지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In his 1974 stage play, Travesties, Sir Tom Stoppard employs the postmodern aesthetic devices of intertextual, historical and artistic pastiche, not only to examine the interdependence of art and history, but also to highlight the validity of art in a time of political upheaval in 1917. Thus, Oscar Wilde’s masterpiece of social critique and comedy, The Importance of Being Earnest (1895), provides the stylistic and contextual template, while James Joyce’s Ulysses (1922) provides many literary references and allusions. In addition, arguments about the meaning of art are debated by three major revolutionary figures (Joyce, Tristan Tzara, Lenin), whom Stoppard resurrects from literary and political history, and who give their own personal perspectives on the issues being raised.
Historical and artistic events take on an almost random pastiche form, as they are filtered through a metadramatic narrator (Henry Carr) and his erratic memory, in a series of comic, multiple rewritings of Wilde, direct quotations of Joyce and Lenin, and references to Shakespearean sonnets, Dadaist poetry and its mode of performance, along with ‘retellings’ of historical ‘facts’ by Lenin and his wife Nadya. The combined effect is a uniquely ‘Stoppardian Comedy of Ideas’, which satirizes both sides of the ‘meaning of art’ argument, just as The Importance of Being Earnest satirizes Victorian England, through both mimicry and exaggeration, using an innovative style that is entertaining and surprising, while delving into important philosophical and aesthetical ideas. The new synthesis of form and content that emerges in this play neither ridicules nor directly critiques the sources, but instead reflects and builds upon them, producing an effect that is both playful and rich in its comedy and wittily allusive in its irony.
This paper thus examines Stoppard’s originality and eclecticism in the use of postmodern pastiche techniques in Travesties, and explores how the playwright employs them as effective dramatic tools to dramatize his art. In this way, intertextuality and pastiche, along with ‘textual doubling and its linguistic transformation’ add further dimensions to the dramatic toolbox, as Stoppard encourages the reader and the audience to view contemporary society through the lens of postmodern aesthetics.
Historical and artistic events take on an almost random pastiche form, as they are filtered through a metadramatic narrator (Henry Carr) and his erratic memory, in a series of comic, multiple rewritings of Wilde, direct quotations of Joyce and Lenin, and references to Shakespearean sonnets, Dadaist poetry and its mode of performance, along with ‘retellings’ of historical ‘facts’ by Lenin and his wife Nadya. The combined effect is a uniquely ‘Stoppardian Comedy of Ideas’, which satirizes both sides of the ‘meaning of art’ argument, just as The Importance of Being Earnest satirizes Victorian England, through both mimicry and exaggeration, using an innovative style that is entertaining and surprising, while delving into important philosophical and aesthetical ideas. The new synthesis of form and content that emerges in this play neither ridicules nor directly critiques the sources, but instead reflects and builds upon them, producing an effect that is both playful and rich in its comedy and wittily allusive in its irony.
This paper thus examines Stoppard’s originality and eclecticism in the use of postmodern pastiche techniques in Travesties, and explores how the playwright employs them as effective dramatic tools to dramatize his art. In this way, intertextuality and pastiche, along with ‘textual doubling and its linguistic transformation’ add further dimensions to the dramatic toolbox, as Stoppard encourages the reader and the audience to view contemporary society through the lens of postmodern aesthetics.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 문학/예술의 원전/모방의 패스티쉬
Ⅲ. 역사/정치적 사실과 허구적 환상의 패스티쉬
Ⅳ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Against Radical Revolutionaries : The Treatment of Lenin and Tzara in Tom Stoppard's Travesties
현대영미드라마
2004 .04
-
James Joyce Vindicated in Tom Stoppard's Travesties
현대영미드라마
2007 .12
-
Textual and Verbal Playfulness in Stoppard's Travesties : Mise-en-abyme as a Foregrounding Device
현대영미드라마
2011 .04
-
스토파드 초기 극의 역사적 맥락 분석 : 60년대 70년대 영국 연극 동향과 비교하여
현대영미드라마
2012 .12
-
스토파드의 셰익스피어 다시 쓰기/읽기
영어영문학연구
2006 .01
-
톰 스토파드의 메타드라마와 극적 재현의 문제 : The Real Thing의 경우
현대영미드라마
2003 .08
-
Mise-en-abyme in Stoppard's Travesties
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2010 .05
-
희작에 나타난 변형적 교류
영어영문학연구
2006 .01
-
스토파드의 『사랑의 발명』 : 과거 재현과 현대적 재해석
신영어영문학
2009 .08
-
Tom Stoppard의 The Real Thing에 나타난 실제와 허구의 대비
인문학연구
2006 .02
-
톰 스토파드의 동구권 소재 극작품에 나타난 정치성과 연극적 형상화
현대영미드라마
2012 .12
-
Polyphonic Re-telling of Russian Thinkers in Stoppard's Voyage
현대영미드라마
2009 .08
-
Tom Stoppard의 Arcadia에 나타난 대조와 혼돈의 미학
현대영미드라마
1998 .10
-
Tom Stoppard의 Hapgood과 포스트뉴튼적 인식론의 가능성
현대영미드라마
1999 .11
-
상호텍스트성과 스토파드의 연극세계
현대영미드라마
2006 .12
-
『진짜 사랑이란?』: 해체의 미학
신영어영문학
2004 .08
-
톰 스토파드의 ‘사이’ 공간의 무대 미학: 『로젠크란츠와 길던스턴은 죽었다』를 중심으로
영어영문학연구
2007 .01
-
윤리적, 정치적 문제에 대한 스토파드의 작가적 참여 : The Coast of Utopia 삼부작 극을 중심으로
현대영미드라마
2015 .12
-
상호텍스트성과 패스티쉬 비판
비평문학
2007 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-840-018652369