해부학적 인형 사용과 조사자의 질문유형에 따른 성폭력 피해 아동의 반응 연구

이재웅; 조은경

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 이재웅 조은경

저널정보: 한국피해자학회 피해자학연구 피해자학연구 제17권 제2호

발행연도: 2009.1

수록면: 133 - 149 (17page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

In the present study, we hypothesized that child victims' reactions to anatomical dolls might interact with interviewer’s utterance types. We analyzed child victims’ response types with regard to anatomical dolls’ utterance types, to examine how an anatomical doll can affect child victims' response, researchers analyzed child victims' responses according to the presence of the anatomical doll with additional factor, the type of interviewer’s utterance. Five video-recorded child sexual abuse victim interviews with an anatomical doll were analyzed. The victims were from two age groups, 3 years(n=3) and 5 years(n=1), and included one boy. All videotapes were transcribed and two trained coders categorized verbal and nonverbal responses of the child and investigator. The trained coders first identified segments where anatomical dolls were used(doll phase) versus not used(no doll phase). After that, interviewer’s utterances and child victim’s responses were coded according to a coding scheme. Descriptive analysis of the data revealed that the interviewers frequently used directive utterances, option-posing questions, and suggestive questions throughout the interview. The interviewers employed cued invitation and multiple questions more in the doll phase than in the no-doll phase. Child victims showed digressive responses more frequently in the doll phase than in the no doll phase. It was also found that digressive behaviors tended to appear with directive utterances, option-posing questions, and suggestive questions by the interviewers. The results suggest that in general investigators were less likely to use open-ended questions when interviewing child victims, especially younger victims. Moreover, when interviewers used anatomical dolls combined with directive or close-ended utterances, younger children were more likely to become distracted from the interview. It can be inferred that children younger than 5 years old may consider the doll as a plaything rather than a demonstrative aid, thus, may not focus on the interviewer’s words, and may become easily inattentive. The fact that child victims were not given understandable instructions about the purpose of an anatomical doll during the interview might have contributed to the child's digressive responses. There is a limitation of generalizing the results of this study, however, because of its small sample size. Thus, a further sophisticated field study with a larger sample would be needed.

In the present study, we hypothesized that child victims' reactions to anatomical dolls might interact with interviewer’s utterance types. We analyzed child victims’ response types with regard to anatomical dolls’ utterance types, to examine how an anatomical doll can affect child victims' response, researchers analyzed child victims' responses according to the presence of the anatomical doll with additional factor, the type of interviewer’s utterance. Five video-recorded child sexual abuse victim interviews with an anatomical doll were analyzed. The victims were from two age groups, 3 years(n=3) and 5 years(n=1), and included one boy. All videotapes were transcribed and two trained coders categorized verbal and nonverbal responses of the child and investigator. The trained coders first identified segments where anatomical dolls were used(doll phase) versus not used(no doll phase). After that, interviewer’s utterances and child victim’s responses were coded according to a coding scheme. Descriptive analysis of the data revealed that the interviewers frequently used directive utterances, option-posing questions, and suggestive questions throughout the interview. The interviewers employed cued invitation and multiple questions more in the doll phase than in the no-doll phase. Child victims showed digressive responses more frequently in the doll phase than in the no doll phase. It was also found that digressive behaviors tended to appear with directive utterances, option-posing questions, and suggestive questions by the interviewers. The results suggest that in general investigators were less likely to use open-ended questions when interviewing child victims, especially younger victims. Moreover, when interviewers used anatomical dolls combined with directive or close-ended utterances, younger children were more likely to become distracted from the interview. It can be inferred that children younger than 5 years old may consider the doll as a plaything rather than a demonstrative aid, thus, may not focus on the interviewer’s words, and may become easily inattentive. The fact that child victims were not given understandable instructions about the purpose of an anatomical doll during the interview might have contributed to the child's digressive responses. There is a limitation of generalizing the results of this study, however, because of its small sample size. Thus, a further sophisticated field study with a larger sample would be needed.

#anatomical doll #child sexual abuse #investigative interviewing #question types

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

Boat, B. W / 1993 / The use of anatomical dolls in sexual abuse evaluations: Current research and practice in Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony / Guil

Boat, B. W / 1994 / Exploration of anatomical dolls by nonreferred preschool-aged children: Comparisons by age, gender, race, and socioeconomic status / Child Abuse and Negle

Bruck, M / 1995 / Anatomically detailed dolls do not facilitate preschoolers' reports of a pediatric examination involving genital touching / Journal of Experimental Psycholo

Criminal Justice System / 2007 / Achieving best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guidance on interviewing victims and witnesses, and using special measures / Criminal Justice System

DeLoache, J. S / 1995 / The use of dolls to interview young children: Issues of symbolic representation / Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 60 : 155 ~ 173

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이재웅

소속기관 한국피해자학회

주요연구분야 사회과학 > 법학

논문수 1 이용수 11

조은경

소속기관 동국대학교 경찰사법대학

주요연구분야 사회과학 > 법학

논문수 5 이용수 227

최근 본 자료

전체보기

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

초록· 키워드

AI 요약

연구주제

연구배경

연구방법

연구결과

주요내용

목차

참고문헌 (19)

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)