지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Dan-Goon, the founder of Ancient Cho-Sun dynasty, was the son of Hwan-Woong(桓雄) and Bear-Woman. Hwan-Woong, the son of Celestial God Whan-In(桓因), came down to the earth and was going to marry. However, he couldn't find a partner in the beginning because only a tiger and a bear existed. Both the tiger and the bear wanted to become a woman and prayed to Hwan-Woong. Only the bear could endure the trial and obeyed some Taboo, and then became a woman. Finally, Hwan-Woong and the bear married. and gave birth to Dan-Goon.
According to this myth. they say that Koreans are the descendants of a bear in the maternal side. But the Chinese character '熊', probably pronounced as 'Corn' or 'Gam', was a homonym of 'bear' and 'god'. So they may have written the letter on the basis of the meaning of god. I think the archetype of Dan-Goon myth originated from the supposition that Dan-Goon was the son of God. In this case both Hwan-Woong and the bear were gods. They originally belonged to one god, and they are divided into two parts to get married so that they might follow human marriage. Anyhow, in this context, D an-Goon was a son of a god.
There are many materials that justify the meaning of god by 'Gom'. For example, in the Korean classic Samgukyusa(三國遺事) and the names of places, the letter 'bear(熊)' was often replaced by ‘dragon (龍)’. In this case, the real meaning of the letters referred to god.
The appearance of a bear in Dan-Goon myth can be supported by Gom-Naru(bear ferry) legend. The Gom-Naru was a sacred place of the water-god. However, the double meaning of Gom made the ferry a place of shrine for the bear. Dan-Goon was not only the son of the mountain god, but he himself was also the mountain god. But he gradually became known as the son of a bear.
According to the Korean text Kyerimyusa(鷄林類事) in Koryo dynasty, the tiger also had the meaning of god. Therefore, the tiger could be a spouse of Hwan Woong. Besides, the Korean mountain-god has been a tiger in the past and still is. However. in the late Koryo dynasty when the myth presumed to be written down, the letter that meant 'god' seems to be represented as the as the letter 'bear'.
Finally, my point is that the Dan-Goon myth we now know is a version that emphasized the bear's role among many Dan-Goon myths.
According to this myth. they say that Koreans are the descendants of a bear in the maternal side. But the Chinese character '熊', probably pronounced as 'Corn' or 'Gam', was a homonym of 'bear' and 'god'. So they may have written the letter on the basis of the meaning of god. I think the archetype of Dan-Goon myth originated from the supposition that Dan-Goon was the son of God. In this case both Hwan-Woong and the bear were gods. They originally belonged to one god, and they are divided into two parts to get married so that they might follow human marriage. Anyhow, in this context, D an-Goon was a son of a god.
There are many materials that justify the meaning of god by 'Gom'. For example, in the Korean classic Samgukyusa(三國遺事) and the names of places, the letter 'bear(熊)' was often replaced by ‘dragon (龍)’. In this case, the real meaning of the letters referred to god.
The appearance of a bear in Dan-Goon myth can be supported by Gom-Naru(bear ferry) legend. The Gom-Naru was a sacred place of the water-god. However, the double meaning of Gom made the ferry a place of shrine for the bear. Dan-Goon was not only the son of the mountain god, but he himself was also the mountain god. But he gradually became known as the son of a bear.
According to the Korean text Kyerimyusa(鷄林類事) in Koryo dynasty, the tiger also had the meaning of god. Therefore, the tiger could be a spouse of Hwan Woong. Besides, the Korean mountain-god has been a tiger in the past and still is. However. in the late Koryo dynasty when the myth presumed to be written down, the letter that meant 'god' seems to be represented as the as the letter 'bear'.
Finally, my point is that the Dan-Goon myth we now know is a version that emphasized the bear's role among many Dan-Goon myths.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제 제기
Ⅱ. 단군신화의 곰
Ⅲ. 熊神의 實體
Ⅳ. 곰나루 전설과의 비교
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
신명기 역사에 나타난 ‘하나님의 사람’ 구절 연구 : 왕상 12:33~13:34
신학과 목회
2018 .11
-
Who is God
Catholic Theology and Thought
2016 .06
-
산신설화의 전승양상과 산신숭배의 문화
비교민속학
2005 .06
-
山神信仰硏究 : 文獻說話를 中心으로
한국민족문화
2000 .12
-
Meister Eckhart의 하나님 이해와 하나님 아들의 삶
신학논단
2009 .06
-
‘단군신화’의 한국어 교재 수용 양상 고찰 및 수록 기준 모색 : 원전 수용방식을 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2010 .12
-
고대 중동과 구약 신화의 관점에서 본 단군 신화의 해석
고조선단군학
2006 .06
-
檀君神話의 神개념과 ‘弘益人間’사상*
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2004 .03
-
The Concept of God in the Idea of Hongik ingan
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2009 .09
-
학습자의 하나님 개념 이해: 문헌분석
기독교교육정보
2000 .09
-
공존의 알고리즘 : 문화융복합 시대에 고전문학 연구자가 설 자리
우리문학연구
2018 .04
-
단군설화의 역사 비평적 해석
고조선단군학
2005 .12
-
산신도(山神圖)에 표현된 산신(山神)의 유형
한국민속학
2005 .06
-
韓國 民間信仰에 나타난 虎의 存在와 그 象徵
어문론집
2011 .07
-
인간의 행복에 대한 기독교적인 이해
행복한 부자연구
2016 .12
-
山神圖에 나타난 山神의 모습에 關하여
한국무속학
2002 .06
-
바울을 모델로 한 대학 복음화 방안
대학과 복음
2004 .12
-
진리와 인간의 신학적 이해
인문학논총
2001 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018395492