메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박성호 (계명대학교)
저널정보
계명대학교 산학연구소 경영경제 경영경제 제43집 제2호
발행연도
2010.8
수록면
57 - 83 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Institute Cargo Clauses(ICC) have been continuously revised in accordance with changes of insurance market and maritime transport environment since the ICC established in 1912. The latest edition of the ICC became available to the insurance market on 1st January 2009. This article especially deals with “Exclusion Clause” which stipulates exclusion of risk for insurer among 19 clauses in the ICC. The clause first introduced in the ICC (1982).
In the ICC (2009), there have been revised 3 articles - Arts. 4, 5, and 7 - from the ICC (1982). First, insufficiency of packing has been clarified - if a container is stowed by an independent contractor prior to attachment of cover, the exclusion does not apply. Second, the word “proximately” is deleted as delay cannot be a proximate clause of loss. Third, “Insolvency Exclusion” from the “Commodity Trades Clauses” thereby covering a “purchase in good faith under a binding contract”. Fourth, nuclear fission and/or fusion exclusions have been widened in light of the increased use of nuclear material bringing them in line with the opening words of causation in the extended radioactive contamination clause. Fifth, unseaworthiness exclusion has been modified to limit the exclusion in relation to unfitness of vehicles or containers to cases where the assured or their employees are privy to such unfitness. Lastly, in the strikes exclusion, “terrorism” is defined as “caused by any person acting from a political, ideological, or religious motive”.
Therefore, in comparison with the ICC (1982), the ICC (2009) have been modified to be advantageous to the Insured and/or clarify market terms and practice. Yet, some of clauses are disadvantageous to the Insured.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. ICC의 제정과 변천
Ⅲ. ICC(1982)와 ICC(2009) 면책조항의 비교분석
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
SUMMARY

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0