메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사교육연구회 역사교육 역사교육 제93집
발행연도
2005.3
수록면
67 - 108 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this article, the contents of authorized world history textbooks published under the 1st-7th national curricula were analyzed in terms of Chinese popular movements. Generally speaking, in the Chinese history, popular movement is a very important ingredient. The understanding and appraisal of the influence which the popular movements had on the Chinese history have been changing. It can be also said in Korea. And these changing perspectives were thus reflected on the high school world history textbooks.
The evaluation of peasant rebellions(wars) in the narratives in the textbooks was changed from negative to objective and positive. About, from the third national curriculum, such changes occurred. After then, the contents and quantities of narratives about popular movements in textbooks have grown richer and more diverse. Especially, in the sixth national curriculum, such trends can be confirmed. They were caused by the normalization of diplomatic relations between Korea and China, and the change of domestic political situations. But, in the seventh national curriculum, narratives on the Chinese popular movements were withdrawed compared with the sixth in the aspects of the diversity of the contents and the quantity. That trend is thought to be deeply related with the current political, social and economical situations and the interest in this field was decreased.
From now on, narratives on the folk secret religion groups and the rebellions related with them should be changed. History scholars' interest and participation will be needed in the research and development of standards for the authorization of the highschool world history textbook.

목차

1. 서언
2. 중국 민중운동에 관한 이론 문제
3. 연구 방법
4. 교과서 서술 내용 분석
5. 결론
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015494284