지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this essay is to investigate whether or not the Korea Media Rating Board is violating the constitutional Freedom of Expression which our Constitution guarantees. The Freedom of Expression which is the basic foundation for the political decision makings is very important for the maintenance of the system of Democracy. Since Movies are a form of communication media, freedom of expression should be applied to it even though it is a form of entertainment and industry as well. If Freedom of Expression which our Constitution guarantees is applied fully on movies, our rating system which has the power to limit the possibility of showing of certain films is unconstitutional.
First, the fact that the governmental Rating Board exercise censorship is unconstitutional.
Second, the current Motion Picture Act which authorizes the board to decide whether or not a film is to be shown is unconstitutional.
Third, the possibility that any movie under our rating system could be banned from adult viewing is also unconstitutional.
The basic point of the proposed bill to revise the Motion Picture Act in 2000 seeks to authorize the Board the right to not classify certain movies and to implement a system for restricted adult-only theaters. But these provisions are worthless in part.
The first problem with the Bill is that the Board still have the right to restrict the showing of any movie.
Second, it is improper and difficult for the committees of the Board who are not specialists in law to make any legal decisions.
Third, the classification of movies with the three ratings (NC-19, Restricted Permission and No Rating) for underage viewers is meaningless.
I' d like to make some proposals to improve our current movie rating system.
First, the introduction of a 'Restricted Permission rating is improper. The board should classify only the movies which they are able to. and those movies which they do not classify should be permitted to be shown at the special theaters for "No rating" movies.
Second, any movie which contravene any current criminal act should be punished by the court through criminal and administrative process. The Board should not decide whether a movie violates existing law beforehand.
In conclusion, the current rating board under the control of government should be abolished and a voluntary movie rating system be introduced.
First, the fact that the governmental Rating Board exercise censorship is unconstitutional.
Second, the current Motion Picture Act which authorizes the board to decide whether or not a film is to be shown is unconstitutional.
Third, the possibility that any movie under our rating system could be banned from adult viewing is also unconstitutional.
The basic point of the proposed bill to revise the Motion Picture Act in 2000 seeks to authorize the Board the right to not classify certain movies and to implement a system for restricted adult-only theaters. But these provisions are worthless in part.
The first problem with the Bill is that the Board still have the right to restrict the showing of any movie.
Second, it is improper and difficult for the committees of the Board who are not specialists in law to make any legal decisions.
Third, the classification of movies with the three ratings (NC-19, Restricted Permission and No Rating) for underage viewers is meaningless.
I' d like to make some proposals to improve our current movie rating system.
First, the introduction of a 'Restricted Permission rating is improper. The board should classify only the movies which they are able to. and those movies which they do not classify should be permitted to be shown at the special theaters for "No rating" movies.
Second, any movie which contravene any current criminal act should be punished by the court through criminal and administrative process. The Board should not decide whether a movie violates existing law beforehand.
In conclusion, the current rating board under the control of government should be abolished and a voluntary movie rating system be introduced.
목차
Ⅰ. 서문
Ⅱ. 표현의 자유 일반론
Ⅲ. 영화가 누리는 표현의 자유
Ⅳ. 등급분류제도의 위헌성
Ⅴ. 정부 영화법 개정안에 대한 검토
Ⅵ. 검열제도의 개선방향에 관한 제안
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
우리영화 심의제도에 대한 논의
영화연구
2008 .08
-
A Proposal on an Alternative Operation System for Restricted Theaters
TECHART: Journal of Arts and Imaging Science
2015 .05
-
한국 기획영화에 관한 연구 : 〈결혼이야기〉를 중심으로
영화연구
2007 .09
-
“영화의 이해” 교양 교육이 영화 이해도에 미치는 영향
영화연구
2007 .04
-
중국의 한국영화 수용에 대한 연구 : 2006-2008년
영화연구
2010 .03
-
네티즌 온라인 영화평점과 국가 간 영화흥행 요인 : 2007~2008년 한국에서 개봉한 미국영화를 중심으로
영화연구
2009 .12
-
영화산업의 독과점 실태와 해소 방안
스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법
2017 .01
-
미국 개봉 한국영화의 문화 담론 연구
영화연구
2010 .09
-
관객의 영화선택 지각에 영향을 미치는 마케팅 변수에 관한 연구
영화연구
2004 .06
-
일제강점기하 영화통제정책의 초기형성과정에 관한 고찰
현대영화연구
2009 .01
-
한국 상업영화의 소재와 주제에 관한 연구
영상기술연구
2019 .12
-
영화로 표현 된 공감(共感)적 감정 미학 : Monster's Ball(2001), Love Letter(1995)를 중심으로
영화연구
2010 .06
-
1920년대 초 조선총독부「 활동사진반」의 역할에 관한 연구
영화연구
2004 .12
-
멜로 영화의 내적 리듬과 이미지에 관한 연구 : 이와이 순지 감독의 〈러브레터〉, 허진호 감독의 〈봄날은 간다〉 중심으로
영화연구
2013 .03
-
｢활동사진필름검열규칙｣의 검열수수료 문제와 조선영화산업의 변화* 21)
현대영화연구
2011 .01
-
중국 미디어법제도 대외개방의 발전과 입법과제
스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법
2014 .01
-
Debating the Role of the Korea Media Rating Board : Film Rating Class
TECHART: Journal of Arts and Imaging Science
2014 .08
-
리얼리즘으로 줌인한 현실과 시로 줌아웃한 작가의식- 영화 〈시〉 의 스토리텔링 연구 -
현대영화연구
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0