메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙대학교 법학연구원 法學論文集 法學論文集 제40권 제2호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
151 - 207 (57page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since the founding Constitution of 1948, the judiciary provisions in our Constitutions have shown no small changes amid the political turmoils of the newly-born republic. In this article, I traced and examined the political backgrounds and legal references of the judiciary provisions in each Constitution. Through this work, I synthesized our past experiences of constitutional-judicial system building, diagnosed our present problems in the current Constitution, and suggested possible improvements for our future Constitution. Strongly limited by the arguments during the immediate post-liberation period, the changes in the judiciary provisions of our Constitutions were restricted mainly within the range of judges’ appointment and constitutional adjudication. Much more attention was paid to the independence of the judiciary rather than the democratization of judicial power. In formulating the judiciary provisions of our future Constitution, the value of democracy in the judicial branch should be fully recognized. Especially, articles concerning the local self-determination in the judicial sector and the extension of trial by jury should be provided in the Constitution. Besides, some provisions that originated from the Japanese Constitution, as well as such provisions as are obviously erroneous, should be replaced. Also, special consideration for those articles about which the Constitutional Court made important interpretations, should be given.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (64)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0