메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국형사법학회 형사법연구 형사법연구 제22권 제1호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
125 - 162 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The retrial is a Complaints Procedures which change the fixed an irrevocable judgment, if the an irrevocable judgment has a significant mistake. The retrial is the most important occasion , in which remove conclusive power of judgement for the justice in case of collision between stability of law and justice. When viewed in the realistic point, The Supreme Court gives too hard guide line to the retrial. If the court operate the retrial too severe, Provision of the retrial in the Criminal Procedure actually will be meaningless. Therefore the system of retrial must be operated to have effects as Rechtsnorm reflecting expectation and requirements of reality. And the approach to the newness and clearness of the evidence must be based on the view point, the retrial has to be understood as not a simple decoration but a system to be utilized for the people. After all we could conclude as follows :1) Decision standard to the newness of evidence is enough as newness to the court, 2) In the meaning of clearness of evidence it needs not certainty beyond a resonable doubt, but belief or powers of persuasion to the judge. 3) in the decision of clearness judge must revaluate new evidence as well as old evidence synthetically.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0