메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이원삼 (한국기업데이터)
저널정보
(사)한국사법학회 비교사법 比較私法 通卷 第40號
발행연도
2008.3
수록면
373 - 416 (44page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since 1975 the SEC decided to create a wholly new regulatory category: “nationally recognized statistical rating organizations” (NRSROs). Only the NRSROs’ ratings would be valid for the determination of the broker-dealers’ capital requirements.
In the wake of the Enron bankruptcy and other corporate scandals, the SEC’s NRSRO designation system (and its opaqueness) received attention, as did the potential for conflicts of interest in the issuer-pay model, since a bond rating firm might threaten an issuer with a poor rating unless the latter paid the rater a sufficient fee or agreed to purchase other (e.g., consulting) services from the rater.
However as President Bush signed the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006, it made an end of the SEC’s haphazard regulation of this industry over the past 31 years. And the reform could well be as important for the development of U.S. capital markets as any likely reform of Sarbanes-Oxley.
There are three major rating firms in Korea. Rating firms should strictly comply with the Use and Protection of Credit Information Act(hereafter the Act), also rating Agency is supervised by the act. The act already used registration system.
However there differ from requirement of decision criterion. The reform act depends on market test but the Act is not. It ignorant market faith about credit rating. This paper analyze major issues of the reform act; the legislation substitutes for the SEC’s opaque NRSRO designation system a relatively transparent and open registration system, and tries to avoid specifying any particular business model, etc., and then suggests some legal suggestions.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 신용평가의 변천과 기능
Ⅲ. 미국 신용평가회사개혁법의 입법배경
Ⅳ. 미국 신용평가회사개혁법의 주요 내용과 입법정책적 시사점
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001530689