개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
??Door-to-door Sales etc Act (DDSA) which stipulates door-to-door sales(DDS), phone soliciting sales, multi-level marketing (MLM), continuous transaction, and business soliciting transaction was fully revised in 2002. The revision focused on the reinforcement of the consumer indemnity system by introducing mutual aid cooperative. Although, consumer damages have continued in MLM industry. Consequently, KFTC has recently taken legal actions to the major door to door sales companies such as Amore Pacific, Woong-Jin in the charge of operating their business as MLM so the cases have been instituted suits.
??Most consumer damage cases since 2007 have been caused by DDS companies which substantially operates their business using MLM organization. It has to be clear constitutional requisites of MLM organization, allowing for this situation. Accordingly, I would like to state about constitutional requisites for MLM organization based on the precedents of Supreme Court and KFTC.
??The Supreme Court has quashed the original judgment as following reasons; MLM constitution prerequisites are membership of salesperson at multiple levels (requiring at least three levels of salespersons) and the provision of economic allowances (retail profit and support allowances). also the Supreme Court stated that people were induced to become salespersons through a share of retail profits and support allowances for product sales and the recruitment of salespersons, and because this same proc ess was cumulatively repeated over three or more levels, such an organization MLM organization, even if the payment of support allowances was not affected by the sales quantities of lower- level salespersons not directly under oneself.
??This sentence as it called Hwang-Sam Nara Jurisdiction (2005-DO-977) made it clear in terms of the concept and elements of MLM as the first case after DDSA revision in 2002. Based on the Supreme Court decision, FTC made Guideline for Consumer Protection to regulate DDS company which operates their business as MLM. In addition, it has significant contribution to make the DDS companies, which substantially operates their sales organization as MLM, consumer indemnity insurancecontract. Major DDS companies have insisted that the constitutional requisites of MLM organization are insufficient in order to distinguish between MLM and DDS in current law. So they present that additional requisites, which are about recruitment, retail profit, and support allowance etc, have been added.
??However, these opinions are considered unreasonable and misinterpreted the DDSA Article 2 (5) and (7).
??MLM has been strictly regulated compared to DDS in recent DDSA, so many companies registered as DDS but they have operated their business as MLM substantially due to this. Additionally, these DDS companies neither make consumer indemnity insurance contacts nor get any regulations from government agency. Consequently, those companies have been caused consumer damage using pyramid scheme or illegal fund-raising business without any inspection. It is the key reason that the definition of MLM is relatively unclear in current DDSA so it is necessary to make it complete to regulate effectively.
??Most consumer damage cases since 2007 have been caused by DDS companies which substantially operates their business using MLM organization. It has to be clear constitutional requisites of MLM organization, allowing for this situation. Accordingly, I would like to state about constitutional requisites for MLM organization based on the precedents of Supreme Court and KFTC.
??The Supreme Court has quashed the original judgment as following reasons; MLM constitution prerequisites are membership of salesperson at multiple levels (requiring at least three levels of salespersons) and the provision of economic allowances (retail profit and support allowances). also the Supreme Court stated that people were induced to become salespersons through a share of retail profits and support allowances for product sales and the recruitment of salespersons, and because this same proc ess was cumulatively repeated over three or more levels, such an organization MLM organization, even if the payment of support allowances was not affected by the sales quantities of lower- level salespersons not directly under oneself.
??This sentence as it called Hwang-Sam Nara Jurisdiction (2005-DO-977) made it clear in terms of the concept and elements of MLM as the first case after DDSA revision in 2002. Based on the Supreme Court decision, FTC made Guideline for Consumer Protection to regulate DDS company which operates their business as MLM. In addition, it has significant contribution to make the DDS companies, which substantially operates their sales organization as MLM, consumer indemnity insurancecontract. Major DDS companies have insisted that the constitutional requisites of MLM organization are insufficient in order to distinguish between MLM and DDS in current law. So they present that additional requisites, which are about recruitment, retail profit, and support allowance etc, have been added.
??However, these opinions are considered unreasonable and misinterpreted the DDSA Article 2 (5) and (7).
