메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
연세대학교 국학연구원 동방학지 동방학지 제144호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
433 - 469 (37page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
「The one of the grandest sights of Qing dynasty｣ is an article of 󰡔Yeolha-ilgi󰡕 of Yeonam Park Jiwon(燕巖 朴趾源, 1737∼1805)' writing. He argued in it that Chosun Dynasty had to learn Qing dynasty's civilization. Many people of Chosun dynasty looked at Qing dynasty in view of the doctrines of great land to change the barbarians(尊周攘夷), so they believed that Qing dynasty was the barbarians and must be ejected. But He had an different angle on the problem. He thought that Qing dynasty was not barbarous, but had already been civilized. So he argued first that the respect for the Sinic civilization was one thing and the barbarians were another. He believed that even though the doctrines of great land to change the barbarians could be acceptable, but we had not to look at Ming dynasty and Qing dynasty in view of it. It means that he wanted to exchange the context of understanding of Qing dynasty Second, he argued that many evidences could be considered as the opposite evidences to prove the Sinic civilization of Qing dynasty, which was believed to prove Qing dynasty the barbarian. He thought that Qing dynasty was not only a successor of the Sinic civilization formally, but also had carried his civilization into practice essentially. and in addition Its civilization could be usually confirmed in the people's daily life. But He recognized also that all culture of Qing dynasty was not civilized ; Some were civilized, and the others were barbarous, and they was not of the same quality, so could not treat them equally. He wanted to divide them into two classes, and treat them in according to their special quality. One is the doctrine of the civilization of Qing dynasty, and the other is the reinterpretation of the ejection of barbarians. He argued that even though there were some evidences to admit of no excuse in the culture of Qing dynasty, Chosun dynasty should learn and introduce the civilization of Qing dynasty, but should not eject it. He meaned that a concept of the ejection of barbarians had to be changed into a concept of learning of the its civilization. The reinterpretation of the ejection of barbarians presented a new vision out of the argument of dynastic identity. This is just a point he said, namely that Qing dynasty had already been civilized, so Chosun dynasty had to introduce the civilization of Qing dynasty and advance its own self.
#『열하일기』 #「제일장관? #청나라 중화론 #청나라 문화 수용론 #존주양이 #용하변이 #연암 #박지원 #the diary of a journey into Beijing )』 #the Sinic civilization of Qing dynasty and the necessity of introducing it

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청
朴趾源 / 2001 / 行在雜錄, In 燕巖集 권13 / 민족문화추진회 : 242 ~ google schola 朴趾源 / 2001 / 關內程史, In 燕巖集 권12 / 민족문화추진회 : 198 ~ google schola 朴趾源 / 2001 / 馹?隨筆, In 燕巖集 권12 / 민족문화추진회 : 176 ~ 177 google schola 洪起文 / 1988 / 朴燕巖의 藝術과 思想 / 한국한문학연구 11 google schola 鄭玉子 / 1998 / 조선후기 조선중화사상연구 / 일지사 : 17 ~ 18 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0