메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최정민 (건국대학교) 김유나 박동찬 (건국대학교)
저널정보
한국주거환경학회 주거환경 住居環境 통권 제16권 제1호 (통권 제39호)
발행연도
2018.3
수록면
83 - 104 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to explore the concept and desirable direction for Korean community gardens through case studies in Japan, textual semantic network analysis, field investigations, and expert questionnaire survey. Most of the conceptual definitions on community gardens in previous papers are based on the North American definition, resulting in the general perception that community gardens are part of urban agriculture. However, from the terminology alone, community gardens are clearly different from urban agriculture. According to our semantic network analysis, the key words for urban agriculture are cultivation of farm produce and economic effects, whereas the key words for community gardens are residents, exchanges, and community formation. These key words are quite different from each other, suggesting that a clear definition of the two concepts should be made. This paper attempts to define the concept of Korean community garden and classification of the Korean community garden types from two perspectives-from a broad perspective and from a narrow perspective. The concept of the community garden from a broad perspective generally defines it as a vegetable gardening in North America. Whereas the concept of Korean community gardens when taken from a narrow perspective centers on horticulture. Taken from the broad perspective, Korean community gardens may be differentiated into four types: the neighborhood type, the unused land utilization type, the housing complex type, and the foothold connection type. Taken from the narrow perspective, the community garden is centered on horticulture and has been named the ‘Nuri garden’. According to its geographical conditions and the users’ characteristics, the Nuri garden can be sub-divided into the Nuri Participation garden, the Nuri Sharing garden, the Nuri Sympathy garden, and the Nuri Loan garden. These four Nuri garden types can be positioned in relation to the two intersecting axes, the value-centered axis and the substantiality-centered axis. In addition, according to the results of the experts’ survey, joint cultivation types located within residential areas, within walking distance, and with open designs were those most preferred as a Korean community garden.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰
Ⅲ. 일본의 커뮤니티가든
Ⅳ. 한국적 맥락의 커뮤니티가든
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-595-001916962