지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper I want to find out the Korean case system of calligraphic materials, 'Byoung-ja-rok'(병자록) and 'Seon-bugun-eun-haeng-yu-sa' (선부군언항유사).
As we know, written language is different from spoken language. So the Korean case system which is written in these materials, is not complete one in that 18008. Especially I think that it is not the same such a spoken language.
In these materials, subjective case markers are 'i(ㅣ), i(이), ga(가)' and 'kyeo-o-syeo (겨오셔)/skui-syeo(꾀셔)'. 'i'(ㅣ/이) is original subject case marker from old times. But 'ga(가)' is developed in 18C. If subject noun is honorific personal pronoun, the subject markers is replaced by 'kyeo-o-syeo (겨오셔)/skui-syeo(꾀셔)', that is 'kke-seo(께서)' nowadays.
There are four kinds of accusative case marker. Those are all 'el/eul(알/을), lel/leul(랄/를)'. But real accusative case marker are 'eul/leul(을/를)'. It's reason is that Korean vowel 'e(ㆍ)' had been changed into 'eu(ㅡ)' or 'a (ㅏ)' in the 17C. We have other accusative case marker 'heul(흘)' . This case marker is added to the h-final noun. But the case marker 'heul' in this materials is not true one. It is only an old type just like Middle Korean.
We were able to confirm two functions from one case marker 'euy(의)'. One is genitive case marker and the other locative marker. We can only distinguished these case marker functions from the context. Accordingly genitive case marker or locative case marker is ‘ui(의)’.
'Eu-ro/ro(으로/로)' is instrumental case marker. However 'ro(로)'is changed into 'no (노) , which is agglutinated by the 'l(ㄹ)' fmal noun. This phenomenon is the phonological representation of Modem Korean.
Finally, dative case markers are 'ui-ge/e-ge(의게/에게)', 'skui(꾀)', 'da-ryeo(다려)' and 'eul/leul(을/를)'. 'ui-ge/e-ge(의게/에게)' are common dative case marker and 'skui(꾀)' is honorific dative case marker. If any dative personal pronoun is topicalized by a speaker, the dative case marker is replaced by 'eul/leul(을/를)'. Generally this topic dative case marker 'eul/leul(을/를)' is called.
As we know, written language is different from spoken language. So the Korean case system which is written in these materials, is not complete one in that 18008. Especially I think that it is not the same such a spoken language.
In these materials, subjective case markers are 'i(ㅣ), i(이), ga(가)' and 'kyeo-o-syeo (겨오셔)/skui-syeo(꾀셔)'. 'i'(ㅣ/이) is original subject case marker from old times. But 'ga(가)' is developed in 18C. If subject noun is honorific personal pronoun, the subject markers is replaced by 'kyeo-o-syeo (겨오셔)/skui-syeo(꾀셔)', that is 'kke-seo(께서)' nowadays.
There are four kinds of accusative case marker. Those are all 'el/eul(알/을), lel/leul(랄/를)'. But real accusative case marker are 'eul/leul(을/를)'. It's reason is that Korean vowel 'e(ㆍ)' had been changed into 'eu(ㅡ)' or 'a (ㅏ)' in the 17C. We have other accusative case marker 'heul(흘)' . This case marker is added to the h-final noun. But the case marker 'heul' in this materials is not true one. It is only an old type just like Middle Korean.
We were able to confirm two functions from one case marker 'euy(의)'. One is genitive case marker and the other locative marker. We can only distinguished these case marker functions from the context. Accordingly genitive case marker or locative case marker is ‘ui(의)’.
'Eu-ro/ro(으로/로)' is instrumental case marker. However 'ro(로)'is changed into 'no (노) , which is agglutinated by the 'l(ㄹ)' fmal noun. This phenomenon is the phonological representation of Modem Korean.
Finally, dative case markers are 'ui-ge/e-ge(의게/에게)', 'skui(꾀)', 'da-ryeo(다려)' and 'eul/leul(을/를)'. 'ui-ge/e-ge(의게/에게)' are common dative case marker and 'skui(꾀)' is honorific dative case marker. If any dative personal pronoun is topicalized by a speaker, the dative case marker is replaced by 'eul/leul(을/를)'. Generally this topic dative case marker 'eul/leul(을/를)' is called.
목차
1. 서론
2. 본론
3. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조사 '을/를'이 나타나는 피동문에 대하여
어학연구
2005 .03
-
‘－어하다’ 결합형의 논항 실현 양상 : ‘을/를’ 명사구의 실현 여부를 중심으로
어문학
2015 .09
-
近代 國語 筆寫本資料에서의 ‘ㄹ－ㄴ’表記에 대한 小考 : 『병자록』과 『션부군 언항유사』를 중심으로 -
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2001 .03
-
An Overview and Characteristic of Jangseogak Owned Yuseoryu
장서각
2016 .04
-
A constraint-based approach to Korean dative cases
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2005 .05
-
軍營謄錄은 어떻게 장서각으로 왔을까?
장서각
2013 .10
-
장서각 소장 복식류 보존처리의 현황과 새로운 방향모색
장서각
2014 .10
-
장서각 소장 『한청문감』의 필사 방식과 국어학적특징 고찰
동양고전연구
2016 .01
-
장서각 소장 왕실 관련 印譜의 내용과 가치
장서각
2017 .04
-
장서각 소장 한글 실기 문학 연구 : 선부군언행유사, 고씨효절록, 병자록을 중심으로
장서각
2001 .08
-
학생부군신위 외 2편
황해문화
2018 .12
-
How the “Gun’yeong Deung’rok (軍營謄錄)” materials entered the Jangseogak Archives?
장서각
2013 .10
-
The Demonstrative Ku 'He' Binding in the Dative Construction
언어학 연구
2010 .04
-
The Evolution of Korean Dative Markers : Its Formal and Cognitive Motivations
어학연구
2009 .12
-
한국인 L2화자의 여격 구문 인식에 관한 연구
새한영어영문학
2015 .08
-
제국의 유산 : 장서각 소장 李王職 자료의 유래와 특징
장서각
2014 .10
-
한글 필사본 「여항소설」의 표기 연구
국어문학
1998 .01
-
러시아어의 여격 명사구는 모두 논항인가? : '소유'를 나타내는 여격 명사구를 중심으로
슬라브학보
2001 .12
-
Syntax and Statistical Learning in the Language Development of the English Dative Alternation
영어영문학연구
2013 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-151-001730808