지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Kim Kirim’s understanding of sentimentalism was inaccurate. As a result, he mistook feeling for sentiment and rejected the lyric genre, believing that it was simply an expression of emotion. Thus, this paper looked into the concepts such as feeling, emotion and sentimentality to analyze Kim Kirim’s misconception of lyrics. Perhaps, Kim failed to see the difference between the lyrics that is one of the three major genres of the Ancient Greece, and the lyrics that is its modern legacy. In short, the instability of his poetics resulted because he confused the ‘lyrics’ from the Greek genres with the modern ‘poetry’ and its subordinate genre, the ‘narrow sense of lyrics.’
Kim also believed that modernism can become one representation of a modern poetry by overcoming sentimentalism and content-focused attitude. But his definition of modernism is inconsistent and contradictory in general. Particularly, he used modernism as which includes both Britain and American(Anglo-American) modernism and European avant-garde, but sometimes he also limited it to that of Britain and American modernism only. However, these two modernisms cannot be used similarly since Britain and American modernism is based on the classicism whereas European avant-garde is based on the romanticism. Kim did not have clear and accurate understanding of western modern literary history. It can be said that Kim’s actual definition of modernism, in spite of his misusage, was that of Britain and American modernism.
What Kim referred to as a ‘new poetry’ may seem like a ‘modernism’ poetry. Others who have studied him state that it is similar to imagism or neo-classicism, especially intellectualism, poetry. What they did not mention, however, is the humanism. Kim’s idea of ‘new poetry’ combines humanism to intellectualism which is based on Hulme’s anti-humanism and anti-romanticism. But as these two concepts contradict each other, his idea could not be realized in practice. In short, Kim’s ‘new poetry’ is far from the actual intention and remains only as a notional concept.
Kim also believed that modernism can become one representation of a modern poetry by overcoming sentimentalism and content-focused attitude. But his definition of modernism is inconsistent and contradictory in general. Particularly, he used modernism as which includes both Britain and American(Anglo-American) modernism and European avant-garde, but sometimes he also limited it to that of Britain and American modernism only. However, these two modernisms cannot be used similarly since Britain and American modernism is based on the classicism whereas European avant-garde is based on the romanticism. Kim did not have clear and accurate understanding of western modern literary history. It can be said that Kim’s actual definition of modernism, in spite of his misusage, was that of Britain and American modernism.
What Kim referred to as a ‘new poetry’ may seem like a ‘modernism’ poetry. Others who have studied him state that it is similar to imagism or neo-classicism, especially intellectualism, poetry. What they did not mention, however, is the humanism. Kim’s idea of ‘new poetry’ combines humanism to intellectualism which is based on Hulme’s anti-humanism and anti-romanticism. But as these two concepts contradict each other, his idea could not be realized in practice. In short, Kim’s ‘new poetry’ is far from the actual intention and remains only as a notional concept.
목차
1. 머릿말
2. 시의 정의
3. 시와 감정
4. 서정시에 대한 오해
5. 모더니즘에 대한 오해
6. 새로운 시
7. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1980년대 한국시의 도시적 감수성 연구
한국시학연구
2000 .11
-
모더니즘, 미국시, 이미지(즘), 도시 - 김기림 시론과 시학
영어영문학21
2008 .01
-
김광균 시에 나타난 자아정체성 연구
한국시학연구
2000 .11
-
시의 4유형 고(考)
한국시학연구
2006 .08
-
서정시 이론 연구
한국현대문학연구
2005 .12
-
영미 모더니즘과 흄
인문언어
2008 .01
-
Re-presenting the New Woman: A Study in Comparative Modernisms
동서비교문학저널
2004 .12
-
김규동의 『새로운 시론』에 나타난 주제 고찰
어문학
2013 .03
-
1940년대 초 김광균의 비평적 시선과 서정시 : ‘서정’ 불능의 조건에서 서정시 쓰기
국어문학
2017 .11
-
‘新詩論’을 전후한 모더니즘 시운동의 흐름과 맥
어문론집
2000 .12
-
한국의 주지주의와 영미 모더니즘
동서비교문학저널
2007 .12
-
혁명의 시, 혹은 시의 혁명 －김남주론－
우리문학연구
2004 .12
-
20世紀 中國詩의 國際性 : 서방 모더니즘의 수용과 穆旦을 中心으로
외국문학연구
2005 .11
-
현대시의 공간 인식 방법 연구
우리말글
2003 .12
-
Korean History Study : Breaking away from Modernism
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
1999 .09
-
朴寅煥 詩의 모더니티와 詩史的 意味
어문론집
2011 .11
-
지용의 자연시와 성정(性情)의 탐구
한국현대문학연구
2002 .12
-
전환기 한국 현대시의 시 세계
한국시학연구
2009 .08
-
1950년대 모더니즘시의 서정성 : 김수영, 박인환 시를 중심으로
한국시학연구
2006 .08
-
모더니즘 시의 '현실'과 그 기호적 맥락-김광균의「서정시의 문제」를 중심으로
한국현대문학연구
1998 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-811-016459352