지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.6
- 수록면
- 261 - 284 (24page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis aims at grasping how ‘the political’ emerges in three modern adaptations of Shakespeare’s plays and what the roles of ‘the political’ in each adaptations are. The pursuit of this article is to explore how these Ophelia, GoraeHamlet, and Hamlet’s Father are different from Shakespeare’s works and how these differences manifest ‘the political’.
‘The political’ is, in short, redefining and reassigning the position and the role of the characters and the plot. Such redefinition reveals subtextual meanings, ones that are unheard and unseen in the original plays. Ultimately, ‘the political’ unravels the voices of the unheard and the unseen in order to reveal the questions they raise. The voices of many of these minor characters are left unheard in Shakespeare’s originals. Modern directors reveal ‘the political’ in order to share with the world the themes that these characters present. Furthermore, ‘the political’ induces questions from the audience for the changed and improved society, in this way, these three modern adaptations become the sites of disagreements among audience members because the nature of ‘the political’ is non-consensus.
Ophelia directed by Jeon Yonghwan and GoraeHamlet directed by Lee Haesung are the works that are representatives of catching the voices of the unheard and the unseen. Jeon’s Ophelia differs quite a bit from Shakespeare’s Ophelia in that she is not obedient, not dependent. This new Ophelia is one who raises an existential question about herself, and is dangerous, and power-oriented. Furthermore, she wants to know the inward reflections of Hamlet, and she is anxious to ask what the problems and conflicts of Hamlet are. Lee’s Gertrude is power-oriented in that she hides the fact that the real father of Hamlet is Claudius and later confesses it to Claudius to save Hamlet’s life. The reason she marries Claudius is that she seeks to defend and protect Hamlet from his enemies. This Ophelia and this Gertrude function as new voices which are not represented in Shakespeare’s work. Therefore, they are representatives of the newly heard and the audience can witness the voices of the neglected.
Hamlet’s Father by Lee Sungreol induces the audience to ‘ponder’ the duty and role of responsible beings in a modern Korean society. The performance just presents several situations, encouraging the audience to rethink what should be done rather than claiming any stance itself. Therefore, many situations in the performance become the sites of contention to think over so that the audience is persuaded to answer himself the questions raised in the performance. ‘The political’ means to extract questions from the audience to force them to rethink over the situations in their lives and in the world around them. In this manner, these three performances become excellent examples of what ‘the political’ is.
‘The political’ is, in short, redefining and reassigning the position and the role of the characters and the plot. Such redefinition reveals subtextual meanings, ones that are unheard and unseen in the original plays. Ultimately, ‘the political’ unravels the voices of the unheard and the unseen in order to reveal the questions they raise. The voices of many of these minor characters are left unheard in Shakespeare’s originals. Modern directors reveal ‘the political’ in order to share with the world the themes that these characters present. Furthermore, ‘the political’ induces questions from the audience for the changed and improved society, in this way, these three modern adaptations become the sites of disagreements among audience members because the nature of ‘the political’ is non-consensus.
Ophelia directed by Jeon Yonghwan and GoraeHamlet directed by Lee Haesung are the works that are representatives of catching the voices of the unheard and the unseen. Jeon’s Ophelia differs quite a bit from Shakespeare’s Ophelia in that she is not obedient, not dependent. This new Ophelia is one who raises an existential question about herself, and is dangerous, and power-oriented. Furthermore, she wants to know the inward reflections of Hamlet, and she is anxious to ask what the problems and conflicts of Hamlet are. Lee’s Gertrude is power-oriented in that she hides the fact that the real father of Hamlet is Claudius and later confesses it to Claudius to save Hamlet’s life. The reason she marries Claudius is that she seeks to defend and protect Hamlet from his enemies. This Ophelia and this Gertrude function as new voices which are not represented in Shakespeare’s work. Therefore, they are representatives of the newly heard and the audience can witness the voices of the neglected.
