지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
When equality is defined as essence of justice, realization of equality means realization of justice and realization of justice in turn signifies the realization of the society in substantial equality. The Constitution in every nation has Equal Right Clause and it is considered as one of the most important and fundamental rights. In Article 11 of our Constitutional Law, equality before the law is mentioned.
But throughout history, the social and structural discrimination is endured to man. though the contemporary democratic constitution includes legal protection of equal rights, traditional value-neutral interpretation of equal rights was not sufficient to em body substantial equality. To solve the problem of the discrimination like this, the gap between legal or mechanical ideology of equality and substantial equality appears to be reduced by 'affirmative action' in present discriminatory situations. The term 'affirmative action' generally can be used to describe any plan or program designed to redress the effects of past and current unlawful or wrongful discrimination to man in allocation public or private economic and other resources or opportunities in society.
The effectiveness of affirmative action in eliminating discrimination and achieving substantial equality between man and man is obvious, but it is double-edged sword with the potential to violate the rights of majority since it is a form of inequal treatment privileging the disadvantaged on minority, while causing reverse discrimination on majority. therefore, Affirmative Actions must be deliberately designed to observe the range of legislative discretion and the lim it of the Constitutional law at the purpose of attainment of substantial equal right and social integration and of promotion of surroundings to realize substantial equality of opportunity.
The affirmative action is necessary for the social unity and development of democracy. The courts of advanced nations have supported the use of affirmative action as a remedy for societal discrimination. Implementation of an affirmative action program can be an effective way to quickly eradicate intentional, statistical, or institutionalized discrimination. And to solve the problem of the reverse discrimination and unconstitutionality of affirmative action, the discussion about preparation of constitutional basis of affirmative action is required.
But throughout history, the social and structural discrimination is endured to man. though the contemporary democratic constitution includes legal protection of equal rights, traditional value-neutral interpretation of equal rights was not sufficient to em body substantial equality. To solve the problem of the discrimination like this, the gap between legal or mechanical ideology of equality and substantial equality appears to be reduced by 'affirmative action' in present discriminatory situations. The term 'affirmative action' generally can be used to describe any plan or program designed to redress the effects of past and current unlawful or wrongful discrimination to man in allocation public or private economic and other resources or opportunities in society.
The effectiveness of affirmative action in eliminating discrimination and achieving substantial equality between man and man is obvious, but it is double-edged sword with the potential to violate the rights of majority since it is a form of inequal treatment privileging the disadvantaged on minority, while causing reverse discrimination on majority. therefore, Affirmative Actions must be deliberately designed to observe the range of legislative discretion and the lim it of the Constitutional law at the purpose of attainment of substantial equal right and social integration and of promotion of surroundings to realize substantial equality of opportunity.
The affirmative action is necessary for the social unity and development of democracy. The courts of advanced nations have supported the use of affirmative action as a remedy for societal discrimination. Implementation of an affirmative action program can be an effective way to quickly eradicate intentional, statistical, or institutionalized discrimination. And to solve the problem of the reverse discrimination and unconstitutionality of affirmative action, the discussion about preparation of constitutional basis of affirmative action is required.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 평등 개념의 변화와 우리헌법상의 평등권
Ⅲ. 평등권의 효력에 관한 현대적 이론
Ⅳ. 적극적 평등실현조치
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
양성평등을 위한 적극적 평등실현조치의 헌법적 근거마련의 필요성
원광법학
2009 .01
-
여성을 위한 적극적 우대조치에 관한 연구
서강법학
2008 .06
-
남녀평등과 적극적 평등화조치
법철학연구
2001 .05
-
적극적 평등화조치와 정의의 문제
서강법학
2000 .03
-
적극적 평등실현조치의 위헌심사기준에 대한 검토 - 남아프리카공화국의 사례를 중심으로 -
인권과 정의
2019 .01
-
장애인관련 적극적 조치에 대한 법리적 정당화 고찰
한국사회정책
2017 .09
-
대학교육에서 기회균형선발제의 근거와 쟁점
교육실천연구
2009 .02
-
‘장애인차별금지 및 권리구제 등에 관한 법률’에 따른 법원의 차별시정조치 판결 : 2014. 7. 3. 선고 2013 가합 2599 판결을 중심으로
법이론실무연구
2016 .10
-
平等關聯 美國聯邦大法院 判例의 近來의 動向
공법학연구
2005 .12
-
고용상 구조적 차별의 시정과 적극적 조치 : 캐나다의 논의를 중심으로
이화젠더법학
2016 .09
-
여성주의 관점에서 본 헌법상의 양성평등
중앙법학
2006 .04
-
적극적 고용개선조치와 헌법상의 평등권 : 한국과 미국 헌법의 분석을 중심으로
중앙법학
2009 .10
-
평등권의 미국 헌법상 논의 : 미국 헌법상 성평등 논의와 우리 성별영향분석평가법에의 시사점을 중심으로
미국헌법연구
2013 .08
-
헌법상 평등에 관한 접근방안
법과 정책연구
2006 .12
-
교육에서의 평등 : 긍정적 차별화
사회이론
1989 .12
-
평등권이론의 발전과 현대적 의의 : 여성주의의 관점에서
법학논총
2009 .02
-
평등과 노동권에 근거한 (영미)고용차별법의 가치론적 이해
노동법연구
2009 .03
-
한국의 적극적 평등실현조치에 대한 이론적 고찰: 여성공무원 채용목표제를 중심으로
정부학연구
2013 .01
-
미국의 적극적 평등실현조치와 위헌심사기준
노동법연구
2008 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-360-002131031