??MLM has been strictly regulated compared to DDS in recent DDSA, so many companies registered as DDS but they have operated their business as MLM substantially due to this. Additionally, these DDS companies neither make consumer indemnity insurance contacts nor get any regulations from government agency. Consequently, those companies have been caused consumer damage using pyramid scheme or illegal fund-raising business without any inspection. It is the key reason that the definition of MLM is relatively unclear in current DDSA so it is necessary to make it complete to regulate effectively.
목차
Ⅰ. 글 머리에
Ⅱ. 다단계판매조직의 성립요건에 관한 대법원 판례 등
Ⅲ. 대법원 판례등의 사회적ㆍ법적 배경
Ⅳ. 대법원 판례 등에 대한 평가
Ⅴ. 입법론
Ⅵ. 맺으며
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (36)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (3)
-
대법원 2006. 2. 10. 선고 2005도8357 판결
자세히 보기 -
대구지방법원 2007. 3. 23. 선고 2006노3935 판결
[1] 방문판매 등에 관한 법률 제13조 제1항 및 제23조 제1항이 적용되는 `다단계판매업자’란 판매업자가 특정인에게 당해 판매업자가 공급하는 재화 등을 소비자( 같은 법 시행령 제4조 제3호에 의해 다단계판매원이 되고자 다단계판매업자로부터 재화 등을 최초로 구매하는 자도 포함된다)
자세히 보기 -
대법원 1995. 5. 26. 선고 94도1544 판결
가. 구 방문판매등에관한법률(1995.1.5. 법률 제4896호로 전문 개정되기 전의 것) 제18조 제3항, 제1항, 제2항이 금지하고 있는 다단계판매조직에 해당하기 위하여는 ① 방문판매업자와 그 판매업자의 권유를 받은 자(상대방) 간의 상품의 판매계약을 기초로 하여 그 상대방과 상대방의 권유에 기인하여 순차적·단계적으로 그 조직의 구
자세히 보기
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
MLM(Multi-Level Marketing)기업의 판매원 활동기간 영향요인에 관한 연구
글로벌경영학회지
2020 .01
-
다단계판매의 개념 및 판단기준에 대한 고찰
재산법연구
2010 .01
-
다단계판매의 새로운 유형과 소비자보호에 관한 고찰
아주법학
2012 .01
-
방문ㆍ다단계판매의 판단기준에 관한 비교법적 고찰
기업법연구
2008 .09
-
다단계판매분야에서의 소비자피해예방시스템개선 및 공제조합의 발전방안
법학논총
2011 .07
-
다단계판매회사의 광고 선전비와 후원수당 지출의 경영전략 타당성에 대한 실증분석
대한경영학회 학술발표대회 발표논문집
2014 .11
-
Building a Sustainable Competitive Advantage for Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) Firms: An Empirical Investigation of Contributing Factors
유통과학연구
2019 .01
-
홍보관 등 특설판매업에서의 소비자 보호방안에 관한 연구
한양법학
2010 .08
-
The Influences of Up-line Distributors' Transformational Leadership on Down-line Distributors' Entrepreneurship, Market Orientation and Performance
유통연구
2010 .07
-
The Effect of Core Self-Evaluation of Female Salesperson on Sales Performance
유통과학연구
2019 .01
-
방문판매법상 소비자피해보상 보험계약 제도에 관한 고찰 : 예치계약 제도 도입에 따른 문제점을 중심으로
기업법연구
2009 .03
-
방문판매의 정의에 관한 연구
저스티스
2012 .06
-
일본 특상법상의 방문판매와 연쇄판매거래의 개념에 관한 고찰
비교사법
2009 .12
-
방문판매 영업의 지역거점 구조 개선에 관한 연구 : 공간통계기법을 이용한 매출 분포분석을 중심으로
마케팅연구
2009 .12
-
네트워크마케팅업체의 후원수당에 관한 실증적 연구
문화산업연구
2003 .06
-
상품진열이 중간상의 상품선택에 미치는 영향 : 다단계 판매회사의 생필품 매장을 중심으로
유통연구
2005 .01
-
일본의 방문판매에 관한 법개정 논의
비교사법
2008 .03
-
Higher-Order Goals, Trust-in-Leader, and Self-Efficacy as Mediators of Transformational Leadership Performance : The Case of Multi-level Marketing Organizations in China
Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
2018 .12
-
How Sales Force Control System affects Salesperson`s Behavioral Strategy and Sales Performance
한국유통학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2016 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-014826559