메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이승환 (日本 早稲田大学)
저널정보
(사)한국사법학회 비교사법 比較私法 通卷 第42號
발행연도
2008.9
수록면
467 - 495 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Through the revision of commercial law in 2001, the concept of warrant was introduced in Japanese legal system. A warrant is a type of call option where a holder of the option can demand the company to sell or issue stocks to the holder. Before the revision in 2001, the Japanese commercial law viewed negatively toward issuing such options because the low price of options, which was usually below the price of stocks, could infringe on shareholders’ profitability. However, Japanese corporate law recognized that the low price of option does not necessarily cause risks to shareholders’ profitability, hence generally permits corporations issuing warrants as a type of option.
Warrants can be used as various means of financing a corporation in such forms as stock options or poison pills. For example, warrants can fund new capital into a corporation by inducing an issuance of new stocks or by issuing warrant-linked bonds. In addition, warrants can also be issued to directors or employees as an incentive in the form of stock option or to any party to make the terms of a contract more favorable for a corporation. Furthermore, warrants can act as a strong defense mechanism against a hostile mergers and acquisitions. The value of warrants was used to be calculated by appraising the future stock prices, but the current system of appraisal for warrants applies various evaluation models that focus on the value of options.
Influenced by Japan’s embracing of warrants, Korea also plans to introduce the practice of issuing warrants, but mostly to be used as poison pill. However such practice of warrants must first be based on a solid evaluation of options, hence requires careful discretion.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 옵션의 발행
Ⅲ. 옵션의 행사 및 유지청구
Ⅳ. 옵션의 평가
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (38)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001505928