메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한내과학회 대한내과학회지 대한내과학회지 제76권 제3호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
291 - 295 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has become a standard treatment for selected cases of early gastric cancer (EGC) because of its minimal invasiveness and comparable survival outcomes to surgical resection. The currently recognized indications of EMR for EGC are differentiated mucosal tumor < 2 cm for elevated and < 1 cm for flat and depressed type lesions. Recently, expanded criteria have been proposed in Japan. However, its wide acceptance is being limited in Korea by the lack of long-term outcome data and difficulty in pathological interpretation. In Korean multicenter study including 514 EGC cases resected by EMR, en bloc and complete resection rates were 71.8% and 77.6%, respectively. Local recurrence was detected in 24 cases (6.0%) after complete resection during the median 23.5 months of follow-up. Bleeding and perforation rates were 13.8% and 0.6%. Recently, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) method was introduced to overcome the size limitation of EMR and consequently to improve en bloc resection rate. This technique has been widely accepted in Korea these days. In Korean multicenter study including 534 EGC cases treated by ESD, en bloc and complete en bloc resection rates were 95.3% and 87.7%, respectively. Bleeding and perforation rates were 15.6% and 1.2%. To make EMR and ESD more reliable and safer methods of treating EGC, more long-term follow-up data and standardization of techniques and pathological interpretation were required.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0