개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Our country’s social problem of low birth rate and aging is at a severe level. Currently, the legal system to actively deal with the problem of low birth rate and aging through Korean civil laws is extremely inadequate. In particular, as we become an aged society, the civil laws which is applied when the mental judgement is deteriorated, has many problems.
Under the current civil laws, incompetence and quasi-incompetence system can be used in case of deterioration of mental judgement. In the cases of incompetence and quasi-incompetence system, the system itself is rigid since it can only provide two types by law despite the fact that there are various degrees of mental judgement and protection needs based on each individual. And it is pronounced as incompetence and quasi-incompetence, it will be recorded in the census registration and hence there are hardly anyone who use this system. In addition, there are resistance and social prejudice against the words such as incompetence and quasi-incompetence. Hence, the system is practically not being used and is ending up as a mere scrap paper.
The same situation is applicable to Japan. Hence, in order to actively deal with these problems, Japan enforced the new adult guardianship laws on 1 April, 2000. There has been discussions of introducing the adult guardianship laws but this ended up as just discussions, being excluded from the civil laws that was proposed in the National Assembly on 21 October 2004. And the adult
guardianship laws was later proposed on 28 August 2006. Hence, this paper researches what should be considered in our laws by making comparative study of the Korean and Japanese adult guardianship laws.
Under the current civil laws, incompetence and quasi-incompetence system can be used in case of deterioration of mental judgement. In the cases of incompetence and quasi-incompetence system, the system itself is rigid since it can only provide two types by law despite the fact that there are various degrees of mental judgement and protection needs based on each individual. And it is pronounced as incompetence and quasi-incompetence, it will be recorded in the census registration and hence there are hardly anyone who use this system. In addition, there are resistance and social prejudice against the words such as incompetence and quasi-incompetence. Hence, the system is practically not being used and is ending up as a mere scrap paper.
The same situation is applicable to Japan. Hence, in order to actively deal with these problems, Japan enforced the new adult guardianship laws on 1 April, 2000. There has been discussions of introducing the adult guardianship laws but this ended up as just discussions, being excluded from the civil laws that was proposed in the National Assembly on 21 October 2004. And the adult
guardianship laws was later proposed on 28 August 2006. Hence, this paper researches what should be considered in our laws by making comparative study of the Korean and Japanese adult guardianship laws.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 일본의 성년후견제도의 개관
Ⅲ. 우리나라의 성년후견법안의 개관
Ⅳ. 맺는 말
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (44)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
현행 민법상 후견제도의 문제점과 성년후견제도의 도입에 관한 고찰
중앙법학
2009 .08
-
성년후견제도의 시행과 과제
민사법의 이론과 실무
2011 .01
-
일본의 성년후견제도의 고찰
법학연구
2007 .08
-
한․일간 성년후견제도의 비교
일본근대학연구
2013 .01
-
일본의 “성년후견제도의 이용촉진에 관한 법률”과 “성년후견제도이용촉진기본계획”의 검토
법이론실무연구
2020 .08
-
중국 후견제도의 현황과 입법동향
가족법연구
2017 .01
-
취약계층을 위한 성년후견제도의 개선방향
한양법학
2015 .02
-
현행 성년후견제도와 관련한 몇 가지 민법규정의타당성에 관한 재검토
홍익법학
2014 .01
-
한국 성년후견제도의 현황과 전망, 과제
가족법연구
2018 .01
-
성년후견감독제 강화를 위한 고찰
법과정책
2016 .01
-
성년후견감독법제에 관한 고찰
재산법연구
2008 .01
-
성년후견제도에 따른 현황과 개선과제
법이론실무연구
2016 .04
-
한국 법무부의 성년후견제도에 관한 민법개정안
재산법연구
2010 .01
-
성년후견제도의 현황과 과제
일감법학
2016 .01
-
성년후견과 관련한 개정 민법 및 외국의 법률 등에 관한 연구
홍익법학
2012 .01
-
임의후견제도의 활성화방안
한양법학
2014 .08
-
일본의 성년후견제도의 개선 논의에 대한 동향
비교사법
2006 .12
-
일본의 미성년후견제도를 통한 우리나라에의 시사점
법과정책
2015 .01
-
프랑스법상 성년자보호제도와 자율지원의 원칙
法學論文集
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001530356