지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
To communicate successfully a sender (speaker/writer) attempts to deliver a message in the most effective manner so that a receptor (hearer/reader) can understand it. Further, it becomes important for a translator to carry the source text to the target reader in the easiest possible manner so that the latter comprehends it, and to make information "flow". To achieve this goal, he/she needs to analyze the sentences of the source text at the level of information.
The elements of a clause or sentence can be divided into given information and new information, depending on their status. While given information refers to the information that the sender believes the receptor is already aware of or can infer contextually, new information refers to the information that the sender assumes the receptor to be unaware of or that which the receptor cannot infer contextually. Generally, it is more effective to first provide the given information and then the new information. Although this is a very common structure in all languages, it is expressed ill different ways in various languages, which can cause the distortion of information structure and information flow.
In the case of relative clauses, there are frequent translation problems due to syntactic differences between English and Korean. This study provides the following useful strategies to translate relative clauses: First, translators need to be careful about not distorting the information structure of a source text in the target text, and second, they are required to renounce the given-new strategy when it no longer agrees with the time sequence or logical relations.
The elements of a clause or sentence can be divided into given information and new information, depending on their status. While given information refers to the information that the sender believes the receptor is already aware of or can infer contextually, new information refers to the information that the sender assumes the receptor to be unaware of or that which the receptor cannot infer contextually. Generally, it is more effective to first provide the given information and then the new information. Although this is a very common structure in all languages, it is expressed ill different ways in various languages, which can cause the distortion of information structure and information flow.
In the case of relative clauses, there are frequent translation problems due to syntactic differences between English and Korean. This study provides the following useful strategies to translate relative clauses: First, translators need to be careful about not distorting the information structure of a source text in the target text, and second, they are required to renounce the given-new strategy when it no longer agrees with the time sequence or logical relations.
목차
1. 서론
2. 협조 원리와 구-신 계약
3. 영한 관계절의 유형
4. 관계절의 정보상태와 기능
5. 관계절의 영한 번역
5. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Relative Clauses, Adverbial Clauses, and Information Flow in Discourse
어학연구
1994 .12
-
번역에서의 정보구조 변화: 방송뉴스 번역을 중심으로
통역과 번역
2004 .01
-
The Information Status of English If-clauses in Natural Discourse
어학연구
2001 .09
-
영한 번역의 어순 문제: 이유·원인 부사절
이중언어학
2005 .01
-
문화유산 정보 제공의 현황과 정보의 ‘연결’ 방안 모색
인문콘텐츠
2019 .09
-
Relation between Information Structure and Clause Internal Pauses in the Spontaneous Discourse in Korean
음성과학
2005 .12
-
소절의 내적구조 분석 및 교육적 함의
영어영문학
2013 .04
-
A Pragmatic-Functional Account for Information Structures in English
언어학 연구
2015 .10
-
A Corpus-based Analysis of Clause Ordering in English Complex Sentences
영어영문학연구
2011 .01
-
한국어 정보구조와 사용역
언어학
2017 .08
-
한국어 정보구조표지 ‘은/는’의 의미 - 대조 의미를 중심으로
언어학
2019 .12
-
영어 관계절의 영한번역 유형 연구
언어과학
2009 .01
-
L2 Learners’ Sensitivity to Gap Position in English Relative Clauses
언어학
2013 .08
-
재일한인의 정보행태에 관한 연구
한국민족문화
2005 .10
-
영어 미디어에 사용된 영어 관계절 구문에 대한 코퍼스 기반 연구
외국학연구
2017 .01
-
영어 접촉절의 통사적 특성과 구조에 관한 연구
언어과학
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-701-004327783