN EXPLORATORY APPROACH ON PUBLIC E-PROCUREMENT SYSTEM IN CHINA BASED ON KOREAN SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION
한국로고스경영학회 학술발표대회논문집
2007 .07
-
국가종합전자조달(GePS) 시스템에 관한 소고 : 조달관련 법령 및 제도 개선사항을 중심으로
강원법학
2002 .11
-
정부조달분야의 국제 거버넌스 협정에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2009 .12
-
한국기업의 해외정부조달분야 수출증대방안에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2010 .06
-
공공조달계약 관련법제의 개혁에 대한 고찰 : 국가계약법을 중심으로
강원법학
2009 .06
-
EU 신공공조달지침하에서의 독일 법제에 대한 비교연구 : 공법적 제도를 중심으로
경제규제와 법
2018 .05
-
젠더법의 관점에서 본 공공조달
이화젠더법학
2011 .09
-
정부조달계약에 있어서 투명성의 법적 의미
행정법연구
2005 .05
-
헌법적 문제로서 한국 정부조달제도의 몇 가지 이슈
저스티스
2019 .02
-
Transparency and Fight against Public Procurement Corruption in Nigeria: A Perspective on the Public Procurement Act, 2007
Asian Journal of African Studies
2020 .02
-
재정건전화를 위한 계약심사제도의 개선방안
일감법학
2014 .01
-
지역발전을 위한 지방계약법제와 민간투자법제의 정비방안
지방자치법연구
2009 .01
-
개정 WTO 정부조달협정과 지방계약법의 발전방안
지방자치법연구
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0