개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제48호
- 발행연도
- 2021.4
- 수록면
- 222 - 245 (24page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2021.4.48.222
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Psalm 106 is an intriguing text as it concerns various subject matters. In forty-eight verses, it deals with praise to the Lord which is followed by petition following, then switches its interest to report Israel’s history spanning from the days in Egypt to the exile, and returns and ends with another praise and petition to the Lord. Thus, scholars have tried to determine its nature and message with varying interests in the text.
Among various subjects, this article focuses on Israel’s sin in Psalm 106. Notably, it attempts to reveal the meaning of verses 13-15 and the function of the psalm’s structure. Concerning verses 13-15, there is no single scholarly consensus on the meaning of the passage. These verses are often referred to as one of the most puzzling texts to interpret among many psalms. This study gave particular attention to these verses since they serve to describe the Israelites’ fundamental issue in the wilderness. This article suggests one way to understand the meaning of verses 13-15, especially concerning the nature of Israel’s sin. Regarding the psalm’s structure, a few scholars have expounded on the chiastic structure of the psalm. Unlike other structural analyses, this article uniquely notices that the psalm’s structure exposes the progressive nature of Israel’s sin.
In order to advance the argument, this article first undertakes a poetic analysis of verses 13-15 to reveal their meanings. Second, since it argues the development of Israel’s sin in Psalm 106, this article articulates the chiastic structure of the psalm. Lastly, this article locates verses 13-15 in the chiastic structure and demonstrates the gradual intensification of the Israelites’ sin in that structure.
Verses 13-15 locate the first incident in the wilderness in the structure; thus, they exhibit Israel’s fundamental failure i.e., testing God. In the structure, the sin of “testing God” (vv. 13-15) gradually grew and developed into another phase of sin, “jealousy” (vv. 16-18). Further, the structure of Psalm 106 shows that the development of sin is crystallized by the Israelites’ worshipping idols (vv. 19-23, 28-31), and this wickedness led the people to reject the promised land (vv. 24-27).
In sum, this article suggests one way to understand the meaning of verses 13-15 and reveals the theological contribution of Psalm 106’s chiastic structure that Israel’s “Testing God” is a fundamental sin among Israelites which ultimately results in the loss of the promised land.
Among various subjects, this article focuses on Israel’s sin in Psalm 106. Notably, it attempts to reveal the meaning of verses 13-15 and the function of the psalm’s structure. Concerning verses 13-15, there is no single scholarly consensus on the meaning of the passage. These verses are often referred to as one of the most puzzling texts to interpret among many psalms. This study gave particular attention to these verses since they serve to describe the Israelites’ fundamental issue in the wilderness. This article suggests one way to understand the meaning of verses 13-15, especially concerning the nature of Israel’s sin. Regarding the psalm’s structure, a few scholars have expounded on the chiastic structure of the psalm. Unlike other structural analyses, this article uniquely notices that the psalm’s structure exposes the progressive nature of Israel’s sin.
In order to advance the argument, this article first undertakes a poetic analysis of verses 13-15 to reveal their meanings. Second, since it argues the development of Israel’s sin in Psalm 106, this article articulates the chiastic structure of the psalm. Lastly, this article locates verses 13-15 in the chiastic structure and demonstrates the gradual intensification of the Israelites’ sin in that structure.
Verses 13-15 locate the first incident in the wilderness in the structure; thus, they exhibit Israel’s fundamental failure i.e., testing God. In the structure, the sin of “testing God” (vv. 13-15) gradually grew and developed into another phase of sin, “jealousy” (vv. 16-18). Further, the structure of Psalm 106 shows that the development of sin is crystallized by the Israelites’ worshipping idols (vv. 19-23, 28-31), and this wickedness led the people to reject the promised land (vv. 24-27).
In sum, this article suggests one way to understand the meaning of verses 13-15 and reveals the theological contribution of Psalm 106’s chiastic structure that Israel’s “Testing God” is a fundamental sin among Israelites which ultimately results in the loss of the promised land.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Analysis of Verses 13-15
3. The Literary Structure of Psalm 106: Chiasm
4. Theological Observations: Israel’s Fundamental Problem and ItsIntensification
5. Conclusion
References
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Psalm 23
번역하다
2022 .05
-
Psalm 23
번역하다
2022 .05
-
시편 34-37편 문맥 속에서 시편 37편 읽기
장신논단
2018 .12
-
시편 80편의 다의성 : 탄식시에서 제왕시로
구약논단
2018 .06
-
Recalling David and His Psalms after the Return: Focusing on the Themes of Psalms 57, 60, and 108
구약논단
2023 .06
-
‘가난한 자’의 하나님, ‘가난한 자’만의 하나님: 시편 74편과 76편의 עני<아니>에 대한 해석적 전환을 중심으로
구약논집
2023 .03
-
메노라에 비친 시편 67
신학사상
2019 .01
-
역사 속에 행하시는 하나님과 이스라엘의 반응: 시편 105 - 106편 연구
성경과 신학
2016 .01
-
‘제사장-왕’을 통한 야훼의 통치 : 시편 110편의 해석과 적용
구약논단
2017 .12
-
시편 119편과 145편에서 나타나는 절 단위 평행법에 관한 비교 연구
구약논단
2024 .12
-
성서일과로 본 시편의 활용에 관한 모색
구약논단
2015 .06
-
지혜시와 제왕시의 짝으로 본 시편의 구성 연구 -제 1권(1-41편)을 중심으로-
Canon&Culture
2020 .10
-
시편에 나타난 삶의 세 주기(Oriented, Disoriented, Reoriented)의 영성 고찰
한국기독교신학논총
2017 .01
-
시편 8편과 104편의 생태학적 읽기와 신학적 성찰
구약논집
2021 .12
-
전략적 배열의 관점에서 본 시편 110편 1절의 메시지
한국기독교신학논총
2017 .01
-
시편의 문맥 속에서 시편 110편의 화자와 청자
한국개혁신학
2016 .11
-
시편 23편 분석 : 히브리 시 분석 방법론과 이미지 수사학적 분석
ACTS 신학저널
2017 .01
-
시편 18편 2절, ‘내가 주를 사랑하나이다’의 번역과 신학적 의미 -사무엘하 22장과의 비교를 중심으로-
구약논단
2022 .09
-
시편의 지혜시와 제왕시의 원근법과 통전성에 대한 연구: 시편 1-2권을 중심으로
성경과 신학
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0