메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제129호
발행연도
2005.6
수록면
117 - 144 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The intellectuals who lived at the end of the Taehan Empires perception of territory and borders was in many ways an extension of that of the scholars of the late period of Chos?n. More to the point, the growing interest in border issues with Manchuria which occurred during this period was influenced by the arrival of Russian troops in Manchuria following the Boxer Rebellion of 1900. Moreover, the emergence of the issue of unsecured borders as a result of the burgeoning population in this area also factored into this growing interest in the border issue.
Unlike the past, negotiations and debates between Chos?n and China were carried out based on modern international law during the reign of King Kojong. As such, the definition of the boundaries between modern states, or what can be characterized as exclusive territorial states, became one of the overarching border-related issues during this period. Meanwhile, there is clear evidence that the perception of territory possessed by Korean intellectuals in the media during this period was greatly influenced by the notions of social Darwinism and imperialism. As such, as imperialistic expansion was perceived as the natural result of the survival of the fittest, Chos?n intellectuals perception of territory can be said to have been based on the imperialistic worldview, or what is more commonly known as the Law of the Jungle.
The gradual strengthening of the perception that a clash of races was afoot during the Russo-Japanese War of 1904, and the concurrent expansion of the concept of the nation, had the effect of challenging the Chos?n intellectuals traditional practice of deriving their legitimacy from the fact that they were the successors of Tangun and Kija. In this regards, the emergence of the Kuksu poch?nron (國粹保全論, preservation of the national spirit embedded in traditions, customs, and institutions) helped to clearly define the national identity by unifying nationalism with the concept of the Tangun nation. In addition, as the history of a state started to be perceived as that of a particular nations rise and fall, the perception of a nation-state began to take shape as well. The changes in the perception of the concepts of nation and state in turn had an effect on the perception of Kangy?k (强域). As such, the Kot´o ?isik (故土意識, perception of territory which prevailed during the ancient era) rooted in the awareness that the state was the rightful successor to the ancient kingdoms was expanded upon to become a general awareness of a national living space.
The border dispute between the Chos?n and Qing dynasties over the Jiandao (間島) area became the responsibility of Japan following the establishment of the protectorate system. The present boundary was set by the so-called Jiandao Agreement signed by Japan and China in 1909. As such, during this period marked by the formation of nation-states and imperialism, all of the East Asian countries underwent a process marked by both cooperation and conflict through which the notion of the spaces in which the state operated was strengthened.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 러일전쟁 이전 시기 민족의식과 영토관
Ⅲ. 러일전쟁 이후의 민족의식의 추이와 영토관
Ⅳ. 맺음말
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018333349