Hamlet’s Father by Lee Sungreol induces the audience to ‘ponder’ the duty and role of responsible beings in a modern Korean society. The performance just presents several situations, encouraging the audience to rethink what should be done rather than claiming any stance itself. Therefore, many situations in the performance become the sites of contention to think over so that the audience is persuaded to answer himself the questions raised in the performance. ‘The political’ means to extract questions from the audience to force them to rethink over the situations in their lives and in the world around them. In this manner, these three performances become excellent examples of what ‘the political’ is.
목차
I. 서론
II. 보이지 않았던 것을 보이게 하기: <오필리아>와 <고래햄릿>
III. 논쟁의 현장: <햄릿 아비>
IV. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『햄릿』에서 죽음을 통한 오필리아의 역할
새한영어영문학
2022 .11
-
햄릿에서 셰익스피어의 관객 통제
고전 르네상스 영문학
2015 .01
-
『햄릿』에서 <햄릿>으로 : 디지털 콘텐츠로 읽는 햄릿의 재해석 작업 비교 연구
동서비교문학저널
2016 .03
-
Ophelia's Confrontation and Self-reflection on Gender Restriction in Hamlet: Lisa Klein's novel Ophelia
인문학연구
2024 .02
-
『햄릿』의 각색과 영화적 변용
국제언어문학
2017 .04
-
Hamlet's (Un)manly Grief: the Cult of the Past in the Age of Theatrical Power
영미문화
2017 .01
-
The Birth of Political Shakespeare: Ki Kukseo’s Hamlet Productions in the 1980s
영어영문학21
2017 .01
-
셰익스피어, 오늘을 이야기하다: 할리우드에서 부활한 『햄릿』
현대영어영문학
2018 .01
-
햄릿과 그의 세계 : 하이데거의 『존재와 시간』을 통한 실존론적 존재론 고찰
Shakespeare Review
2015 .03
-
셰익스피어의 『햄릿』과 테니슨의 『모드』의 비교연구: 생각의 문제
영어영문학
2016 .02
-
호두 껍데기, 자궁, 그리고 햄릿의 감옥?<햄릿>과 매큐언의 <호두 껍데기>
영어영문학21
2021 .12
-
What is Ophelia?―생태비평으로서의 오필리아
비평과이론
2022 .02
-
An Existentialist Revision of Shakespeare’s Skepticism in Hamlet, the Walking Man
Shakespeare Review
2024 .06
-
양정웅과 스티븐 그린블랏: 애도극으로 『햄릿』 읽기
고전 르네상스 영문학
2016 .12
-
제피렐리의 <햄릿>에 나타난 셰익스피어의 미국화 문제
영어영문학연구
2023 .03
-
The Comparison of Villains in Shakespeare's Richard Ⅲ and Hamlet
영어권문화연구
2016 .01
-
이윤택 <햄릿>과 <문제적 인간 연산>의 셰익스피어 각색의 상이성과 현대성
Shakespeare Review
2016 .03
-
이현우의 〈햄릿 Q1〉에 나타나는 위기의 한국 역사: 역사의 반복성 그리고 대조와 상징의 드라마투르기
Shakespeare Review
2025 .02
-
『햄릿』영화들과 정동
새한영어영문학
2016 .02
-
코울리지의 햄릿 이미지
Shakespeare Review
2015 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
The Spatial Existence in Next to Normal : The Presence of an Absent Child on the Stag
Lee
,
Seung-A
현대영미드라마
2014
.04
셰익스피어의 정치적 이용 : 1970년대 영국의 정치 극작가들의 경우
김유
Shakespeare Review
2002
.03
『코리올레이너스』: 셰익스피어의 비극에 나타난 정치성
강희정
Shakespeare Review
2008
.12
『햄릿』의 정치적 무의식과 텍스트 편집 - 4막 5장 106행의 아포리아
송창섭
Shakespeare Review
2008
.09
영화 〈셰익스피어 인 러브 Shakespeare in Love〉의 스토리텔링과 포스트모던적 특성
오세정
,
김기국
인문콘텐츠
2011
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-840-001005480