지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The objective of this study is to analyze Korea’s current foothold in the field of interpreting studies research and present the future path through the use of comparison between the patterns in interpreting studies research in Korea and overseas. To this end, this study sets forth classification of research in interpreting studies, comparing and analyzing papers published in academic journals both at home and abroad. The time range of the corpus of analysis is from 1997 to 2015. The corpus for analysis is 600 studies including: 274 studies on interpretation published in three overseas academic journals, namely Interpreting, Meta and Translation and Interpreting studies; 298 studies on interpretation published in three local academic journals, namely Conference Interpretation and Translation, Interpreting and Translation Studies and The Journal of Translation Studies; and 28 studies on sign language interpretation registered on the Korea Education and Research Information Service (KERIS). Utilizing the classification of research, trend in research is quantitatively analyzed according to year, language, type and genre of interpretation, and scope and theme of research. The results are as follows: 1) Journals that are leading interpreting studies research are Conference Interpretation and Translation and Interpreting and Translation Studies in Korea and Interpreting overseas. Time analysis shows that interpretation related papers are consistently published in the leading journals, whereas great discrepancies exist in the number of interpretation related papers published in the non-leading journals depending on the publishing year; 2) Papers on sign language interpretation account for 9.85% in overseas journals, whereas the number stands at a mere 0.67% in Korea. This showcases the disconnection between research on sign language interpretation and oral language interpretation; 3) In researches that do not distinguish between simultaneous and consecutive modes of interpretation, conference interpretation and community interpretation account for similar proportions in researches abroad, whereas conference interpretation takes up a predominant share in Korea; 4) The analysis on the scope and sub-themes of studies on oral language interpretation shows that the most researched area overseas is descriptive interpreting studies, followed by application, general theory and partial theory, in this set order. In Korea, the most focused is application, followed by general technology, general theory and partial theory, in this order. The order for sign language interpretation research is consistent both at home and abroad, the most researched being general technology, followed by application, general theory and partial theory, in this order. However, the sub-themes of different scopes of studies varies both in the case of oral and sign language.
The implications of the results of analysis and the future path that the Korean academia of interpretation should take are as follows. First, in function-oriented DIS, more attention should be given to the relationship among interpretation participants and the atmosphere of acceptance of interpretation. Second, efforts should be made to close the gap between diverging directions of research on oral and sign language interpretation. Third, effort should be made to fill the void that exist in the scope of research. Fourth, all boundaries in interpreting studies research including language format, interpretation mode and genre of interpretation should be dismantled.
The implications of the results of analysis and the future path that the Korean academia of interpretation should take are as follows. First, in function-oriented DIS, more attention should be given to the relationship among interpretation participants and the atmosphere of acceptance of interpretation. Second, efforts should be made to close the gap between diverging directions of research on oral and sign language interpretation. Third, effort should be made to fill the void that exist in the scope of research. Fourth, all boundaries in interpreting studies research including language format, interpretation mode and genre of interpretation should be dismantled.
목차
1. 서론
2. 통역학 연구의 분류 틀 및 분류 작업
3. 분석결과
4. 논의 및 제언
5. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘기술적 전환’을 반영하는 한 · 중 통역 연구 비교 분석
번역학연구
2021 .09
-
중국 2005년~2017년 통역학 연구 동향 고찰
T&I REVIEW
2019 .01
-
Regular Interpretation Exercises and College Students' Receptive L2 Competence
외국학연구
2016 .01
-
국내 통번역교육 교육내용의 현황과 의미
번역학연구
2019 .10
-
중국의 인공지능(AI) 통역 발전 현황 분석
번역학연구
2019 .12
-
외국인을 위한 통·번역 목적 한국어교육을 위한 교육과정 평가 - 중·일 학습자의 자가 평가를 중심으로 -
언어와 문화
2016 .01
-
수어와 구어 통역 교육 발전 양상 비교 연구
번역학연구
2015 .09
-
외국인을 위한 통번역 목적 한국어 교육 연구 -중국어 화자의 한국어 통번역 교육현황과 교육내용을 중심으로-
외국어로서의 한국어교육
2015 .01
-
순차통역품질평가: 한중순차통역을 중심으로
통번역학연구
2016 .01
-
정보기술을 활용한 중국 통역 교육 연구 현황
T&I REVIEW
2024 .06
-
코퍼스기반 통역 연구에서의 보편소 현상
통번역학연구
2020 .01
-
회의통역은 어떻게 통역학의 화두가 되었나
T&I REVIEW
2023 .06
-
루터와 칼뱅의 성서해석과 그 함의(含意) : 시편 51편 해석을 중심으로
장신논단
2018 .06
-
한-영 실시간 자동통역 시연 사례 고찰
통번역교육연구
2020 .01
-
통번역산업의 시장구조와 특징에 관한 연구
통역과 번역
2015 .01
-
학부 한중통역 교재 분석
통번역교육연구
2020 .01
-
의료 통역의 특수성: 러시아어 통역을 중심으로
러시아어문학연구논집
2017 .01
-
방법으로서의 해석 - 설명과의 비교를 중심으로
용봉인문논총
2016 .01
-
예비통역사를 위한 한국어 수업 사례와 제언
수사학
2017 .04
-
한국교회 설교통역의 특징에 대한 연구 : 커뮤니티통역 및 국제회의통역과의 비교를 중심으로
번역학연구
2015 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-800-000842290