지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Morrison Version is the first Chinese Bible to be fully translated by a Protestant missionary, Morrison, and holds a very important place in the history of the Chinese Bible. The Morrison Version is a great literature not only of the historical value of the Bible, but also of linguistic historical value.
In the text, the characteristics and contents of translation were examined, focusing on the vocabulary of the Morrison Version.
First, the Morrison Version is faithfully translated into the original text of the Bible. There are many vocabulary words that match Hela’s original text. For example, the ‘π ν ε υ ́ μα τ ο ς’ in the original text of Hella means ‘wind’. It was translated as ‘holy spirit’ in the General Bible, and in the Morrison Version, it was translated as ‘holy wind’.
Second, the Morrison version uses a colloquial style and a literal style. The Morrison Version is an octopus translation, but Morrison thought it would be difficult for people to use colloquial language. For example, ‘yu(余)’, ‘wu(吾)’, and ‘wo(我)’ were used as first-person pronouns. ‘yu(余)’ and ‘wu(吾)’ are written in octopus and ‘我’ is colloquial.
Third, Morrison refrained from using Catholic terms in the translation of the Bible and used Christian terms. God was translated as ‘God(神)’ rather than ‘the emperor(天主)’ used in Catholicism.
Fourth, in the Morrison version, words derived from Buddhism were used. These words became Christian vocabulary with the spread of the Bible. The related vocabulary is ‘prayer(祈禱)’, ‘worship(礼拜)’, and ‘satan(撒但)’.
Fifth, some words in the Morrison version are not in single form. For example, ‘Christ’ has been translated as ‘The Messiah’, ‘Christ’. This seems to be an error that occurred during the early translation of the Bible.
In the text, the characteristics and contents of translation were examined, focusing on the vocabulary of the Morrison Version.
First, the Morrison Version is faithfully translated into the original text of the Bible. There are many vocabulary words that match Hela’s original text. For example, the ‘π ν ε υ ́ μα τ ο ς’ in the original text of Hella means ‘wind’. It was translated as ‘holy spirit’ in the General Bible, and in the Morrison Version, it was translated as ‘holy wind’.
Second, the Morrison version uses a colloquial style and a literal style. The Morrison Version is an octopus translation, but Morrison thought it would be difficult for people to use colloquial language. For example, ‘yu(余)’, ‘wu(吾)’, and ‘wo(我)’ were used as first-person pronouns. ‘yu(余)’ and ‘wu(吾)’ are written in octopus and ‘我’ is colloquial.
Third, Morrison refrained from using Catholic terms in the translation of the Bible and used Christian terms. God was translated as ‘God(神)’ rather than ‘the emperor(天主)’ used in Catholicism.
Fourth, in the Morrison version, words derived from Buddhism were used. These words became Christian vocabulary with the spread of the Bible. The related vocabulary is ‘prayer(祈禱)’, ‘worship(礼拜)’, and ‘satan(撒但)’.
Fifth, some words in the Morrison version are not in single form. For example, ‘Christ’ has been translated as ‘The Messiah’, ‘Christ’. This seems to be an error that occurred during the early translation of the Bible.
목차
1. 서론
2. 『신천성서(神天聖書)』의 어휘 번역 고찰
3. 결론
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
20세기 이전 중국어 성서 번역의 역사와 의의
한국기독교신학논총
2019 .10
-
영어 성경 번역의 역사
성경원문연구
2018 .04
-
서양 개신교 선교사들의 중국어 성경 번역과 쉬운 문어체의 의의
중국어문학
2017 .01
-
화합본 중역성경의 문체 분화
통번역학연구
2016 .01
-
기독교 교육에 있어서 번역 문체에 대한 지향점 고찰: 어린이와 어른 성경 버전을 중심으로
통번역교육연구
2019 .01
-
Translating Scripture for Sound and Performance: New Directions in Biblical Studies : James A. Maxey and Ernst R. Wendland, eds., Biblical Performance Criticism 6, Eugene: Cascade Books, 2012
성경원문연구
2018 .04
-
1912년 간행된 중국어 성경의 언어 특징 연구 — 『쉐레쉐브스키 쉬운 문리역』과 『관화체화합본』의 마태복음을 중심으로
중국문화연구
2022 .08
-
십계명(출 20:1-17)의 중(中) · 한(韓) 성서 비교 연구
구약논단
2019 .09
-
기계번역·인간번역·트랜스크리에이션의 문체 비교: 광고 번역을 중심으로
통번역학연구
2017 .01
-
≪滿文老檔≫ 한·일 번역본의 표기와 번역 차이 : 저본으로 인한 차이를 중심으로
알타이학보
2019 .01
-
The Japanese Translations of the Hebrew Bible: History, Inventory and Analysis (Doron B. Cohen, Leiden: Brill, 2013)
성경원문연구
2022 .04
-
중국 고대기독교 경교의 『성경』 번역
번역학연구
2015 .06
-
매체 환경 변화와 성서 번역
신학논단
2017 .03
-
중국 고대 역장(驛場)제도에 대한 고찰- 번역의 시스템과 방법을 중심으로-
언어학연구
2017 .01
-
한국어 교재의 중국어 번역 방법 연구
이중언어학
2015 .01
-
<기쁜소식성경>(Good News Bible)의 1992년 개정과 그 배경
성경원문연구
2020 .04
-
역(逆)번역을 활용한 문학번역 교육 - 신경숙의 『엄마를 부탁해』의 한국어↔스페인어 번역을 중심으로
스페인어문학
2019 .01
-
일한기계번역의 오류유형에 관한 고찰-일본소설을 중심으로-
일어일문학연구
2018 .01
-
개념적 은유표현의 중국어 번역방법 연구: 한국소설 속 ‘사랑’ 표현을 중심으로
통번역학연구
2018 .01
-
AI시대 학부번역수업의 기계번역 적용에 관한 연구 - 중한번역수업 심층인터뷰를 중심으로
번역학연구
2025 .03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092190209