메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 企業法硏究 第22卷 第2號
발행연도
2008.6
수록면
259 - 281 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
??Door-to-door Sales etc Act (DDSA) which stipulates door-to-door sales(DDS), phone soliciting sales, multi-level marketing (MLM), continuous transaction, and business soliciting transaction was fully revised in 2002. The revision focused on the reinforcement of the consumer indemnity system by introducing mutual aid cooperative. Although, consumer damages have continued in MLM industry. Consequently, KFTC has recently taken legal actions to the major door to door sales companies such as Amore Pacific, Woong-Jin in the charge of operating their business as MLM so the cases have been instituted suits.
??Most consumer damage cases since 2007 have been caused by DDS companies which substantially operates their business using MLM organization. It has to be clear constitutional requisites of MLM organization, allowing for this situation. Accordingly, I would like to state about constitutional requisites for MLM organization based on the precedents of Supreme Court and KFTC.
??The Supreme Court has quashed the original judgment as following reasons; MLM constitution prerequisites are membership of salesperson at multiple levels (requiring at least three levels of salespersons) and the provision of economic allowances (retail profit and support allowances). also the Supreme Court stated that people were induced to become salespersons through a share of retail profits and support allowances for product sales and the recruitment of salespersons, and because this same proc ess was cumulatively repeated over three or more levels, such an organization MLM organization, even if the payment of support allowances was not affected by the sales quantities of lower- level salespersons not directly under oneself.
??This sentence as it called Hwang-Sam Nara Jurisdiction (2005-DO-977) made it clear in terms of the concept and elements of MLM as the first case after DDSA revision in 2002. Based on the Supreme Court decision, FTC made Guideline for Consumer Protection to regulate DDS company which operates their business as MLM. In addition, it has significant contribution to make the DDS companies, which substantially operates their sales organization as MLM, consumer indemnity insurancecontract. Major DDS companies have insisted that the constitutional requisites of MLM organization are insufficient in order to distinguish between MLM and DDS in current law. So they present that additional requisites, which are about recruitment, retail profit, and support allowance etc, have been added.
??However, these opinions are considered unreasonable and misinterpreted the DDSA Article 2 (5) and (7).
??MLM has been strictly regulated compared to DDS in recent DDSA, so many companies registered as DDS but they have operated their business as MLM substantially due to this. Additionally, these DDS companies neither make consumer indemnity insurance contacts nor get any regulations from government agency. Consequently, those companies have been caused consumer damage using pyramid scheme or illegal fund-raising business without any inspection. It is the key reason that the definition of MLM is relatively unclear in current DDSA so it is necessary to make it complete to regulate effectively.

목차

Ⅰ. 글 머리에
Ⅱ. 다단계판매조직의 성립요건에 관한 대법원 판례 등
Ⅲ. 대법원 판례등의 사회적ㆍ법적 배경
Ⅳ. 대법원 판례 등에 대한 평가
Ⅴ. 입법론
Ⅵ. 맺으며
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (36)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 연관된 판례 (3)

  • 대법원 2006. 2. 10. 선고 2005도8357 판결

    자세히 보기
  • 대구지방법원 2007. 3. 23. 선고 2006노3935 판결

    [1] 방문판매 등에 관한 법률 제13조 제1항 및 제23조 제1항이 적용되는 `다단계판매업자’란 판매업자가 특정인에게 당해 판매업자가 공급하는 재화 등을 소비자( 같은 법 시행령 제4조 제3호에 의해 다단계판매원이 되고자 다단계판매업자로부터 재화 등을 최초로 구매하는 자도 포함된다)

    자세히 보기
  • 대법원 1995. 5. 26. 선고 94도1544 판결

    가. 구 방문판매등에관한법률(1995.1.5. 법률 제4896호로 전문 개정되기 전의 것) 제18조 제3항, 제1항, 제2항이 금지하고 있는 다단계판매조직에 해당하기 위하여는 ① 방문판매업자와 그 판매업자의 권유를 받은 자(상대방) 간의 상품의 판매계약을 기초로 하여 그 상대방과 상대방의 권유에 기인하여 순차적·단계적으로 그 조직의 구

    자세히 보기

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-014826559