지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 85 (85page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Defense industry corruption has now become an important national and social issue. It brings about not only wide-spread public anger, but also significantly aggravates public trust in the civilian government and the military. Furthermore, there is rising skepticism that the criminal justice system might not be functioning properly in reducing defense industry corruption offences.
In contrast to other categories of corruption offences, those committed in the defense industry are more serious offences causing critical ripple effects threatening the very foundation of our national security.
Given the hostile confrontation between two Koreas, such corruption has also been considered as treason conferring crucial advantages on the adversarial state. As such, several bills aiming at punishing corruption in defense industry as an act of treason were submitted in the 20<SUP>th</SUP> session of the National Assembly.
With such legislative attempts reflecting a nationwide consensus on the needs for severe punishment of defense industry corruption, this research examines whether it is appropriate, effective, and advisable or not to punish defense industry corruption as treason in the current context of criminal law. Based on such examination, this research also seeks for a reasonable criminal policy designed to prevent and deter defense industry corruption effectively.
In line with a series of reforms aimed at exterminating defense industry corruption, a criminal justice policy administering a zero-tolerance principle seems to be in urgent need. However, these actions and policy belong primarily to the area of criminal justice or criminal procedure where defense industry corruption cases are investigated and prosecuted.
Legislative measures such as the “Special Act on Defense Industry Corruption Punishment”, directed at deterring corrupt practices through aggravated punishment, could be considered implemented as a last resort in the form of law of temporary duration. Even in this case, however, the types of crime and illegality in the context of the systemicity of the criminal law must be thoroughly examined to provide for reasonable rules and regulations with regards to the composition of the crime and the prescription of punishment.
In contrast to other categories of corruption offences, those committed in the defense industry are more serious offences causing critical ripple effects threatening the very foundation of our national security.
Given the hostile confrontation between two Koreas, such corruption has also been considered as treason conferring crucial advantages on the adversarial state. As such, several bills aiming at punishing corruption in defense industry as an act of treason were submitted in the 20<SUP>th</SUP> session of the National Assembly.
With such legislative attempts reflecting a nationwide consensus on the needs for severe punishment of defense industry corruption, this research examines whether it is appropriate, effective, and advisable or not to punish defense industry corruption as treason in the current context of criminal law. Based on such examination, this research also seeks for a reasonable criminal policy designed to prevent and deter defense industry corruption effectively.
In line with a series of reforms aimed at exterminating defense industry corruption, a criminal justice policy administering a zero-tolerance principle seems to be in urgent need. However, these actions and policy belong primarily to the area of criminal justice or criminal procedure where defense industry corruption cases are investigated and prosecuted.
Legislative measures such as the “Special Act on Defense Industry Corruption Punishment”, directed at deterring corrupt practices through aggravated punishment, could be considered implemented as a last resort in the form of law of temporary duration. Even in this case, however, the types of crime and illegality in the context of the systemicity of the criminal law must be thoroughly examined to provide for reasonable rules and regulations with regards to the composition of the crime and the prescription of punishment.
목차
[표지]
[발간사]
[목차]
표 차례
그림 차례
[국문요약]
[제1장 서론]
[제2장 방위산업비리의 발생 현황]
제1절 방위산업비리에 대한 개념 정의
제2절 방위산업비리의 발생 현황 개관
제3절 주요 방위산업비리의 유형
[제3장 방위산업비리범죄의 예방과 억제]
제1절 방산비리 예방의 중요성
제2절 방산비리 예방정책
제3절 방산비리범죄에 대한 형사소추
제4절 방산비리범죄에 대한 형사정책적 과제
[제4장 방위산업비리범죄에 대한 법정형의 검토]
제1절 방산비리범죄 처벌 강화 관련 법률안의 검토
제2절 방위산업비리범죄와 “이적행위”
제3절 방위산업비리범죄에 대한 가중처벌의 필요성
[제5장 결론]
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
형사정책연구 30년의 성과와 과제(II) : 형사법 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2019 .03
-
조선시대의 형사법제 연구 : 총칙의 현대 형사법 편제에 따른 재정립
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2015 .12
-
유기천의 생애와 형법학 - ‘과학적 형법관’의 이해를 위한 시론 -
형사법연구
2019 .01
-
조선시대의 형사법제 연구 : 조선 형사법제와 현행 형법과의 비교법적 검토(각론)
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2016 .12
-
伪满时期日伪刑罚适用评析
법학논총
2015 .01
-
합리적인 형사입법을 위한 방향
한양법학
2018 .08
-
Understanding Criminal Law in Korea
Journal of Korean Law
2024 .02
-
중대재해처벌법 경과와 제정 법률에 대한 비판적 검토
형사정책
2021 .01
-
陽村 申東旭 박사의 생애와 형법사상
형사법연구
2021 .12
-
특정범죄가중법 제5조의4의 성격 및 해석에 관한 판례 법리
형사판례연구
2021 .01
-
감염병 예방과 관리에 관한 형사처벌조항의 현황과 과제
법학논총
2021 .09
-
특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률 제5조의13 (일명 ‘민식이법’)에 대한 형법이론적 검토
법학연구
2021 .03
-
Criminal Procedure of Korea
Journal of Korean Law
2024 .02
-
법치국가에서의 안전지향형법에 대한 비판적 고찰
원광법학
2018 .01
-
성폭력 범죄 관련형사정책의 변화에 관한 연구
경찰학논총
2019 .01
-
일본의 형사 미성년자제도에관한 연구
한국치안행정논집
2019 .01
-
한 · 일 형사정책 동향 비교 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2015 .12
-
디지털 트랜스포메이션 시대의 6차산업 소비자의 특성과 만족도 분석
서비스경영학회지
2021 .09
-
4차 산업혁명에 있어 형법의 도전과제
법학논총
2017 .01
-
남북한 통일 이후의 과거청산 : 통일 전 북한의 범죄행위에 대한 통일 이후의 형사법적 처리
중앙법학
2015 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-364-002388178