지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.3
- 수록면
- 31 - 41 (11page)
- DOI
- 10.17262/KJPH.2017.03.54.1.31
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objectives: Despite the existence of a national health insurance system, out-of-pocket (OOP) payments have been playing an important role in the financing of health care in Korea. Using the data from a nationally representative household expenditure survey, this study aims to examine the trend in the catastrophic and impoverishing impact of OOP payments in Korea over the decade from 1996 to 2005. It also investigates the catastrophic impact by income quintiles and by type of service.
Methods: The catastrophic payment headcount is measured as the percentage of households spending OOP payments in excess of 10% of total household expenditures. The poverty headcount is measured by comparing the proportion of individuals who fall below the poverty line before and after OOP payments are deducted from household resources. The national poverty line is used as a poverty threshold.
Results: The percentage of households with OOP payments in excess of the 10% threshold was 11.8% in 1996, went down to 10.2% in 2001, and increased again to 11.8% in 2005. The catastrophic impact has been greatest and has increased among the poorest 20% of households since 2001. The poor are more likely to incur catastrophic payments on drug and outpatient care while the better-off are more likely to spend in excess of the thresholds on inpatient and dental care. The impoverishing effect of OOP payments, though moderate, has been enlarged gradually in recent years.
Conclusion: It is necessary not only to reduce overall OOP payments by extending insurance coverage particularly for inpatient care, but also to ease the vulnerable households’ financial burden by exempting them from some OOP payments.
Methods: The catastrophic payment headcount is measured as the percentage of households spending OOP payments in excess of 10% of total household expenditures. The poverty headcount is measured by comparing the proportion of individuals who fall below the poverty line before and after OOP payments are deducted from household resources. The national poverty line is used as a poverty threshold.
Results: The percentage of households with OOP payments in excess of the 10% threshold was 11.8% in 1996, went down to 10.2% in 2001, and increased again to 11.8% in 2005. The catastrophic impact has been greatest and has increased among the poorest 20% of households since 2001. The poor are more likely to incur catastrophic payments on drug and outpatient care while the better-off are more likely to spend in excess of the thresholds on inpatient and dental care. The impoverishing effect of OOP payments, though moderate, has been enlarged gradually in recent years.
Conclusion: It is necessary not only to reduce overall OOP payments by extending insurance coverage particularly for inpatient care, but also to ease the vulnerable households’ financial burden by exempting them from some OOP payments.
목차
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Distribution and Determinants of Out-of-pocket Healthcare Expenditures in Bangladesh
예방의학회지
2017 .01
-
구강검진에 따른 치과의료비 지출 관련성
대한구강보건학회지
2022 .03
-
Effects of the Out-of-pocket Payment Exemption in the Public Health Center on Medical Utilization of the Korean Elderly
예방의학회지
2020 .01
-
Measuring Out-of-pocket Payment, Catastrophic Health Expenditure and the Related Socioeconomic Inequality in Peru: A Comparison Between 2008 and 2017
예방의학회지
2020 .01
-
Has the Copayment Ceiling Improved Financial Protection in the Korean National Health Insurance System? Evidence From the 2009 Policy Change
예방의학회지
2017 .01
-
Impact of Osteoarthritis on Household Catastrophic Health Expenditures in Korea
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2018 .01
-
Catastrophic Health Expenditures for Households with Disabled Members: Evidence from the Korean Health Panel
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2016 .01
-
Prevalence and Determinants of Catastrophic Healthcare Expenditures in Iran From 2013 to 2019
예방의학회지
2024 .01
-
아프리카 국가 간 보편적 의료보장(UHC) 지표 비교
보건의료산업학회지
2018 .01
-
일차의료에서 혼합수가 중심의 지불제도의 변화: 해외사례와 시사점
Korean Journal of Family Practice
2023 .03
-
The Potential for Poverty to Lower the Self-Efficacy of Adults With Asthma: An Australian Longitudinal Study
Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research
2016 .01
-
Dilemmas Within the Korean Health Insurance System
예방의학회지
2020 .01
-
An analysis of the effects of the income level of the family caregivers for the recipients in long-term care facilities on the willingness to pay for use of better services: A cross-sectional study
노인간호학회지
2023 .05
-
국민건강보험 요양급여 사후관리 체계 현황과 개선방향
보건의료기술평가
2017 .06
-
주거빈곤 청년 1인 가구가 인식하는 건강한 생활과 동네의 의미
보건교육건강증진학회지
2022 .12
-
Assessment of the gender gap in urology industry payments: An Open Payments Program data analysis
Investigative and Clinical Urology
2024 .07
-
Does Economic Instability Affect Healthcare Provision? Evidence Based on the Urban Family Physician Program in Iran
Korean Journal of Family Medicine
2017 .01
-
미국 대체지불제도(Alternative Payment Model)의 현황과 시사점
대한의사협회 의료정책연구소 연구보고서
2020 .01
-
세대별 가구 유형이 건강생활습관, 의료 서비스 이용 및 건강결과에 미치는 효과
보건교육건강증진학회지
2021 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
미국 보건의료개혁의 정책 연혁 및 공공성 분석
여영현
,
이건형
,
박정원
외 1명
한국공공관리학보
2018
.06
중소병원 입장에서 바라본 정부의 보건의료정책에 대한 평가
박진규
의료정책포럼
2018
.06
개원가 입장에서 바라본 정부의 보건의료정책에 대한 평가
최주현
의료정책포럼
2018
.06
비급여의료에 관한 환자유인행위의 판단기준에 관한 고찰
백경희
법학논총
2018
.01
[보도자료] 「건강보험 보장성 강화 대책」에 관한 참여연대 입장 : 비급여 관리를 통한 보장성 강화 정책 방향은 긍정적으로 평가할 만하나_국민 의료비 부담을 경감시키기에 부족한 수준_신포괄수가제와 혼합진료금지로 비급여 해소 대책과 상병수당과 같은 적극적인 보장성 확대방안 필요
편집부
월간 복지동향
2017
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-517-001245626