지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the 17th and 18th centuries, in some local regions Sachang/社倉 granaries were established by the local officials(governors). The nature of these Sachang granaries was very different from that of the granaries that existed in the early eras, of which the objective was mainly to make possible some mutual aid and relief among local people. The new Sachang granaries were rather like civilian storage facilities to fund and supplement the financial status of local regions.
Local officials took interest in these Sachang granaries, and they viewed them as sources from which the public could (draw principal granary supplies and then) collect fiscal interest on their own(autonomously). With the Sachang practice in place, which was based upon an idea of people saving themselves, the people could receive food and grain in case of bad harvests, and they could also be relieved of all the miscellaneous duty calls from the government they had to answer. It was indeed an attractive thought to the local governors, and they told the public that if the total amount of the fund grew sufficiently larger, then the interest rate could drop to the level which was argued in the past by Ju Hi(Juja).
Local governors considered this practice, having the public form a fund of its own and collect interest within themselves, as a reincarnation of the Sachang-je practice that had once been suggested by Juja. And regions that saw the implementation of the Sachang granaries also showed the activities of local governors who attempted to spread the practice to other areas as well. In such cases, the local governors would try to utilize the local units’ own budget to supplement the principal granary. And their attempts became more active and widely spread. They even considered other entities designed to address the issue of (harsh) mobilization to dynastic services as bodies created in the vein of Sachang. For example, in the latter half of the 17th century, the Bomin-cheong(補民廳) office was also considered as an entity designed after the Juja’s Sachang granary.
Local officials took interest in these Sachang granaries, and they viewed them as sources from which the public could (draw principal granary supplies and then) collect fiscal interest on their own(autonomously). With the Sachang practice in place, which was based upon an idea of people saving themselves, the people could receive food and grain in case of bad harvests, and they could also be relieved of all the miscellaneous duty calls from the government they had to answer. It was indeed an attractive thought to the local governors, and they told the public that if the total amount of the fund grew sufficiently larger, then the interest rate could drop to the level which was argued in the past by Ju Hi(Juja).
Local governors considered this practice, having the public form a fund of its own and collect interest within themselves, as a reincarnation of the Sachang-je practice that had once been suggested by Juja. And regions that saw the implementation of the Sachang granaries also showed the activities of local governors who attempted to spread the practice to other areas as well. In such cases, the local governors would try to utilize the local units’ own budget to supplement the principal granary. And their attempts became more active and widely spread. They even considered other entities designed to address the issue of (harsh) mobilization to dynastic services as bodies created in the vein of Sachang. For example, in the latter half of the 17th century, the Bomin-cheong(補民廳) office was also considered as an entity designed after the Juja’s Sachang granary.
목차
머리말
1. 17세기 후반의 사창제 논의
2. 17세기 후반 지방관의 사창 운영
3. 18세기 전반의 순천 사창과 회인 보민청(補民廳)
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
宋代 首都의 倉 -그 位置와 管理行政을 中心으로--
중국사연구
2006 .01
-
1920년대 말~1930년대 전반기 조선총독부의 미곡창고 설립과 그 운영의 변화
역사교육
2014 .06
-
南宋代 都市에 출현한 새로운 穀物倉 -도시 서민층의 생활 안정화 정책과 관련하여-
중국사연구
2020 .01
-
노사학파(蘆沙學派)의 환곡개혁책 : 장성, 고창 지역을 중심으로
역사와실학
2009 .11
-
조선시대 牙山 貢稅串倉의 역사적 변천과 倉城의 구조
지방사와 지방문화
2019 .11
-
15ㆍ16세기 漕倉制의 재정립과 그 이해방향
역사와경계
2015 .03
-
조선전기 守令制의 실태와 심언광의 守令觀
인문과학연구
2014 .03
-
18세기 수령과 관찰사의 행정마찰과 처리방식 - ＂嘉林報草＂를 중심으로 -
古文書硏究
2005 .01
-
17, 18세기 환곡에 대한 제도론적 접근 : 재량적 규제체계의 역할을 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2009 .09
-
조선후기 부세의 운영과 감사의 역할
역사와현실
2011 .09
-
조선후기 수령의 업무 능력과 부세 수취의 자율권 : 조선후기 暗行御史 書啓를 중심으로
역사와 담론
2013 .07
-
이지함(李之菡)의 빈민구제활동과 걸인청(乞人廳)
한국사상과 문화
2018 .01
-
지역에서 대안적 활동들
로컬리티 인문학
2010 .10
-
南宋時代 社倉制의 實施와 그 性格 : 福建地方을 中心으로
역사교육
1996 .12
-
임란기 西坰 柳根의 仕宦과 지방관활동
한국인물사연구
2011 .03
-
淸末(1825∼1911) 安徽省의 豊備義倉 설립과 그 의미
동양사학연구
2019 .09
-
1960년대 박정희 정부의 지역통치체계 재편과 ‘유지집단’의 활동 : 충청북도 괴산군 증평읍 사례를 중심으로
역사와현실
2017 .06
-
일제하 조선인 군수의 사회적 위상과 현실 인식 : 1920~30년대를 중심으로
역사와현실
2007 .03
-
중국 지방정부의 재정위기(Financial Crisis) 유발행위의 분석
동아인문학
2016 .12
-
일제하의 지방통치 시스템과 군 단위 ‘관료-유지 지배체제’ : 윤해동 저, 『지배와 자치』(역사비평사, 2006)에 대한 논평
역사와현실
2007 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018481071