개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to delve into the equivocality of Psalm 80. It has been discussed that Psalm 80 is a communal lament derived from the Northern tribal cultic settings. Verses 16 and 18 (MT versification), however, demonstrate such evident Messianic expressions as “the one at your right hand” or “the son of man strengthened by God,” which must have been used in the Souhtern kingdom in relation to the Davidic covenant. How does a psalm contain both traditions of the Northern and the Southern kingdom? What does “the son of man” whom God strengthens signify? Is he the king of the Northern or the Southern monarchy? Or is he the future Messiah who will rebuild the whole Israelite community?
In order to respond to these questions, this paper first discusses the characteristics of equivocality of Psalm 80. Due to the complicated history ofli terary transmissions of the psalm, the text displays a complexity that any specific methodology of interpretation could not solve. That is why this paper utilizes a literary-canonical criticism to exegete the text. Because the literary-canonical critical perspective regards the text as it is. It considers the contradictions and dispariet s of a text as a signal for some changes in the literary context resulting in new meaningsf or each canonical community.
Second, the structure of the third Book of the Psalm which is composed of 17 psalms has been analyzed. We have found that the 17 psalms form a chiasmus centering Psalm 81, which is the only communal praise in the third corpus. Our text Psalm 80 includes the central Psalm 81 with the other pair of Psalm 82. It is surprising that both Psalm 80 and 82 emerge as “Royal Psalms.” It demands that Psalm 80 should be read as a psalm in the category of royal psalms, but not of communal psalms.
Third, the doublet of verses 16 and 18 has been interpreted bya rhetorical critical method. Even though the two verses seem to be miswritten by repetition, the literary context shows an intentional significant change of the meaning of “the stock” in verse 16. As the word is changed from “son” in verse 16 to “son of man” in verse 18, the meaning of the vine is transformed from the Israelite community to the future messianic king.
Finally, it mentions three messianic points that Psalm 80 signfiies. They are related to the Nathan oracle in 2 Samuel 7, to the concept of Saviour in the future, and to “the One who is right side of God” in Psalm 110:1.
This paper concludes with two points. One is that the literary-canonical reading is an appropriate interpretative tool to elucidate the equivocal meanings of Psalm 80. The other is that the future study of Psalm 80 should be concenred with a deeper level of investigation into the tradition of the “Son of Man” in relation to Psalms 8, 89, 110 and other prophetic literature as well as Daniel 7.
In order to respond to these questions, this paper first discusses the characteristics of equivocality of Psalm 80. Due to the complicated history ofli terary transmissions of the psalm, the text displays a complexity that any specific methodology of interpretation could not solve. That is why this paper utilizes a literary-canonical criticism to exegete the text. Because the literary-canonical critical perspective regards the text as it is. It considers the contradictions and dispariet s of a text as a signal for some changes in the literary context resulting in new meaningsf or each canonical community.
Second, the structure of the third Book of the Psalm which is composed of 17 psalms has been analyzed. We have found that the 17 psalms form a chiasmus centering Psalm 81, which is the only communal praise in the third corpus. Our text Psalm 80 includes the central Psalm 81 with the other pair of Psalm 82. It is surprising that both Psalm 80 and 82 emerge as “Royal Psalms.” It demands that Psalm 80 should be read as a psalm in the category of royal psalms, but not of communal psalms.
Third, the doublet of verses 16 and 18 has been interpreted bya rhetorical critical method. Even though the two verses seem to be miswritten by repetition, the literary context shows an intentional significant change of the meaning of “the stock” in verse 16. As the word is changed from “son” in verse 16 to “son of man” in verse 18, the meaning of the vine is transformed from the Israelite community to the future messianic king.
Finally, it mentions three messianic points that Psalm 80 signfiies. They are related to the Nathan oracle in 2 Samuel 7, to the concept of Saviour in the future, and to “the One who is right side of God” in Psalm 110:1.
