메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
심종석 (대구대학교) 서민교 (대구대학교)
저널정보
한국무역학회 무역학회지 貿易學會誌 第33卷 第5號
발행연도
2008.11
수록면
253 - 274 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (10)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The CISG uses the term fundamental breach, in various setting. The concept of fundamental breach is a milestone in its remedial provisions. Its most important role is that it constitutes the usual precondition for the contract to be avoided(Art. 49, 51, 64, 72, 73). In addition, where the goods do not conform with the contract, a fundamental breach can give rise to a requirement to deliver substitute goods. Furthermore, a fundamental breach of contract by the seller leaves the buyer with all of his remedies intact, despite the risk having passed to him(Art. 70). Basically, PECL, PICC generally follows CISG. it was similar to all the regulation's platform though the terms and content sometimes differ. For example regarding to the non-performance and remedies, in the case of non-performance, that is the PECL, PICC term analogous to breach of contract as used in the CISG. Furthermore the PECL, PICC used fundamental non-performance refered to in PECL Art. 8:103, PICC Art. 7.1.1 correspond generally to the concept of fundamental breach referred to in CISG Art. 25. The main significance of the fundamental non-performance, in any systems, is to empower the aggrieved party to terminate the contract. The need for uniformity and harmony in int'l commercial contracts can be expected to lead to growth of int'l commerce subject to the CISG, PICC, and PECL. It is hoped that the present editorial remarks will provide guidance to improve understanding between the contractual party of different countries in this respect. In the case of CISG, main articles for terminate of contract, Art. 25, 49, 51, 72, 64, 79 and so forth. To sum up these article, breach of contract committed by one of the parties is fundamental if it results in such detriment to the other party as substantially to deprive him of what he is entitled to expect under the contract, unless the party in breach did not foresee and a reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances would not have foreseen such a result. In the other hand PICC, are Art. 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 7.1.1, 7.1.3, 7.3.1, 7.3.3 and so on. Not only there is hardship where the occurrence of events fundamentally alters the equilibrium of the contract either because the cost of a party's performance has increased or because the value of the performance a party receives has diminished but in the case of hardship the disadvantaged party is entitled to request renegotiations. the request shall be made without undue delay and shall indicate the grounds on which it is based. Finally PECL are regulatory articles, that is to say, Art. 6:111, 8:103, 8:106, 9:301 to summarize of these issues, a non-performance of an obligation is fundamental to the contract if strict compliance with the obligation is of the essence of the contract or the non-performance substantially deprives the aggrieved party of what it was entitled to expect under the contract, unless the other party did not foresee and could not reasonably have foreseen that result or the non-performance is intentional and gives the aggrieved party reason to believe that it cannot rely on the other party's future performance.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 국제계약법규범하에서 계약불이행의 결정기준에 관한 비교
Ⅲ. 계약불이행에 관한 적용사례 분석
Ⅲ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-326-003706769