메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이재목 (충북대학교)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제27권 제1호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
23 - 47 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In case that multiple creditors respectively practiced sales reservation and finished provisional registration (so called completion of a reservation sales rights as a joint name) to secure their claims. Belonging types of the completion right and forms of the original registration petition lawsuit have been problems. Of course these problems are happen when persons directly involved do not clearly determine a practice method in the completion of a reservation sales rights(lets' call this CRSR following sentences). According to precedents by traditional supreme court for these matters, "when there are multiple creditors for one debtor, the debtor and multiple creditors make a contract to secure theirs claims as multiple creditors to be joint holders of right for the debtor's real estate. therefore they practice a provisional registration to preserve claim of the ownership transfer registration, they(multiple creditors) have relation with quasimiteigentum CRSR among themselves. Owing to practicing CRSR and following this lawsuit asking for transferring of ownership registration are all acts of disposal of CRSR, expression willing to practice CRSR must be jointly practiced by all multiple creditors. AS a lawsuit asking for fulfilling a original registration of the ownership to be transferred for sales reservation completed sales object is necessary co-litigation, so all multiple creditors joining CRSR as Quasimiteigentum must filed a lawsuit jointly. This paper is written to re-look the meaning of following handled decision in a new viewpoint and make a difference with the past precedents more clearly. This precedent hold that in case that multiple creditors got CRSR by sales reservation, they are relative in Quasimiteigentum for the object. And this precedent changed traditional decisions having connected a expression of will of CRSR with petition asking for original registration action of disposal and necessary joint litigation within a limited condition. This means it accept a few consistent critical theories. In this verdict, Whether multiple creditors have jointly CRSR or each creditor has respective independent CRSR according to their share(or quota) depends on contents of the sales reservation. When these contents are not proposedly determined in a sales reservation, Motive and details of multiple creditors jointly contracting a sales reservation, security' purpose to achieve by the sales reservation, whether their will to wield security related rights is or not, whether each creditor express concrete right of quota or not, whether quota ratio coincide with secured claim ratio or not, whether custom establishing provisionally registered security right is or not, as so on are to be considered synthetically in adjudging it. In particular, this decision admitted each creditor' respective independent exercise of a right, focusing on his(each creditor's) 'whether expression of right quota and the ratio coincide with secured claim or not'. In considering the necessity of respect of principle of private autonomy, change of registration execution, mitigation of excessive restriction of creditor' right to foreclose for his quota sort of things. This uttered decision has to be largely reviewed when consider this beefing up the function of sales reservation' security for a claim, enable it to satisfy request of the common practices of transaction.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0