This paper concludes with two points. One is that the literary-canonical reading is an appropriate interpretative tool to elucidate the equivocal meanings of Psalm 80. The other is that the future study of Psalm 80 should be concenred with a deeper level of investigation into the tradition of the “Son of Man” in relation to Psalms 8, 89, 110 and other prophetic literature as well as Daniel 7.
목차
1. 들어가기
2. 시편 80편의 다의적 요소 - 방법론적 제안
3. 제 3권에서의 시편 80편의 위치
4. 시편 80편의 “벤”과 “벤 아담”
5. 시편 80편의 메시아사상
6. 나가는 말
7. 참고문헌
참고문헌 (35)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김진규 / 2009 / 제왕시의 전략적 위치에서 본 시편 89편 / 구약논단 15 (2) : 83 ~ 110
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김창대 / 2009 / 주위 문맥에서 본 시편 46편의 시온 신학 / 구약논단 15 (2) : 63 ~ 82
[단행본] - 김창대 / 2015 / 한 권으로 꿰뚫는 시편: 성도의 탄식과 하나님의 응답 / IVP
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 문은미 / 2009 / 시편의 구성적 접근을 통한 시편 제4권의 이해 / Canon&Culture(캐논앤컬처) 3 (2) : 177 ~ 209
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 하경택 / 2009 / 시편 82편의 해석과 적용 / 구약논단 15 (3) : 49 ~ 66
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김창대 / 2009 / 주위 문맥에서 본 시편 46편의 시온 신학 / 구약논단 15 (2) : 63 ~ 82
[단행본] - 김창대 / 2015 / 한 권으로 꿰뚫는 시편: 성도의 탄식과 하나님의 응답 / IVP
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 문은미 / 2009 / 시편의 구성적 접근을 통한 시편 제4권의 이해 / Canon&Culture(캐논앤컬처) 3 (2) : 177 ~ 209
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 하경택 / 2009 / 시편 82편의 해석과 적용 / 구약논단 15 (3) : 49 ~ 66
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Psalm 23
번역하다
2022 .05
-
Psalm 23
번역하다
2022 .05
-
시편 34-37편 문맥 속에서 시편 37편 읽기
장신논단
2018 .12
-
Recalling David and His Psalms after the Return: Focusing on the Themes of Psalms 57, 60, and 108
구약논단
2023 .06
-
‘제사장-왕’을 통한 야훼의 통치 : 시편 110편의 해석과 적용
구약논단
2017 .12
-
메노라에 비친 시편 67
신학사상
2019 .01
-
시편 119편과 145편에서 나타나는 절 단위 평행법에 관한 비교 연구
구약논단
2024 .12
-
“Testing God” Becomes “Rejection of the Land”: Israel’s Sin in Psalm 106 in Light of the Psalm’s Chiastic Structure
성경원문연구
2021 .04
-
지혜시와 제왕시의 짝으로 본 시편의 구성 연구 -제 1권(1-41편)을 중심으로-
Canon&Culture
2020 .10
-
‘가난한 자’의 하나님, ‘가난한 자’만의 하나님: 시편 74편과 76편의 עני<아니>에 대한 해석적 전환을 중심으로
구약논집
2023 .03
-
성서일과로 본 시편의 활용에 관한 모색
구약논단
2015 .06
-
시편의 문맥 속에서 시편 110편의 화자와 청자
한국개혁신학
2016 .11
-
전략적 배열의 관점에서 본 시편 110편 1절의 메시지
한국기독교신학논총
2017 .01
-
시편의 지혜시와 제왕시의 원근법과 통전성에 대한 연구: 시편 1-2권을 중심으로
성경과 신학
2020 .01
-
시편에 나타난 삶의 세 주기(Oriented, Disoriented, Reoriented)의 영성 고찰
한국기독교신학논총
2017 .01
-
시편 8편과 104편의 생태학적 읽기와 신학적 성찰
구약논집
2021 .12
-
시편 51편에 대한 통전적 읽기
선교와 신학
2018 .06
-
시편 18편 2절, ‘내가 주를 사랑하나이다’의 번역과 신학적 의미 -사무엘하 22장과의 비교를 중심으로-
구약논단
2022 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0