메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제25권 제4호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
251 - 289 (39page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In Korea, many claims for damages caused by directors' business judgment have been made since late 1990s, and the Korean Supreme Court and lower courts have applied Korean version of the business judgment rule to these cases in order that they judged whether directors breached their duty of care or not. Strictly speaking, the business judgment rule adopted by Korean courts is not the same principle that the business judgment rule is applies in USA, but the rationale underlying the business judgment rule in USA is acceptable in Korea. To encourage directors to perform creative and positive management, it is necessary to permit directors to enjoy a wide range of discretionary power in making business decisions. On the other hand, in order for directors to fulfill the duty of care, it is also necessary to establish a criterion for directors' good performance of the duty of care. It is thought that it is appropriate and reasonable to examine the following requirements in judging whether directors breached their duty of care or not: 1) Being a business judgment, 2) Being informed with respect to the subject of the business judgment, 3) Making business decision in the reasonable belief that it is coincident with the best interest of company, 4) Not having individual interests and conflicts of interests with company in making business decision.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (43)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0