지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The adult guardianship system has been implemented since July 1, 2013, and there are relative guardians, and guardians with specialized jobs among guardians. At the initial stage of the system, many relative guardians were appointed. However, some cases of abusing assets of a ward by relative guardians occurred at the process of trial or supervision phase of adult guardianship related events. As a result, the appointment of relative guardians is decreasing and the appointment of guardians with specialized jobs are increasing. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare countermeasures to prevent any side effects by abuse of adult guardianship system.
Even in Japan, where adult guardianship system began to be implemented before Korea started to implement the system, as adult guardianship related events increased, cases of abusing assets of a ward by relative guardians during the process of executing assets of a ward by relative guardians. Therefore, the appointment of relative guardians decreased and the appointment of guardians with specialized jobs increased. Since guardianship supervision of family court has limitation as it relies on supervision technique mainly with ex post facto supervision, it heralded the need for guardianship supervision method by supervision in advance in order to prevent any deliberate misbehavior by relative guardian and protect assets of a ward.
Now it has introduced and implemented “Guardianship Support Trust” system since Feb. 2012. As a result, assets of a ward can be protected in a broader sense by utilizing Guardianship Support Trust even when appointing a relative as his or her guardian along with the way of appointing guardian with specialized job. It seems inevitable to use Guardianship Support Trust in order for a stable operation of guardianship system in the future.
Therefore, we shall prevent any side effect of abuse by relative guardians and protect assets of a ward by introducing and implementing “the Guardianship Support Trust” system of Japan. If it is determined to introduce the system, we shall take every efforts to implement the system in consideration of problems in practical operations and countermeasures based on the basic ideology of the adult guardianship system.
Even in Japan, where adult guardianship system began to be implemented before Korea started to implement the system, as adult guardianship related events increased, cases of abusing assets of a ward by relative guardians during the process of executing assets of a ward by relative guardians. Therefore, the appointment of relative guardians decreased and the appointment of guardians with specialized jobs increased. Since guardianship supervision of family court has limitation as it relies on supervision technique mainly with ex post facto supervision, it heralded the need for guardianship supervision method by supervision in advance in order to prevent any deliberate misbehavior by relative guardian and protect assets of a ward.
Now it has introduced and implemented “Guardianship Support Trust” system since Feb. 2012. As a result, assets of a ward can be protected in a broader sense by utilizing Guardianship Support Trust even when appointing a relative as his or her guardian along with the way of appointing guardian with specialized job. It seems inevitable to use Guardianship Support Trust in order for a stable operation of guardianship system in the future.
Therefore, we shall prevent any side effect of abuse by relative guardians and protect assets of a ward by introducing and implementing “the Guardianship Support Trust” system of Japan. If it is determined to introduce the system, we shall take every efforts to implement the system in consideration of problems in practical operations and countermeasures based on the basic ideology of the adult guardianship system.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 성년후견제도의 현황
Ⅲ. 일본의 후견제도지원신탁
Ⅳ. 후견제도지원신탁의 시사점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (43)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일본의 미성년후견제도를 통한 우리나라에의 시사점
법과정책
2015 .01
-
中国监护信托制度的构建
중국법연구
2017 .01
-
사회복지사의 성년후견제도 인식을 통해 본 전문후견사회복지사의 역할과 과제
사례관리연구
2021 .12
-
중국 후견제도의 현황과 입법동향
가족법연구
2017 .01
-
발달장애인 성년후견제도에 관한 탐색적 연구
발달장애연구
2016 .01
-
후견법인의 역할과 기능에 관한 입법적 제안: 후견제도 운영 주체로 설정할 필요성을 중심으로
가족법연구
2016 .03
-
성년후견제도에서 신탁제도를 활용한 피후견인의 재산관리방안
한양법학
2019 .08
-
취약계층을 위한 성년후견제도의 개선방향
한양법학
2015 .02
-
일본의 “성년후견제도의 이용촉진에 관한 법률”과 “성년후견제도이용촉진기본계획”의 검토
법이론실무연구
2020 .08
-
친족성년후견인의 역할에 관한 비교법적 연구 - 근친의 법정대리권을 중심으로 -
비교사법
2024 .05
-
성년후견제도 관련 실무사례 분석 및 제도개선방안에 대한 소고- 전문가 후견인(법인) 사례를 중심으로 -
법조
2017 .01
-
공공후견인의 직무 분석과 그 시사점
비교사법
2016 .05
-
중국 후견신탁제도의 구축
중국법연구
2017 .01
-
한국 발달장애인 성년후견인의 경험에 관한 연구 : 공공후견활동을 중심으로
한국사회복지학
2018 .11
-
공공후견과 후견법인의 역할
법학논총
2020 .05
-
법정후견제도에서 후견인의 재산부정사용 문제와 후견제도지원신탁
법학논총
2017 .06
-
일본 “성년후견제도 이용촉진기본계획에 관한 중간검증보고서”에 따른 법무성의 향후 대응
법이론실무연구
2021 .02
-
성년후견제도에 따른 현황과 개선과제
법이론실무연구
2016 .04
-
미성년후견제도의 개정 방향에 관한 연구 - 외국 미성년후견제도와의 비교를 중심으로 -
법학연구
2020 .09
-
성년후견제도의 현황과 과제
일감법학
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-360-001293154