지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The concept of adoption is not of common law origin, but a 'creature of statutory origin' in the United States. Adoption is, therefore, a court procedure by which an adult becomes the legal parent of someone who is not his or her biological child. Adoption creates a parent-child relationship recognized for all purposes-including child support obligations, inheritance rights and custody. While in most cases adults adopt miners, it is possible in most states for one adult to adopt another.
Regardless of type, adoptions can be granted only by a court and are allowed only when the court declares the adoption to be in the best interests of child. To assist the court in making this determination, the state (or local) welfare department conducts on investigation into the home maintained by the prospective adopting parents. The court looks at: the occupations, earnings and stability of the prospective parents; the medical, emotional and physical needs of the child; religious and racial compatibility; whether the prospective parents has any criminal record or history of child abuse; the age of the child.
In recent years, some people have challenged certain aspects of the adoption process, calling for reform. Many of these people have conflicting concerns. Biological parents have challenged the time limits when their consent for adoption becomes final. They want a longer period of time. For them, adoption should be viewed as a process of last resort. Conversely, adoptive parents wants shorter time limits in order to assure certainty and finality of the adoption process. Adult adoptees, who were adopted as children, assert that adoption files that were closed when they were adopted and remain confidential should be open upon their request. They are in search of their biological identity. States are at various stages in responding to these reform demands. The Uniform Adoption Act, promulgated in 1994 by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and also adopted by the American Bar Association in 1995, attempts to respond to these conflicting concerns. The promoters of the Act also seek to influence the various states to adopt this Act and bring uniformity of adoption law among the states.
Especially I have studied concerning the Best Interests of the Child in the American Adoption Law. As a result, For generations, American law has professed "the best interests of the child" doctrine, a "threshold standard," as the basis for american court decision and legislative intent concerning children.
Regardless of type, adoptions can be granted only by a court and are allowed only when the court declares the adoption to be in the best interests of child. To assist the court in making this determination, the state (or local) welfare department conducts on investigation into the home maintained by the prospective adopting parents. The court looks at: the occupations, earnings and stability of the prospective parents; the medical, emotional and physical needs of the child; religious and racial compatibility; whether the prospective parents has any criminal record or history of child abuse; the age of the child.
In recent years, some people have challenged certain aspects of the adoption process, calling for reform. Many of these people have conflicting concerns. Biological parents have challenged the time limits when their consent for adoption becomes final. They want a longer period of time. For them, adoption should be viewed as a process of last resort. Conversely, adoptive parents wants shorter time limits in order to assure certainty and finality of the adoption process. Adult adoptees, who were adopted as children, assert that adoption files that were closed when they were adopted and remain confidential should be open upon their request. They are in search of their biological identity. States are at various stages in responding to these reform demands. The Uniform Adoption Act, promulgated in 1994 by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and also adopted by the American Bar Association in 1995, attempts to respond to these conflicting concerns. The promoters of the Act also seek to influence the various states to adopt this Act and bring uniformity of adoption law among the states.
Especially I have studied concerning the Best Interests of the Child in the American Adoption Law. As a result, For generations, American law has professed "the best interests of the child" doctrine, a "threshold standard," as the basis for american court decision and legislative intent concerning children.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 입양의 유형
Ⅲ. 입양의 요건 및 절차
Ⅳ. 입양의 법률효과
Ⅴ. 입양의 취소
Ⅵ. 결어
〈참고문헌〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
우리나라 입양제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구
국제법무
2019 .01
-
한국입양법의 문제점
원광법학
2007 .01
-
국내법에 나타난 입양제도의 변천과정 분석: 아동권리의 관점에서
한국가족복지학
2011 .01
-
아동의 권리 강화를 위한 입양특례법 개정방안
한국사회복지학회 학술대회 자료집
2016 .04
-
국제입양에 관한 헤이그 협약에 비추어 본 국제입양 관련법의 개선방안
법과기업연구
2014 .12
-
국내외 입양 관련 법률 체계와 내용에 관한 비교연구 : 한국, 일본, 노르웨이, 스웨덴, 영국을 중심으로
한국아동복지학
2011 .04
-
예비입양부모의 입양 태도 및 동기와 입양사례 경험에 관한 탐색적 연구
한국사회정책
2017 .09
-
입양기관 사회복지사의 입양에 대한 주관적 인식 유형
한국가족복지학
2011 .01
-
헤이그 국제아동입양 협약과 주요국 입양법에 관한 연구
법학논총
2010 .02
-
국내 입양발전을 위한 입양관련 프로그램개발 및 입양법개정 제안
한국아동복지학
1998 .12
-
영국 2002년 입양 및 아동법 (Adoption and Children Act 2002)에 관한 소고
가족법연구
2019 .01
-
가족주의 가치를 공유한 국가들의입양법 국제비교에 관한 연구
한국가족복지학
2016 .01
-
공개입양가족의 입양 관련 의사소통에 관한 탐색적 연구
한국아동복지학
2010 .04
-
개방입양의 법제화를 위한 연구
법학연구
2012 .07
-
입양환경 변화에 따른 입양기관의 역할 재정립에 관한 입양기관 실무자 의견조사
한국아동복지학
2016 .06
-
입양아동의 국제적 보호
국제법학회논총
2003 .08
-
아동복지를 위한 입양법의 제언
강원법학
2012 .02
-
국내 공개입양가정의 입양 의사소통 모형 개발 연구
한국아동복지학
2013 .03
-
1993년 헤이그국제입양협약 : 국제입양에 관한 아동보호 및 협력에 관한 헤이그협약
국제사법연구
2009 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018389873