지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Jeong Yak-yong’s Chunchu Gojing(春秋考徵) is a personal review of dynastic ritual protocols made from a perspective of an individual. This is a study that is renowned for its employment of Qing-based verification methods and also for its restructuring of the contents of classical text Chunchu (which were listed in chronological order) into a Five-Category structure(五禮) featured in another classical text, Ju’rye. Through this book, Jeong Yak-yong carefully examined the procedures designed for dynastic shrine memorials that had been observed during the ancient Chinese Ha(夏), Eun(殷) and Ju(周) periods. Behind his such efforts was a determination to express his opinions regarding the Joseon shrine operations and the co-called Five Major Honoring(五享大祭). This aspect of Chunchu Gojing, and Jeong’s discussions inserted in the ‘Shi’hyang(時享, regular honoring)’ chapter inside the 「Gil’rye(吉禮, rituals for auspicious occasions)」 section, have been somewhat neglected by previous studies.
Based upon the achievements of previous studies, attempted in this article is the determination of the meaning of the Five Major Honorings(春·夏·秋·冬·臘日) held at the Joseon dynastic shrine, and also linking the results of such determination to an observation of the reality of the Joseon society in the second half of the 18<SUP>th</SUP> century. Jeong Yak-yong was quite interested in the former, and the latter was what Jeong was forced to live in. So, the connection between the former and the latter, as well as Jeong Yak-yong’s view and his role, are primarily what this article set out to examine. Jeong determined, through analyzing references found in ancient texts, that seasonal merits of items prepared for services are most visible in Jung’weol(仲月) so it would be best to hold seasonal honoring inside the shrine at that time. In the latter half of the Joseon period, all kinds of services and memorials were being observed, so fixing dates for them (so that they would not overlap with each other) and securing sufficient theoretical bases from past manuals for such fixation, was very important to say the least. He also suggested that the presentation practice(臘享), which was turning into a somewhat controversial matter because of the problems that were being generated by the practice of presenting meat(臘肉), be ‘discontinued,’ and the Five Major Honoring be replaced by a new “Four” Major Honoring system(四享大祭). We can see his suggestions were never purely theoretical. He was making such suggestions based upon what he saw and heard, and also upon what he learned from present situations as well as past experiences.
Based upon the achievements of previous studies, attempted in this article is the determination of the meaning of the Five Major Honorings(春·夏·秋·冬·臘日) held at the Joseon dynastic shrine, and also linking the results of such determination to an observation of the reality of the Joseon society in the second half of the 18<SUP>th</SUP> century. Jeong Yak-yong was quite interested in the former, and the latter was what Jeong was forced to live in. So, the connection between the former and the latter, as well as Jeong Yak-yong’s view and his role, are primarily what this article set out to examine. Jeong determined, through analyzing references found in ancient texts, that seasonal merits of items prepared for services are most visible in Jung’weol(仲月) so it would be best to hold seasonal honoring inside the shrine at that time. In the latter half of the Joseon period, all kinds of services and memorials were being observed, so fixing dates for them (so that they would not overlap with each other) and securing sufficient theoretical bases from past manuals for such fixation, was very important to say the least. He also suggested that the presentation practice(臘享), which was turning into a somewhat controversial matter because of the problems that were being generated by the practice of presenting meat(臘肉), be ‘discontinued,’ and the Five Major Honoring be replaced by a new “Four” Major Honoring system(四享大祭). We can see his suggestions were never purely theoretical. He was making such suggestions based upon what he saw and heard, and also upon what he learned from present situations as well as past experiences.
목차
머리말
1. 『춘추고징(春秋考徵)』의 저술 배경과 목적
2. 삼대(三代)의 종묘 사시 · 납향 복원
3. 『춘추고징(春秋考徵)』종묘 사시 · 납향 고증의 의미
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
생(生)의 빛과 향으로
월간에세이
2020 .10
-
정약용의 역사의식과 개혁사상
韓國史學史學報
2019 .01
-
명예와 수치의 관점으로 본 예언자의 갈등: 열왕기상 13장을 중심으로
구약논단
2024 .06
-
주제군징(主制羣徵)과 다산 정약용의 인간관(人間觀)
유학연구
2023 .02
-
殷周代 上帝 관념과 周代 禘 의례의관련성 및 그 변화 양상 - 先秦時期 宗廟 儀禮에 대한 궁구 과정에서
대동문화연구
2016 .01
-
茶山 丁若鏞 解配 이후 교유관계에 대한 고찰(1) -前期(1818~1827)에 限하여-
동방한문학
2021 .09
-
『흠흠신서』 연구의 현황과 관련 필사본의 유형
다산과 현대
2019 .12
-
나주정씨 가문의 대원군 집권기(1863~1873) 살아내기
민족문화
2025 .03
-
정약용 질병시의 의학인류학적 고찰 -질병과 치료 묘사를 중심으로-
열상고전연구
2023 .02
-
다산의 양명학론
다산과 현대
2015 .12
-
종묘와 『종묘의궤속록』
장서각
2017 .04
-
Jongmyo Shrine 宗廟
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2021 .12
-
레귀돈과 정약용의 정치사상 비교
다산학
2017 .01
-
다산 정약용의 忠恕論에 관한 재해석 - 수양론과의 정합성 탐구 -
철학논집
2017 .01
-
丁若鏞의 시와 생활에 투영된 蘇軾
중국어문학
2017 .01
-
錦舲 朴永輔의 글쓰기에 끼친 茶山의 영향
대동한문학(大東漢文學)
2020 .01
-
朱熹와 王守仁과 丁若鏞의 『大學』 해석 비교
한국민족문화
2019 .11
-
근 · 현대 한국의 실학연구와 다산 : 연세 학통에서의 논의를 중심으로
다산과 현대
2015 .12
-
새자료 정학유의 흑산도 기행문「부해기(浮海記)」와 기행시
한국한문학연구
2020 .01
-
日本近代におけるラーメンの受容過程 -中国料理を中心に-
일본문화학보
2023 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-001981732