지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper analyzes Korean newspaper articles of human embryo cloning between October 1997 and April 2003 to find out current conditions and problems of nine major newspapers in reporting the subject. For this purpose, the total of 674 articles are categorized into four reporting frames, such as science development, public responsibility, economic development and ethical orientation, and four scales of positivity regarding human embryo cloning, such as affirmation, conditional affirmation, negation, and no particular relation.
The results of analysis show that scientific articles are rare to find and most newspapers heavily depend on university affiliated scientists except the Kukmin Daily which cites the religious most frequently.
In terms of four news frames, public responsibility frame is the most popular, whereas economic development turns out to be the least. Scientists tends to stress science development along with public responsibility. By contrast, the religious and social movement groups hardly support science development frame.
Regarding the positivity of human embryo cloning, government officials, businessmen, medical organizations, and university and research affiliated scientists stand for the positive extreme, and the religious, women's and environment movement groups, and university and research affiliated non-scientists represent the negative extreme, while parliament members are in between.
Most newspapers similarly emphasize public responsibility the most, and then science development, ethical orientation, and economic development in order. However, there are some differences among newspapers according to their cited sources. For example, the Kukmin Daily's dependence on the religious is strongly related with its emphasis on ethical orientation as well as public responsibility, and the Hankyoreh's diverse sources also reflect its relative balance.
Finally, this paper reveals that Korean newspapers depend heavily upon two major scientists of human embryo cloning, which can easily mislead the public by presenting their interests only. Therefore, it is crucial to include diverse opinions and avoid the interested parties in dealing with ethically debatable subject such as human embryo cloning.
The results of analysis show that scientific articles are rare to find and most newspapers heavily depend on university affiliated scientists except the Kukmin Daily which cites the religious most frequently.
In terms of four news frames, public responsibility frame is the most popular, whereas economic development turns out to be the least. Scientists tends to stress science development along with public responsibility. By contrast, the religious and social movement groups hardly support science development frame.
Regarding the positivity of human embryo cloning, government officials, businessmen, medical organizations, and university and research affiliated scientists stand for the positive extreme, and the religious, women's and environment movement groups, and university and research affiliated non-scientists represent the negative extreme, while parliament members are in between.
Most newspapers similarly emphasize public responsibility the most, and then science development, ethical orientation, and economic development in order. However, there are some differences among newspapers according to their cited sources. For example, the Kukmin Daily's dependence on the religious is strongly related with its emphasis on ethical orientation as well as public responsibility, and the Hankyoreh's diverse sources also reflect its relative balance.
Finally, this paper reveals that Korean newspapers depend heavily upon two major scientists of human embryo cloning, which can easily mislead the public by presenting their interests only. Therefore, it is crucial to include diverse opinions and avoid the interested parties in dealing with ethically debatable subject such as human embryo cloning.
목차
1. 서론
2. 배아복제와 언론
3. 분석 내용 및 방법
4. 분석결과
5. 결론
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
불교의 입장에서 본 배아복제의 문제
생명윤리
2004 .06
-
한국의 생명복제 논쟁
생명윤리
2002 .05
-
An analysis of the British and American policies on human cloning : What are the lessons for Korea?
생명윤리
2002 .05
-
우리는 왜 초기 인간생명을 보호해야 하는가?
생명윤리
2005 .12
-
체세포 핵치환술에 의한 인간 배아 복제에 대한 법적 고찰
생명윤리
2000 .05
-
영국의 줄기세포연구에 관한 윤리와 법정책 : 역사적 배경과 현황
생명윤리
2005 .06
-
인간 배아의 인격 지위에 관한 고찰
생명윤리
2002 .12
-
인간개체복제에 관한 윤리적 논쟁들
생명윤리
2000 .05
-
언어네트워크 분석 기법을 활용한 인간배아복제 신문보도 분석
생명윤리
2012 .12
-
크리스퍼 유전자가위에 의한 인간 배아 편집의 과장 : 국내외 신문기사 내용의 과장 등급에 근거하여
생명윤리
2018 .12
-
人間胚芽複製의 問題點과 解決方案 : 生命倫理法의 改善方案을 中心으로
생명윤리
2005 .06
-
한국인의 과학기술자에 대한 인식분석: 세대, 성, 전공계열의 영향을 중심으로
기술혁신연구
2005 .01
-
양서류 복제에서 포유류 복제까지, 그 논쟁들
생명윤리
2000 .05
-
테러방지법 필리버스터에 대한 언론의 보도태도 비교 분석
한국콘텐츠학회논문지
2020 .09
-
노인여가관련 신문보도의 프레임 분석
한국웰니스학회지
2012 .05
-
황우석ㆍ문신용 교수의 치료용 인간배아복제 사례 분석 : 생명과학 연구윤리의 측면에서
생명윤리
2004 .06
-
연구규범과 가치관을 통해 본 한국과학기술자사회의 성격: 공공부문 연구자를중심으로
기술혁신연구
2008 .01
-
네이버 뉴스스탠드의 신문지면에 대한 비교분석-10개 종속형 온라인 신문의 홈페이지를 중심으로-
디지털융복합연구
2018 .01
-
우리나라 언론보도에 나타난 배아복제 연구자들의 수사 분석
생명윤리
2005 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-570-002513464