개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The proviso of Paragraph 1 of Article 94 the Labor Standards Act in effect provides that modification the Rules of Employment unfavorably shall require the consent of a majority of the union members if the place of business has a trade union consisting of a majority of its workers, and the consent of a majority of its workers if the place of business does not have a trade union consisting of a majority of its workers, and that unfavorable modifications made to the Rules of Employment in violation of such provision shall be null and void and shall not be binding on the workers.
Even though such methods for modifying the Rules of Employment unfavorably may represent an improvement, if looked at from the perspective of the principle of even decision on the working conditions, such methods harbor a controversial point wherein the interests of the minority of the workers opposed to such modification are not taken into consideration by ascribing the validity of the unfavorable modification to the rule of the consent of the majority.
The purpose of this study is to argue that it is essential to supplement the procedural requirements under the provision of Article 94 of the Labor Standards Act with an examination of the procedures and contents with the foregoing controversial point in mind. Above all, with respect to the examination of the procedures, I, at the suggestion of the relevant arguments in Japan, have indicated that the labor union consisting of a majority of the workers shall have the duty of fair representation and the duty of integration of opinions, and the employer shall have the duty to listen to the opinions and the duty to integrate the opinions.
Next, with respect to the examination of the contents, I, at the suggestion of the relevant arguments in Germany, have presented the justification and feasibility of the examination of the contents, observing that disadvantageous amendment to the Rules of employment under the Labor Standards Act in effect is dependent on the decision of others.
This study is of the trial theory nature arguing that the conflicts of interest between the majority and minority of the workers involved in unfavorable modification to the rules of employment shall be solved by supplementing it with the examination of the procedures and contents other than by meeting the requirements under the proviso of Article 94 of the Labor Standards Act in effect, and is limited in that it has failed to deal with specifically how the procedures and contents shall be examined.
However, given that the rules of employment under the Labor Standards Act stipulate almost all of the working conditions of the workers, is approved by the majority of the workers and thus can hardly secure the propriety of the procedures and contents, the issues presented in this study may be worthy of serious review until the time when the legislative perfection of the legislative system of the rules of employment is attained.
Even though such methods for modifying the Rules of Employment unfavorably may represent an improvement, if looked at from the perspective of the principle of even decision on the working conditions, such methods harbor a controversial point wherein the interests of the minority of the workers opposed to such modification are not taken into consideration by ascribing the validity of the unfavorable modification to the rule of the consent of the majority.
The purpose of this study is to argue that it is essential to supplement the procedural requirements under the provision of Article 94 of the Labor Standards Act with an examination of the procedures and contents with the foregoing controversial point in mind. Above all, with respect to the examination of the procedures, I, at the suggestion of the relevant arguments in Japan, have indicated that the labor union consisting of a majority of the workers shall have the duty of fair representation and the duty of integration of opinions, and the employer shall have the duty to listen to the opinions and the duty to integrate the opinions.
Next, with respect to the examination of the contents, I, at the suggestion of the relevant arguments in Germany, have presented the justification and feasibility of the examination of the contents, observing that disadvantageous amendment to the Rules of employment under the Labor Standards Act in effect is dependent on the decision of others.
This study is of the trial theory nature arguing that the conflicts of interest between the majority and minority of the workers involved in unfavorable modification to the rules of employment shall be solved by supplementing it with the examination of the procedures and contents other than by meeting the requirements under the proviso of Article 94 of the Labor Standards Act in effect, and is limited in that it has failed to deal with specifically how the procedures and contents shall be examined.
However, given that the rules of employment under the Labor Standards Act stipulate almost all of the working conditions of the workers, is approved by the majority of the workers and thus can hardly secure the propriety of the procedures and contents, the issues presented in this study may be worthy of serious review until the time when the legislative perfection of the legislative system of the rules of employment is attained.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제제기와 검토의 방향
Ⅱ. 취업규칙 불이익변경에 있어서의 절차심사의 문제
Ⅲ. 취업규칙 불이익변경에 있어서의 내용심사의 문제
Ⅳ. 결어
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
취업규칙과 근로계약의 관계 - 취업규칙 불이익변경 판례를 중심으로 -
노동법연구
2020 .03
-
취업규칙 불이익변경과 근로계약의 효력 (대상판결: 대법원 2019. 11. 14 선고 2018두200709 판결)
노동법학
2020 .06
-
취업규칙과 근로계약의 효력상 우열관계 — 대법원 2019. 11. 14 선고 2018다200709 판결을 중심으로 —
노동법논총
2020 .04
-
취업규칙의 불이익변경과 집단적 동의
노동법학
2013 .06
-
취업규칙의 불이익 변경과 기존 근로계약 - 대법원 2018다200709 판결의 비판적 검토 -
노동법학
2020 .03
-
취업규칙의 내용통제에 관한 법이론적 검토
한양법학
2012 .05
-
해고와 근로조건변경의 유기적 규율방안
노동법학
2009 .06
-
개정 고용허가제의 문제점과 개선방안 : 2009년 10월 9일 개정법률을 중심으로
노동법논총
2010 .04
-
시용근로관계에 대한 연구
강원법학
2011 .06
-
노동법에서의 절차와 절차위반의 효력 : 4가지 절차규정을 중심으로
노동법연구
2008 .12
-
보험설계사의 노동법상 쟁점과 과제
노동법논총
2019 .12
-
외국인근로자의 사업장변경 실태와 문제점 및 법적개선방안
노동법논총
2011 .12
-
외국인근로자의 헌법상 근로권보장과 고용허가제의 쟁점사항
한양법학
2015 .11
-
일본의 취업규칙에 의한 근로조건의 불이익변경 법리 : 한국과 일본의 비교법적 관점에서
노동법학
2014 .06
-
일본에서의 제정 근로계약법의 내용과 분석
노동법연구
2008 .12
-
골프장캐디의 노동법상의 지위 - 大判 2014. 2. 13, 2011다78804 및 이 판결의 원심 서울고법 2011. 8. 26, 2009나112116에 대한 비판적 검토 -
노동법포럼
2014 .10
-
개별적 근로관계법상 근로자대표제의 법적 고찰
노동법학
2007 .06
-
개정근로시간법제와 취업규칙 불이익변경 : 주 40시간 근로시간제에 관한 개정근로기준법의 시행에 따른 취업규칙 변경에 관한 법적 검토
노동법연구
2006 .06
-
취업규칙의 본질에 관한 일고찰 -우리 근로기준법 제개정사와 관련하여-
외법논집
2013 .01
-
근로조건 대등결정의 원리
노동법학
2015 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-336-018913180