지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제124호
- 발행연도
- 2022.6
- 수록면
- 405 - 444 (40page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2022.06.124.405
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Argument of “Special Circumstances for a Colonized State”(植民地特殊事情論) was made to emphasize the colony(Korea)’s different history, culture and natural environment from the mainland(Japan). It was also argued because of the ‘Situation on the Ground’ (which usually meant the colony population’s resistance), with the intention of demanding a different type of ruling other than methods used to govern the mainland. In essence, required by the people who supported this argument was a legislation process entrusted to the colony itself. The argument focused on promoting the necessity of autonomous functions of the Joseon Governor General office continued on and off repeatedly during Japan’s occupation of the Korean peninsula. The first phase, which continued since the year 1895 through 1911, is examined in this article.
Two things were revealed by the examination. First, the Governor-General office’s independent legislation, based on rights delegated from the mainland, was never suggested based on any individual Governor-General office’s status, but was actually based on years of experiences of Japan’s colonial ruling of regions -from Taiwan to Joseon- and the rules and principles gathered through that experience. Second, the “Special Circumstances for a Colonized State” argument and the ‘Entrusted Legislation’ of the Governor-General office was made possible only after acknowledging the possibility/necessity of extending the mainland’s law and regulations to the colonized regions, which was then followed by a decision to postpone such extension for a while. As of 1911, however, the “Argument” was more refined, with the intention to ever block the possibility of both the mainland and the colonized regions being ruled with the same law.
It is necessary to examine more of this “Argument” and how it was eventually implemented in Joseon, as it would give us the opportunity to reexamine the previous notion that the mainland Japan’s law was extended to the ruling of the colonized Korean peninsula. The March 1st Movement in 1919, which was indeed a “Situation on the Ground,” served as a catalyst for the launch of such argument. On the other hand, the fact that there were calls for the abolishment of the “Argument,” and even attempts to “extend mainland laws,” right after the March 1st Movement, ironically shows us that the colonial uthorities were operating with no established principles.
Two things were revealed by the examination. First, the Governor-General office’s independent legislation, based on rights delegated from the mainland, was never suggested based on any individual Governor-General office’s status, but was actually based on years of experiences of Japan’s colonial ruling of regions -from Taiwan to Joseon- and the rules and principles gathered through that experience. Second, the “Special Circumstances for a Colonized State” argument and the ‘Entrusted Legislation’ of the Governor-General office was made possible only after acknowledging the possibility/necessity of extending the mainland’s law and regulations to the colonized regions, which was then followed by a decision to postpone such extension for a while. As of 1911, however, the “Argument” was more refined, with the intention to ever block the possibility of both the mainland and the colonized regions being ruled with the same law.
It is necessary to examine more of this “Argument” and how it was eventually implemented in Joseon, as it would give us the opportunity to reexamine the previous notion that the mainland Japan’s law was extended to the ruling of the colonized Korean peninsula. The March 1st Movement in 1919, which was indeed a “Situation on the Ground,” served as a catalyst for the launch of such argument. On the other hand, the fact that there were calls for the abolishment of the “Argument,” and even attempts to “extend mainland laws,” right after the March 1st Movement, ironically shows us that the colonial uthorities were operating with no established principles.
#식민지통치원리
#식민지특수사정론
#조선총독부
#대만총독부
#위임입법
#내지 연장주의
#Ruling principle of a colony
#“Special Circumstances for a Colonized State(植民地特殊事情論)”
#the Governor-General office of Joseon
#the Governor-General office of Taiwan
#delegated/entrusted legislation
#Considering the Korean peninsula as extension of the main land(Japan)
목차
머리말
1. 식민지 통치 원리 구상과 ‘식민지특수사정론’의 제기
2. ‘식민지특수사정론’의 중층화와 조선총독 위임입법의 관철
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1920년대 『朝鮮文 朝鮮』의 내용구성과 특징
숭실사학
2019 .01
-
1930년대 전반 조선총독부 예산편성과 인프라 투자의 단기화 -1932년 조선사업공채 발행예산을 중심으로-
한국사학보
2023 .05
-
조선후기 충청도 수령과 도내 행정기관의 운영체계와 조정방식
동양고전연구
2020 .01
-
일제시기 토지소유권 확립을 둘러싼 사법적 분쟁의 해소 –김성윤과 도요타 후쿠타로의 소송을 중심으로-
역사와현실
2021 .12
-
唐代 節度使의 설치 始期와 初代 절도사
역사학보
2024 .12
-
19세기 ‘심리의 시대’를 들여다보는 창 -『일성록』·『추조결옥록』· 장계등록을 이용한 살옥사건 기록의 재구성-
민족문화
2022 .03
-
일제강점기 대만(臺灣)의 문화재 제도화 과정과조선 비교
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2018 .01
-
『蜻蛉日記』下巻の「霜枯れの」歌の成立事情
일본어문학
2019 .01
-
다산 정약용의 목민활동과 이상사회 : 곡산부사 시기(1797~1799)를 중심으로
역사연구
2016 .12
-
국가총동원법의 실시와 휘발유 배급통제 실태－1939년 조선총독부 법무국 사례를 중심으로－
한일관계사연구
2021 .05
-
近代韓ㆍ日ㆍ臺灣의 국정교과서에 ‘天皇’으로 표상된 帝國의 식민교육 -1910년대 초등 <일본어교과서>를 중심으로-
일어일문학
2023 .11
-
잡지 『朝鮮公論』의 1930년대 사설에 나타난 조선통치론과 내선융화론
한국민족운동사연구
2019 .01
-
조선총독부박물관 초기 소장품의 형성과 성격
역사학보
2020 .06
-
唐 後期 官僚의 陞進과 幕職官 經歷
중국사연구
2017 .01
-
[Taiwan] Waves of Wonder
트래비 Travie
2024 .11
-
[총론] 조선후기 중앙 군문의 재정운영
역사와현실
2016 .12
-
朝鮮總督府 編纂 初等敎科書에 表象된 臺灣 ─ <지리> <일본어> 교과서를 중심으로 ─
日本語敎育
2017 .01
-
‘65년 체제’의 시각 정치와 <총독의 딸>
한국근대문학연구
2017 .04
-
車相瓚의 지방사정조사와 조선문화인식 : ‘朝鮮文化의 基本調査’를 중심으로
역사교육
2018 .12
-
1920년대 말 일본 정치와 조선총독경질에 대한 고찰
통일인문학
2019 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-911-001553928